Alias wrote:
> [signius] ^ 2 wrote:
>> oh yes it is stupidity...!!!!!!!!!!!
>>
>> because if you have home editions of vista
>> you cannot restore those files unless you use a hack third party ultitiy
>>
>> only business and ultimate allows you to use the shadow copy
>>
>> in other words all versions eat up space, but only a few versions
>> allow you to use the space to actually restore...
>>
>>
>> when I say vista is stupid... I know what I am talking
>> about!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> You're not the only one:
>
> http://www.infoworld.com/article/08/...follies_1.html
>
> Alias
I take offense to this statement in the article:
Microsoft defended Vista, saying its usability studies showed
that users loved its new interface and that the new
security approach was needed to finally force developers to
abandon sloppy programming techniques -- to be fair, Microsoft
had been imploring developers since 1999 to change their
behavior, to little effect.
What? Microsoft passing the buck of their decades old flaws to
developers? What a silly marketing campaign to begin throwing out
the idea that it is the DEVELOPERS at fault.
If one were to do statistics on the hundred of thousands, if not
millions of 3rd party Windows applications developed over the years,
BY FAR, the security exploitations were MICROSOFT RELATED, not 3rd
party software related.
It appears to me that Microsoft is beginning a campaign to justify
100% monopoly for Microsoft applications on Microsoft Windows, thus
addressing anti-trust concerns by saying 3rd party Software is
INHERENTLY sloppy, where there is NO real evidence of that over the
years.
I'm old and a few years from retiring from this industry. So this is
for the new kids on the block - GET LAW DEGREES and don't allow
Microsoft to dictate your future - SUE THEM FOR SOFTWARE FLAWS. They
have gotten away with MURDER for far too long. You will make more
money here than trying to compete with them with applications.
--