92 percent of developers ignoring Vista!!!

Vista is crap and the techs know it. Only retards like frank think its
anything else than sh!t. Oh yes vista is a bucket of sh!t, without the
bucket!

And to think Microsoft used to be popular with the developer crowd... Not
anymore. A recent report from Evans Data shows fewer than one in 10 software
developers writing applications for Windows Vista this year. Eight percent.

This is perhaps made even worse by the corresponding data that shows 49
percent of developers writing applications for Windows XP.

Such appreciation for history is not likely to warm the cockles of
Microsoft's heart, especially when Linux is getting lots of love from
developers (13 percent writing apps for it this year and 15.5 percent in
2009). The Mac? I don't have any equivalent data via Evans Data. But the Mac
OS has rocketed by 380 percent as a targeted development platform, Evans
Data told Computerworld.

The numbers don't get much better for Vista in 2009: 24 percent (compared
with 29 percent for XP). That's a big step up from 8 percent, but is it a
sign of momentum to come or just a temporary stopgap while developers wait
until Windows 7?

Nor has Microsoft made it easy to develop Vista applications, according to
an article in ITJungle.com:

Unfortunately, that improved security posture makes it more difficult for
developers to write applications for Vista (read: no more kernel-level
access and UAC to worry about), and it also causes compatibility problems
with older applications. Ironically, the wave of attacks targeting operating
system vulnerabilities has largely passed, and today hackers have moved on
to target applications. At the same time, Microsoft has provided iterative
improvements in Windows XP security, bolstering its status as "good enough"
and further eating into Vista's pie.

Indeed. Microsoft doesn't need to handicap itself on the desktop given its
difficulties competing everywhere else. With Linux and the Mac taking
ever-increasing shares of the developer pie, Microsoft would do well to
shore up developer support for Windows.

source: news.cnet.com
http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-99...&subj=NewsBlog

"Clear Windows" <> wrote in message
news:485849ff$...
> Vista is crap and the techs know it. Only retards like frank think its
> anything else than sh!t. Oh yes vista is a bucket of sh!t, without the
> bucket!
>
> And to think Microsoft used to be popular with the developer crowd... Not
> anymore. A recent report from Evans Data shows fewer than one in 10
> software
> developers writing applications for Windows Vista this year. Eight
> percent.
>
> This is perhaps made even worse by the corresponding data that shows 49
> percent of developers writing applications for Windows XP.
>
> Such appreciation for history is not likely to warm the cockles of
> Microsoft's heart, especially when Linux is getting lots of love from
> developers (13 percent writing apps for it this year and 15.5 percent in
> 2009). The Mac? I don't have any equivalent data via Evans Data. But the
> Mac
> OS has rocketed by 380 percent as a targeted development platform, Evans
> Data told Computerworld.
>
> The numbers don't get much better for Vista in 2009: 24 percent (compared
> with 29 percent for XP). That's a big step up from 8 percent, but is it a
> sign of momentum to come or just a temporary stopgap while developers wait
> until Windows 7?
>
> Nor has Microsoft made it easy to develop Vista applications, according to
> an article in ITJungle.com:
>
> Unfortunately, that improved security posture makes it more difficult for
> developers to write applications for Vista (read: no more kernel-level
> access and UAC to worry about), and it also causes compatibility problems
> with older applications. Ironically, the wave of attacks targeting
> operating
> system vulnerabilities has largely passed, and today hackers have moved on
> to target applications. At the same time, Microsoft has provided iterative
> improvements in Windows XP security, bolstering its status as "good
> enough"
> and further eating into Vista's pie.
>
> Indeed. Microsoft doesn't need to handicap itself on the desktop given its
> difficulties competing everywhere else. With Linux and the Mac taking
> ever-increasing shares of the developer pie, Microsoft would do well to
> shore up developer support for Windows.
>
> source: news.cnet.com
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-99...&subj=NewsBlog
>
>
>

Why does all that make you happy ?
Misery likes company ?

Clear Windows wrote:

---------------------------------

Read the article asshole. Or just continue to make a fool out of yourself.

Now also read the comments:

"Wow... this article doesn't make any sense.

What, exactly, is a "Vista application"? Is it an application that is
written with .NET 3.0+ using WPF, because those run just fine on XP.

In fact, I can't really think of a single development platform that runs
on Vista, but not on XP.

