Advanced settings

I don't understand why Microsoft don't give options (settings) for more
advanced users. For example System restore -> in XP you can set the storage
it can use in vista it is all automated. It's good to be that priority for
unexpirienced users but for others who then like to set it up like they want
it's better to have mopre options. Or Backup it was much better for more
expirienced users in XP. And so on...
I also ask myself why Microsoft don't develop a download manager for IE
which could then resume downloads and other things

----------------
This post is a suggestion for Microsoft, and Microsoft responds to the
suggestions with the most votes. To vote for this suggestion, click the "I
Agree" button in the message pane. If you do not see the button, follow this
link to open the suggestion in the Microsoft Web-based Newsreader and then
click "I Agree" in the message pane.

http://windowshelp.microsoft.com/com....vista.general

MaliGogi <>'s wild
thoughts were released on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:20:00 -0700
bearing the following fruit:

>I don't understand why Microsoft don't give options (settings) for more
>advanced users. For example System restore -> in XP you can set the storage
>it can use in vista it is all automated.

Not sure what you're saying. If you mean assign how much
disk space it uses then you can set that in Vista too.

> It's good to be that priority for
>unexpirienced users but for others who then like to set it up like they want
>it's better to have mopre options. Or Backup it was much better for more
>expirienced users in XP. And so on...
>I also ask myself why Microsoft don't develop a download manager for IE
>which could then resume downloads and other things

For me IE has been playing catch up with Firefox and Opera.
I only use if for MS sites that don't work with FF or Opera.

IMO it really needs some work to compete.
--
Jan Hyde

https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Jan.Hyde

Well i know you could adjust it but only in command prompt (in XP it's
definetely simplier). But for specific folder you cannot turn it on or off,
just for whole disks. Or I don't know how.

"Jan Hyde (VB MVP)" wrote:

> MaliGogi <>'s wild
> thoughts were released on Tue, 21 Aug 2007 05:20:00 -0700
> bearing the following fruit:
>
> >I don't understand why Microsoft don't give options (settings) for more
> >advanced users. For example System restore -> in XP you can set the storage
> >it can use in vista it is all automated.
>
> Not sure what you're saying. If you mean assign how much
> disk space it uses then you can set that in Vista too.
>
> > It's good to be that priority for
> >unexpirienced users but for others who then like to set it up like they want
> >it's better to have mopre options. Or Backup it was much better for more
> >expirienced users in XP. And so on...
> >I also ask myself why Microsoft don't develop a download manager for IE
> >which could then resume downloads and other things
>
> For me IE has been playing catch up with Firefox and Opera.
> I only use if for MS sites that don't work with FF or Opera.
>
> IMO it really needs some work to compete.
> --
> Jan Hyde
>
> https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Jan.Hyde
>

"MaliGogi" <> wrote in message
news:5F39D48C-4BF1-41AC-8123-...
> Well i know you could adjust it but only in command prompt (in XP it's
> definetely simplier). But for specific folder you cannot turn it on or
> off,
> just for whole disks. Or I don't know how.

What would the point of that be? You did know that System Restore is only
meant to record changes to system files?

Adjusting the amount of disk space it uses is the only useful thing that a
user can adjust.

ss.

"MaliGogi" <> wrote in message
news:76ECF02B-AE95-4258-A564-...
>I don't understand why Microsoft don't give options (settings) for more
> advanced users. For example System restore -> in XP you can set the
> storage
> it can use in vista it is all automated. It's good to be that priority for
> unexpirienced users but for others who then like to set it up like they
> want
> it's better to have mopre options. Or Backup it was much better for more
> expirienced users in XP. And so on...
> I also ask myself why Microsoft don't develop a download manager for IE
> which could then resume downloads and other things


It would be nice if there was a download manager in IE, but when I am
downloading something big I use Orbit Download Manager. It's free, and can
download in multiple streams, so it can download much faster from large
sites with a lot of capacity that is throttled. It resumes as well of
course, and can also download video streams from some websites. I only run
it when I need it though, as I find it gets in the way with everyday small
downloads.

http://www.orbitdownloader.com/

ss.

> I also ask myself why Microsoft don't develop a download manager for IE
> which could then resume downloads and other things

Be thankful they have not developed a download manager for IE. It
would not work (properly or efficiently), would have security holes
and very likely would prevent 3rd party download managers from being
used.