2x Sidebar?

Just a quickie - should there really be two sidebar.exe processes running?

--
Julian I-Do-Stuff

Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com

I only show one, and I have more than one gadget. I would experiment, and
kill one to see if one of your gadgets dies with it.

--
Was this helpful? Then click the Ratings button. Voting helps the web
interface.
http://www.microsoft.com/wn3/locales...eAPostAsAnswer
Mark L. Ferguson
..

"Julian" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Just a quickie - should there really be two sidebar.exe processes running?
>
> --
> Julian I-Do-Stuff
>
> Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com

"Julian" <>'s wild
thoughts were released on Wed, 2 Apr 2008 17:09:09 +0200
bearing the following fruit:

>Just a quickie - should there really be two sidebar.exe processes running?

It's been said before (right here I believe) that extra one
is for 3rd party gadgets.

--
Jan Hyde

https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Jan.Hyde

One instance of sidebar.exe hosts the default gadgets, and the another one is for third-party gadgets.

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows Shell/User]
Windows® Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com
Winhelponline.com blog http://www.winhelponline.com/blog


"Julian" <> wrote in message news:...
Just a quickie - should there really be two sidebar.exe processes running?

--
Julian I-Do-Stuff

Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com

Quick question, quick answers - thanks folks.

"Ramesh, MS-MVP" <ramesh@unknownhost> wrote in message
news:...
One instance of sidebar.exe hosts the default gadgets, and the another one
is for third-party gadgets.

<snip>

"Julian" <> wrote in message
news:...
Just a quickie - should there really be two sidebar.exe processes running?

--
Julian I-Do-Stuff

Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com

vista really conserves ram.. LOL

WHAT A POS OS

"Ramesh, MS-MVP" <ramesh@unknownhost> wrote in message
news:...
One instance of sidebar.exe hosts the default gadgets, and the another one
is for third-party gadgets.

--
Regards,

Ramesh Srinivasan, Microsoft MVP [Windows Shell/User]
Windows® Troubleshooting http://www.winhelponline.com
Winhelponline.com blog http://www.winhelponline.com/blog


"Julian" <> wrote in message
news:...
Just a quickie - should there really be two sidebar.exe processes running?

--
Julian I-Do-Stuff

Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com

> Quick question, quick answers -

Slow OS

vista is the slowest OS I have ever seen

slower than xp, macosx and ubuntu



"Julian" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Quick question, quick answers - thanks folks.
>
> "Ramesh, MS-MVP" <ramesh@unknownhost> wrote in message
> news:...
> One instance of sidebar.exe hosts the default gadgets, and the another one
> is for third-party gadgets.
>
> <snip>
>
> "Julian" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> Just a quickie - should there really be two sidebar.exe processes running?
>
> --
> Julian I-Do-Stuff
>
> Some Vista stuff, but mostly just Stuff at http://berossus,blogspot.com

oh great wrote:

>>Quick question, quick answers -
>
>
> Slow OS
>
> vista is the slowest OS I have ever seen
>
> slower than xp, macosx and ubuntu
>
Translation: that is only you. Why are my installs of Vista faster than
my XP's, huh?
Care to address that fact cc?
Frank

oh great moron wrote:


....you're really ignorant, stupid and a big mouth loser.
Frank

you have faster machines than 4 cores? cut the crap! Same slow response on
all computers I have tested.

Franky poo It appears to me that you never had a finely tuned XP box running
and thats the reason you think vista is faster.
Having a crap install of XP is slow.
But if you compare a fine tuned XP with a fine tuned Vista... XP is at least
20% faster than vista

There is no debate over this. Sorry. this is FACTS, and when XP sp3 comes
out, I will compare via video the crap vistasp1 and xpsp3 and post it so we
can all laugh at vistas poor performance...

FACTS WILL NOT LIE.. I will SUPPLY PROOF AND THEN AT LAST YOU CAN STFU!

Idiot!


"Frank" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> oh great wrote:
>
>>>Quick question, quick answers -
>>
>>
>> Slow OS
>>
>> vista is the slowest OS I have ever seen
>>
>> slower than xp, macosx and ubuntu
>>
> Translation: that is only you. Why are my installs of Vista faster than my
> XP's, huh?
> Care to address that fact cc?
> Frank