So what is this poll measuring? Is it measuring that lack of adoption of
WPF? If so, I agree, that's a problem"

"I am not a programmer, but even I understand that programmers are
writing code to .Net and not a specific OS.

ActiveWin ought to start a category for stupidest article - this one
gets my vote"

"In related news... 8% of developers are writing windows vista sidebar
gadgets. The rest are writing .net apps."

You'fre an idiot and moron capin' crunch!...LOL!
Frank

"Clear Windows" <> wrote in message
news:485849ff$...
> Vista is crap and the techs know it. Only retards like frank think its
> anything else than sh!t. Oh yes vista is a bucket of sh!t, without the
> bucket!
>
> And to think Microsoft used to be popular with the developer crowd... Not
> anymore. A recent report from Evans Data shows fewer than one in 10
> software
> developers writing applications for Windows Vista this year. Eight
> percent.
>
> This is perhaps made even worse by the corresponding data that shows 49
> percent of developers writing applications for Windows XP.
>
> Such appreciation for history is not likely to warm the cockles of
> Microsoft's heart, especially when Linux is getting lots of love from
> developers (13 percent writing apps for it this year and 15.5 percent in
> 2009). The Mac? I don't have any equivalent data via Evans Data. But the
> Mac
> OS has rocketed by 380 percent as a targeted development platform, Evans
> Data told Computerworld.
>
> The numbers don't get much better for Vista in 2009: 24 percent (compared
> with 29 percent for XP). That's a big step up from 8 percent, but is it a
> sign of momentum to come or just a temporary stopgap while developers wait
> until Windows 7?
>
> Nor has Microsoft made it easy to develop Vista applications, according to
> an article in ITJungle.com:
>
> Unfortunately, that improved security posture makes it more difficult for
> developers to write applications for Vista (read: no more kernel-level
> access and UAC to worry about), and it also causes compatibility problems
> with older applications. Ironically, the wave of attacks targeting
> operating
> system vulnerabilities has largely passed, and today hackers have moved on
> to target applications. At the same time, Microsoft has provided iterative
> improvements in Windows XP security, bolstering its status as "good
> enough"
> and further eating into Vista's pie.
>
> Indeed. Microsoft doesn't need to handicap itself on the desktop given its
> difficulties competing everywhere else. With Linux and the Mac taking
> ever-increasing shares of the developer pie, Microsoft would do well to
> shore up developer support for Windows.
>
> source: news.cnet.com
> http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-99...&subj=NewsBlog
>
>

Amazing. You can cut and paste. I am proud of you. I'm sure you had lots
of help with this task. I'll bet your sorry excuse for a brain is really
tired. Better stop stroking it by the way.

"Frank" <> wrote in message
news:48585720$0$4272$...
> Clear Windows wrote:
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> Read the article asshole. Or just continue to make a fool out of yourself.
>
> Now also read the comments:
>
> "Wow... this article doesn't make any sense.
>
> What, exactly, is a "Vista application"? Is it an application that is
> written with .NET 3.0+ using WPF, because those run just fine on XP.
>
> In fact, I can't really think of a single development platform that runs
> on Vista, but not on XP.
>
> So what is this poll measuring? Is it measuring that lack of adoption of
> WPF? If so, I agree, that's a problem"
>
> "I am not a programmer, but even I understand that programmers are writing
> code to .Net and not a specific OS.
>
> ActiveWin ought to start a category for stupidest article - this one gets
> my vote"
>
> "In related news... 8% of developers are writing windows vista sidebar
> gadgets. The rest are writing .net apps."
>
> You'fre an idiot and moron capin' crunch!...LOL!
> Frank

I think our 'Clear Windows' has had a lobotomy sometime during his short
life.

you are an idiot....

you are clueless

you are repulsive

you are a freakshow


get lost bastard




"Frank" <> wrote in message
news:48585720$0$4272$...
> Clear Windows wrote:
>
> ---------------------------------
>
> Read the article asshole. Or just continue to make a fool out of yourself.
>
> Now also read the comments:
>
> "Wow... this article doesn't make any sense.
>
> What, exactly, is a "Vista application"? Is it an application that is
> written with .NET 3.0+ using WPF, because those run just fine on XP.
>
> In fact, I can't really think of a single development platform that runs
> on Vista, but not on XP.
>
> So what is this poll measuring? Is it measuring that lack of adoption of
> WPF? If so, I agree, that's a problem"
>
> "I am not a programmer, but even I understand that programmers are writing
> code to .Net and not a specific OS.
>
> ActiveWin ought to start a category for stupidest article - this one gets
> my vote"
>
> "In related news... 8% of developers are writing windows vista sidebar
> gadgets. The rest are writing .net apps."
>
> You'fre an idiot and moron capin' crunch!...LOL!
> Frank

"Clear Windows" <> wrote in message
news:485864ca$...
> you are an idiot....

