correct, because exchange 2003 also takes care to solve the issue
--
Cheers,
(HOPEFULLY THIS INFORMATION HELPS YOU!)
# Jorge de Almeida Pinto # MVP Identity & Access - Directory Services #
BLOG (WEB-BASED)-->
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/default.aspx
BLOG (RSS-FEEDS)-->
http://blogs.dirteam.com/blogs/jorge/rss.aspx
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* How to ask a question -->
http://support.microsoft.com/?id=555375
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties and confers no rights!
* Always test ANY suggestion in a test environment before implementing!
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
#################################################
#################################################
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Gueorgui Dimov" <> wrote in message
news:uA%23iDdW%...
> there is a section
> here(http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...61.aspx#BKMK_4)
> about compatibility problems when exchange 2000 is installed in 2000
> forests.
>
> If we use exchange 2003sp2 am I correct to assume that I do not need to
> worry about mangled attributes?
>
> G
>