Ross M. Greenberg wrote:
> It's just that restricting such control is sort of silly: I know more than a
> few people with home networks. The inability for them to be able to set
> even such gross control as allowing permissions to be set to provide for a
> User A to maintain files for User B ends up prohibiting even the most
> rudimentary maintenance. I would think that for any home network that such
> simple maintenance needs to be performed, yet Vista Home Premium -- not Home
> Basic -- prohibits this?
>
> Now, I admit my particular situation (Ultimate talking to Home Premium) may
> be a bit unique, but there should be alternatives available, for going off a
> Microsoft reservation looks to be the only viable alternative that allows me
> to accomplish something that was easily accomplished under XP, even under
> the same XP<-> Vista connection.
I'm not going to argue with your grumble. An operating system is not a
religion, it is a tool. Use the operating system that fits your needs
best. Even though I support every MS operating system, including Server
(yes, I still support DOS and Win9x/ME!), I have used SUSE exclusively
for my own work for 7 years until I switched to OS X this past January.
That's why I say there are always choices. ;-)
Malke
--
Elephant Boy Computers
www.elephantboycomputers.com
"Don't Panic!"
MS-MVP Windows - Shell/User