Hello RW,
For 1 see ADMT v3.1 installed on Windows server 2008 and yes it will be the
cleanest solution:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/d...displaylang=en
For 2:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...75(WS.10).aspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...08(WS.10).aspx
http://techrepublic.com.com/5208-623...229757&start=0
For 3:
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...31(WS.10).aspx
If a CA is installed on a domain controller domain rename would not be possible,
doesn't matter if Windows server 2003 or Windows server 2008 is used. Here
are the CA parts form the links above.
2003:
"Certification authorities (CAs): Management of enterprise certificates through
a domain rename procedure requires that CAs not be installed on domain controllers
and that they be configured with appropriate Uniform Resource Locators (URLs)."
2008:
"The CAs are not installed on domain controllers"
Best regards
Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!!
http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
> I have inherited network administration with single label domain name,
> currently on 2003 level. There is many issues with running single
> label
> domain which I do not want to go over here, we have lot of projects in
> near
> futer that are required to install AD integrated software and before
> we will
> proceed with this project I'd like to upgrade domain to 2008 and at
> the same
> time use new FQDN so here is my dilema which way to go:
> 1. create new 2008 domain and migrate users, objects, etc. using MS
> migration tool
> 2. rename existing 2003 domain then upgrade to 2008
> 3. upgrade existing to 2008 and rename
> I think opt. 1 would be the cleanest one but would like to confirm and
> ask
> for any good references how to do this step-by-step
> we run DFS and CA from list of potentially affected solutions, no
> exchange
> srv.
> comments?
>