There are advantages and disadvantages to both options. Some that I can
think of off the top of my head:
1 bigger cluster:
Advantages - Potentially less cost. You have the option to add only 1 node
for your file sharing and use the passive from your existing 2 node cluster.
Disadvantages - A loss of quorum takes down both applications. Potential
performance issues should all resources fail over to a single node. Adds
complexity, requires SAN and heartbeat networks.
2 separate clusters:
Advantages - Potentially better performance and higher availablility. Can
use a crossover cable for heartbeat network on clusters (can't do this with
3+ node cluster).
Disadvantages - Cost.
I'm sure there are other plusses/minuses. Hope this helps.
Regards,
John
Visit my blog:
http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner
"Bad Beagle" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> Is there any advantage to creating a new cluster or is it better to to
just
> add file services to services and application?
> "John Toner [MVP]" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> > Each cluster must have its own disk resources.
> >
> > Regards,
> > John
> >
> > Visit my blog: http://msmvps.com/blogs/jtoner
> >
> > "Bad Beagle" <> wrote in message
> > news:eP2c%...
> >> I currently have a 2 node print cluster and would like to add file
> >> cluster
> >> to the server as well. Does the 2nd cluster require its own witness
disk
> > or
> >> can it share the same witness disk as the Print cluster. The disks are
> > all
> >> on the same SAN.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>