TaurArian,
That's a very glib and cavalier response. You seem to be very sure that the
problem so many people here are having is somehow THEIR fault, and not the
update itself.
Shouldn't someone from the number one Software company in the world who
writes -- and publishes -- an update for a prior installation that MAY
(according to you) be corrupt first test for that possible corruption?
And if it IS corrupt, shouldn't a well-written update try to fix the
corruption and then install? Or just not attempt to install.
I think a phrase from the Hippocratic Oath that all doctors pledge is apt
here: "To help, or at least to do no harm."
Alan
"TaurArian" <> wrote in message
news:4645EDDE-BA11-4369-B593-...
> The framework update is failing due to corruption of the original
> installation of the framework package. That to me appears to be a problem
> with your computer not the update. Perhaps blame the person who looks
> after
> the maintenance etc on your computer.
>
>
> "Mark" wrote:
>
>> I got a better idea. Why don't they fix it? Why do we have to hunt and
>> hunt
>> and hunt for fixes to problems we did not create?
>>
>> "PA Bear" wrote:
>>
>> > Do you see any other threads here about the .NET Framework updates?
>> > Have
>> > you read through all of the (helpful) posts in them?
>> >
>> > Start a free Windows Update support incident request:
>> > https://support.microsoft.com/oas/de...spx?gprid=6527
>> > --
>> > ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
>> > MS MVP-Windows (IE, OE, Security, Shell/User)
>> > AumHa VSOP & Admin; DTS-L
>> >
>> > JCO wrote:
>> > > I get these updates that will not install. They (all 3) always fail.
>> > > Any
>> > > ideas?
>> > >
>> > > Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 2.0 (KB928365)
>> > > Security Update for Microsoft .NET Framework, Version 1.1 Service
>> > > Pack 1
>> > > (KB928366)
>> > > Windows Malicious Software Removal Tool - July 2007 (KB890830)
>> > >
>> > > Thanks
>> >
>> >