Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista General Discussion > Arbitrary changes

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Arbitrary changes

 
 
rraplee
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-07-2007
I have been using Windows since before (aka DOS) and with each iteration
there are arbitrary changes made to the interface. Changes to "find",
"search", "control panel" etc., etc., etc., are aggravating and do not add to
the usability of the interface. Please decide some of these questions among
your "engineers" once and for all and leave them be!
--
rcr
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Rick Rogers
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-07-2007
Hi,

Changes to the user interface (UI) are based on usability studies done with
hundreds of randomly selected participants. Some of them may be industry
professionals, but just as many are people from everyday mainstream life.
They are not based on indeterminate discretionary decisions made by
engineers. Were that the case we would all still be using a CLI.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com

"rraplee" <robert.not > wrote in message
news:B3F3821A-FC6D-4210-8693-...
>I have been using Windows since before (aka DOS) and with each iteration
> there are arbitrary changes made to the interface. Changes to "find",
> "search", "control panel" etc., etc., etc., are aggravating and do not add
> to
> the usability of the interface. Please decide some of these questions
> among
> your "engineers" once and for all and leave them be!
> --
> rcr


 
Reply With Quote
 
Christopher R. Lee
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-07-2007
You must be joking!

Would you expect the pedals of your motor car to change positions with each
new model?

Of course, I'm exaggerating: I change my car less often than MS changes its
operating systems.

Regards


"Rick Rogers" <> a écrit dans le message de
news:%...
> Hi,
>
> Changes to the user interface (UI) are based on usability studies done
> with hundreds of randomly selected participants. Some of them may be
> industry professionals, but just as many are people from everyday
> mainstream life. They are not based on indeterminate discretionary
> decisions made by engineers. Were that the case we would all still be
> using a CLI.
>
> --
> Best of Luck,
>
> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
> Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
> My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com
>
> "rraplee" <robert.not > wrote in message
> news:B3F3821A-FC6D-4210-8693-...
>>I have been using Windows since before (aka DOS) and with each iteration
>> there are arbitrary changes made to the interface. Changes to "find",
>> "search", "control panel" etc., etc., etc., are aggravating and do not
>> add to
>> the usability of the interface. Please decide some of these questions
>> among
>> your "engineers" once and for all and leave them be!
>> --
>> rcr

>


 
Reply With Quote
 
Michael Jennings
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-07-2007
They could get rid of the steering column. Why should the front seat passenger
have the only death seat? This is not sharing - the driver needs a death seat too.
Equity demands that the driver have nothing to hold on to other than the steering
joy stick, or some other fairly innovative side positioned motor car pointer.

"Christopher R. Lee" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> You must be joking!
>
> Would you expect the pedals of your motor car to change positions with each new model?
>
> Of course, I'm exaggerating: I change my car less often than MS changes its operating
> systems.
>
> Regards
>
>
> "Rick Rogers" <> a écrit dans le message de
> news:%...
>> Hi,
>>
>> Changes to the user interface (UI) are based on usability studies done with hundreds of
>> randomly selected participants. Some of them may be industry professionals, but just as
>> many are people from everyday mainstream life. They are not based on indeterminate
>> discretionary decisions made by engineers. Were that the case we would all still be using
>> a CLI.
>>
>> --
>> Best of Luck,
>>
>> Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
>> http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
>> Windows help - www.rickrogers.org
>> My thoughts http://rick-mvp.blogspot.com
>>
>> "rraplee" <robert.not > wrote in message
>> news:B3F3821A-FC6D-4210-8693-...
>>>I have been using Windows since before (aka DOS) and with each iteration
>>> there are arbitrary changes made to the interface. Changes to "find",
>>> "search", "control panel" etc., etc., etc., are aggravating and do not add to
>>> the usability of the interface. Please decide some of these questions among
>>> your "engineers" once and for all and leave them be!
>>> --
>>> rcr

>>

>



 
Reply With Quote
 
rraplee
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-09-2007
The replies I saw earlier, including by a MS engineer (or what?) did not
address my concerns. My point is that a GUI is supposed to simplify NOT
complicate. I fully understand CLI (at least you have a good idea of what to
expect) but that changes to the GUI lead to unexpected results. I don't
think that's right. Here's an example:
jimcas...@usa.com" <jimcasadausa...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote
in message news:7AB056B2-6F84-49F7-9EB0-


> I can't find the little yellow 'up' one file button on Vista
> Explorer. On XP, it's just right of the back & forward buttons.
> Surely, they wouldn't eliminate it on Vista. Did they move it or do
> I need to do something to enable it?



It is there, improved, and in a different form.

You just click on the second to last location in the address bar (breadcrumb
navigation).



--
rcr


"rraplee" wrote:

> I have been using Windows since before (aka DOS) and with each iteration
> there are arbitrary changes made to the interface. Changes to "find",
> "search", "control panel" etc., etc., etc., are aggravating and do not add to
> the usability of the interface. Please decide some of these questions among
> your "engineers" once and for all and leave them be!
> --
> rcr

 
Reply With Quote
 
rraplee
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-09-2007
And here is another example found in the discussions on minutes later:

http://groups.google.com/group/micro...dc6507a0de36b6
--
rcr


"rraplee" wrote:

> I have been using Windows since before (aka DOS) and with each iteration
> there are arbitrary changes made to the interface. Changes to "find",
> "search", "control panel" etc., etc., etc., are aggravating and do not add to
> the usability of the interface. Please decide some of these questions among
> your "engineers" once and for all and leave them be!
> --
> rcr

 
Reply With Quote
 
rraplee
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      10-09-2007
I'm sure I shouldn't reply to my own posts but the point is that one must
search AGAIN searching in the system and "hidden" areas to find what one was
looking for in the first place.
--
rcr


"rraplee" wrote:

> And here is another example found in the discussions on minutes later:
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/micro...dc6507a0de36b6
> --
> rcr
>
>
> "rraplee" wrote:
>
> > I have been using Windows since before (aka DOS) and with each iteration
> > there are arbitrary changes made to the interface. Changes to "find",
> > "search", "control panel" etc., etc., etc., are aggravating and do not add to
> > the usability of the interface. Please decide some of these questions among
> > your "engineers" once and for all and leave them be!
> > --
> > rcr

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there a way to launch processes with arbitrary MIC labels? Walter Porter Windows Vista Security 2 10-13-2006 05:09 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59