Yeah, ghosts... I can believe that. Isn't it interesting that to learn
about Vista you have to use Google.
John
NetLink_Blue wrote:
> This post just kills me. John, your muddled misunderstanding and froggy
> native-boy innocence as you detonate the time_bomb known as Vista
> reminds me so much of ... me.
>
> John, your "desktop" folder is a virtual folder. If you Google vista
> virtual folders you can spend a day learning all kinds of neat things
> about these new "ghost" folders. And, Desktop ghost folder is not the
> only ghost folder you have built-in under Vista. When you start
> deleting / moving these folders you have entered the *danger zone* .
>
> Like yourself, I was fascinated by 64-bit Windows. Right off the bat, I
> figured 64-bit had to be at least twice as good as 32-bit. This is a
> myth, when experienced in the real world. I don't pull my pants down
> over my head when I try to put them on. And so right now I am sticking
> with 32-bit Windows -- as a practical matter.
>
> --- I was going to triple-boot between 32-bit Winxp & Vista AND 64-bit
> Vista, but decided against it. I did have 64-bit Vista installed for a
> couple of days, just to see what I could see. Now a bit of sanity has
> returned.
>
>
> "John" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>
>> I double click the c drive under My Computer. The left pane (whatever
>> that is) starts with a thing called "Desktop." What is that? The first
>> thing under Desktop is my user folder, I think.But my user file is
>> also under c:\users and neither one is a shortcut. It turns out that
>> if I delete one of them I delete both of them. How does that work?
>>
>> What kind of "folder" is Desktop such that it can point to a file (or
>> whatever it does) and pretend (or something) the file is really there
>> to the extent that a delete in one deletes the other? Or maybe the
>> questions is, what kind of files are the user files? Maybe it's
>> similar to the search thingy that has that delete the search-delete
>> the file attribute.
>
> Google vista virtual folders to get a handle on the above vexing mystery
> ...
>
>
>> I didn't notice till updating to 64 bit. I don't use desktop at all. I
>> have my own way of displaying data and programs using Objectdoct. If I
>> could, I'd disable and/or delete windows desktop entirely. I gather
>> when I use Objectdock it disables windows desktop.
>
> No it does not. I assume you are referring to Stardock's Objectdock
> program, which replicates Apple's Mac OS X "dock" on PC's. If I
> remember, ODock can "hide" your desktop icons. OD does not do away with
> Windows desktop. Windows desktop is built into Vista. Why do you hate
> your desktop folder so much, John? This baffles me. Did it painfully
> kick you in the groin?
>
>> I want my small 64 bit drive to point to the user file on the vista 32
>> bit drive co-installed. I learned how to do it sort of but it looks
>> exactly as if there are TWO of everything on the 64 bit drive; two
>> user files, two document files, two picture files etc... all the same.
>> So which do I change to point to the 32 bit drive. Or maybe both? It's
>> really confusing.
>
> You ain't just whistling Dixie it's (you are) confusing. Have you
> actually installed Vista 64-bit OS? Along-side your 32-bit Vista? If
> not, what do you mean "my small 64 bit drive" and your "vista 32 bit
> drive"?
>
>> Eventually the 32 bit drive will become just a data drive but I want
>> it functional, bootable, while I slowly install everything on the 64
>> bit drive. Have to do that since Microsoft never figured out how to
>> upgrade the 32 bit to 64 bit.
>
> Geez John. What you are asking for is impossible ( at best impractical
> -- like putting your pants on over your head). Surely this is where
> your understanding of Windows OS's and 64/32 bit "bitness" is muddled,
> goofy and off-the-charts illogical.
>
>> Anyway. I somehow got my entire 32 bit user file onto the 64 bit under
>> Desktop, sort of. It looked like Desktop/userfile/userfile with the
>> second userfile under the first and holding the data on the 32 bit
>> drive. Nice, bu confusing. Then I also got the documents folder under
>> 64 bit users,myfile documents to point to documents under the 32 bit
>> users. So, I decided that would be a neater way to go so I just
>> deleted the 32 bit user file under 64 bit Desktop cause it wouldn't be
>> needed. Well... you guessed it, it not only deleted it from the 64 bit
>> Desktop, it also deleted it from the 32 bit user file on the other
>> drive. Have no idea how it was connected like that. it seemed to have
>> volume and take space on the 64 bit drive and certainly didn't show up
>> as a shortcut under properties.
>
> Sounds like you are messing around with ghost folders (virtual folders).
> Not even God can understand what you did on your system. Well ... that
> may be overstating things a bit.
>
>> Luckily, having dinged around with Microsoft stuff a long time I had
>> the foresight to have a second cloned disk of the 32 bit drive so I
>> could go back and get ALL my stuff that Microsoft deleted from two
>> drives at once. I just had this hunch that anything connected to
>> something run by Microsoft could get screwed up.
>
> DING! dinged! Yes, I think I see a connection here ... between John
> and dinged. :`)
>
>> So, again... what kind of "thing" is the thing called "Desktop" that
>> appears first under the drive letter when you click on the drive
>> letter in explorer?
>>
>> John
>
> Virtual folder? That would be my guess.
>
> Don't feel bad, I have a good friend who just hates Windows shortcuts.
> Maybe he has wrapped his mind around this concept by now. Different
> strokes for different folks.
>
> onward thru the fog,
> Net Blue
>
|