In most cases, you shouldn't have issues with the resources.
--
Ryan Sokolowski
MVP - Clustering
MCT, MCITP x3, MCTS x8, MCSE x2, CCNA, CCDA, BCFP
"Binu" <> wrote in message
news:923AD61A-C884-4002-BFB4-...
> Thanks for your suggestions..here my doubt is that after patching first
> node,
> will it create issues to move resources to other node? because there will
> be
> patch level difference between nodes in cluster..
>
> "Ryan Sokolowski [MVP]" wrote:
>
>> Active-Active simply means that you have separate instances of SQL
>> running
>> on each node (in this case). Fail over one instance to the other node,
>> patch the now passive node, reverse the process and repeat.
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>> --Ryan
>>
>> --
>> Ryan Sokolowski
>> MVP - Clustering
>> MCT, MCITP x3, MCTS x8, MCSE x2, CCNA, CCDA, BCFP
>>
>>
>> "Binu" <> wrote in message
>> news:75B0303B-7916-4A26-A087-...
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I have one Active-Active 2003 cluster..I would like to rebuild both the
>> > machines with latest version of SP..At present clusterr has SQL
>> > instances
>> > running and how can I do it with minimum down time as customer won't
>> > give
>> > both nodes same time for rebuild..I have to do it one by one..
>> >
>> > Any suggestions?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>>
>>
|