Stephan Rose wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 16:02:23 -0500, The poster formerly known as Nina
> DiBoy wrote:
>
>> Stephan Rose wrote:
>>> On Tue, 26 Jun 2007 22:44:32 -0500, The poster formerly known as Nina
>>> DiBoy wrote:
>>>
>>>> Peter Foldes wrote:
>>>>> If you turn on your External USB HD then obviously Windows Vista
>>>> > detects a hardware change. Each and every time you do open Vista
>>>> > with the USB HD turned off it will detect a change and this goes
>>>> > for when you open with the ESB HD.
>>>>> To avoid this activate with the USB HD connected and on and leave
>>>> > it on. If you shut it off and then you boot without it being on
>>>> > you will go through the same cycle. One or the other.
>>>> OK, that's too much. Not even MS is that stupid to build activation to
>>>> behave so, at least I have a hard time swallowing it. That has to be a
>>>> bug. I can't imagine that they would build it that way by design. They
>>>> would totally be shooting themselves in the foot by doing it this way.
>>> I just have 3 words to say in response:
>>>
>>> "I love Ubuntu."
>>>
>> I definately see alot of good things in Ubuntu, but I actually already
>> love Fedora. 
>>
>> I still think we would see more and hear more about this kind of problem
>> if WPA/WGA/N was built this way by design. I personally think that the
>> OP's DRM went buggy which is really not much better anyway.
>>
>
> Well you know, stuff like that is why I refuse to run Vista though.
I'm on board there. I don't have vista installed or running at the
moment. I just removed it from a dual boot on my machine and I'm
planning to move it to a virtual machine soon, but no hurry. I have it
for only 2 reasons. It didn't cost me a dime, and I will unfortunately
be supporting it eventually.
> I
> simply can't risk running into problems like that at work. Hell, I don't
> even want to boot into XP anymore. On that note...I actually haven't
> booted into XP for about a week now at work. For some odd reason, my blood
> pressure has been lower for about a week now too.
>
> Coincidence?
>
> I actually wonder if MS will implement any of their WGA/WPA/etc. into the
> server 2008? I mean if so...who in their right mind would run a server
> with it? Not that I consider it sane to run a server with *any* version of
> windows but....just saying...
>
Sure they will, it goes without question. They did in windows server
2003, so I don't see why they wouldn't in server 2008.
--
Priceless quotes in m.p.w.vista.general group:
http://protectfreedom.tripod.com/kick.html
Most recent idiotic quote added to KICK (Klassic Idiotic Caption Kooks):
"They hacked the Microsoft website to make it think a linux box was a
windows box. Thats called hacking. People who do hacking are called
hackers."
"Good poets borrow; great poets steal."
- T. S. Eliot