Not exactly fair either. Since there aren't many
64 bit machines around in the mainstream, then
it is easier to write for 32 bit apps. Same
thing would have happened back in the 16 to 32 bit
days, but there were a lot of machines that were 32
bit capable, mostly running servers.
64 bit is still kind of new. It'll catch up in time,
but then, backwards compatibility will be the issue, not
whether or not it'll run on the 64 bit platform.
--
Curt
"Ken Blake, MVP" <> wrote in message
news:...
> On Fri, 11 Jan 2008 13:31:01 -0800, Ed Wright <Ed
> > wrote:
>
>> i wonder if 64 bit vista is going to be like xp 64 bit and have the same
>> problems with driver support..
>
>
> No operating system has problems with driver support. *You* may have a
> problem, if the manufacturers of some of your hardware don't provide
> the 64-bit drivers you need.
>
> Don't blame Windows, or Microsoft for that. Complain to the hardware
> manufacturers.
>
>
>
>> it seems so..i am wondering why i spent
>> the extra $ on it
>
>
> Good question. Apparently you didn't do your homework to find out
> whether what you needed was available.
>
>
>> now after doing the beta test on it and findin that it ran
>> well in beta with the option to load any driver you wanted than and now
>> it won't let you do that...I loved xp 64 bit..I wish they would continue
>> with
>> working on more drivers for it..maybe one day...lmao
>
> --
> Ken Blake, Microsoft MVP Windows - Shell/User
> Please Reply to the Newsgroup