"Alias" <> wrote in message
news:gknud2$qa0$...
> measekite's psychiatrist wrote:
>> "Alias" <> wrote in message
>> news:gkntoa$jh1$...
>>> Bob Campbell wrote:
>>>> "measekite's psychiatrist" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:V2Kbl.17827$...
>>>>>>> Rolls Royce has less than 1% of the car market but that doesn't make
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>> Rolls a bad car.
>>>>> Could you imagine if Rolls Royce was FREE and still had less than 1%
>>>>> of the market? That would make the product a piece of Crap. Ubuntu
>>>>> is FREE and Ubuntu has less than 1% of the market. Ubuntu has been
>>>>> FREE for years. If the product was good, word of mouth would spread
>>>>> like wildfire and EVERYBODY would be using it. Users would ditch
>>>>> Windows like a cheap suit. Guess what? They don't ditch Windows.
>>>>> Ubuntu is crap and EVERYBODY knows it (Except Alias) What a fool.
>>>> Exactly. If Linux cost $250,000 a copy, then Linux would have an
>>>> excuse for having such a small market share. When it is free, you
>>>> have no excuse except that the product sucks and no one wants it.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Over ten million users disagree with you. Ubuntu has doubled its user
>>> base since its inception. Windows has lost market share. Do the math if
>>> you can (you can't).
>>>
>>> Alias
>>
>> You think that because 10 million users have downloaded Ubuntu, there are
>> 10 million copies running. That is far from the truth. Out of those 10
>> million downloads, maybe 100,000 are activly using it on the desktop.
>>
>>
>>
>
> The figure comes from Net usage, dimwit.
>
and how do they figure that one out? Since there is no activation, sounds
like a snow job.
|