I'm not an idiot. I have the proof to disprove your accusation.
>
> you are clueless

Wrong, Douche Bag. I have plenty of clues. That is why I can spot a retard
like yourself a mile away.

>
> you are repulsive

Wrong again. Did you sleep through the day? Are you out of medication? Is
your poor Sheep running away from you?

>
> you are a freakshow
>

Sorry. I don't do Las Vegas shows. I would rather fight retards here in
Vista land.
>
> get lost bastard

Sorry again. You are batting 1,000 you moron. My parents were married.
You should run to Ubuntu. That is your style.

>
>
>
>
> "Frank" <> wrote in message
> news:48585720$0$4272$...
>> Clear Windows wrote:
>>
>> ---------------------------------
>>
>> Read the article asshole. Or just continue to make a fool out of
>> yourself.
>>
>> Now also read the comments:
>>
>> "Wow... this article doesn't make any sense.
>>
>> What, exactly, is a "Vista application"? Is it an application that is
>> written with .NET 3.0+ using WPF, because those run just fine on XP.
>>
>> In fact, I can't really think of a single development platform that runs
>> on Vista, but not on XP.
>>
>> So what is this poll measuring? Is it measuring that lack of adoption of
>> WPF? If so, I agree, that's a problem"
>>
>> "I am not a programmer, but even I understand that programmers are
>> writing code to .Net and not a specific OS.
>>
>> ActiveWin ought to start a category for stupidest article - this one gets
>> my vote"
>>
>> "In related news... 8% of developers are writing windows vista sidebar
>> gadgets. The rest are writing .net apps."
>>
>> You'fre an idiot and moron capin' crunch!...LOL!
>> Frank
>

Clear Windows wrote:

I am an idiot....

I am clueless

I am repulsive

I am a freakshow

I should get lost as I am a bastard.
So where is the door?

----------------------------------------
I agree!
Frank

On Jun 17, 8:54*pm, "Spanky deMonkey" <spa...@deMonkey.net> wrote:
> "Clear Windows" <carlfered...@wizzmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:485864ca$...
>
> > you are an idiot....
>
> I'm not an idiot. *I have the proof to disprove your accusation.
> - Show quoted text -

Of couse you are an idiot. You post under multiple names and freaked
when you were outed. I asked the other pile of **** Bill, now I'm
asking you. Why would anyone in their right mind support this
newsgorup's biggest asshole Frank?
Everybody else in the newsgroup either ignores you three simpletons or
****es all over you three idiots day after day. I guess you morons
haven't noticed or you like getting ****ed on. Which is it?

executioner wrote:

> On Jun 17, 8:54 pm, "Spanky deMonkey" <spa...@deMonkey.net> wrote:
>
>>"Clear Windows" <carlfered...@wizzmail.com> wrote in message
>>
>>news:485864ca$...
>>
>>
>>>you are an idiot....
>>
>>I'm not an idiot. I have the proof to disprove your accusation.
>>- Show quoted text -
>
>
> Of couse you are an idiot.

I bet you can prove that you're not mentally deranged or insane right?
The institution you just got out gave you a "certificate" stating just
that, right?

You post under multiple names and freaked
> when you were outed.

"Outed"? You been hiding in the closet huh?

I asked the other pile of **** Bill, now I'm
> asking you. Why would anyone in their right mind support this
> newsgorup's biggest asshole Frank?

"Support"? You mean like paying me? Or do you mean like kicking asshole
losers asses like you?
Well?

> Everybody else in the newsgroup either ignores you three simpletons or
> ****es all over you three idiots day after day.

So you still haven't figured out how to use kill file huh?
You're really stupid!

I guess you morons
> haven't noticed or you like getting ****ed on.

You must like to having your nuts crushed and your ass kicked cause
that's all we've been doing to you ever since you stuck you nose in here!
Ouch!
I bet that hurts!

Which is it?

You tell us? Do you prefer having your ass kicked or your nuts crushed
cause you've come to the right place and we're the right people to
accommodate you!
Loser!!
Frank
>