H. G. Cooper wrote:
> http://www.itwire.com/content/view/12147/1101/
>
> and page 2
>
> http://www.itwire.com/content/view/12147/1101/1/1/
>
> So far, Transit has been using Vista Business full-time for a fortnight. And
> so far, we've found nothing that works better than in Windows XP, dozens of
> things that are annoyingly different without being a functional improvement,
> and several things that work at best intermittently and at worst not at all.
> On the whole, we wish we'd never moved.
>
> See the full article on the links above
>
>
Ok smartass...here a just a few greatly improved functions in Vista that
are not in XP.
1) the sync center is far ahead of anything that XP has. In XP it's a
nightmare time consuming mess. It's one click in Vista.
2) since it's the holidays and may people are taking digital photos try
inserting your SD (or whatever) card into XP...now using the default
reader...you'll click thru five different dialogue before the pics can
be viewed.
Now do the same with Vista..voila...one dialogue comes up and no
clicking...view the pics. Much FASTER then XP!
3) and little things like clicking on view in XP only opens up the view
choices, whereas in Vista clicking on view actually changes the view.
There are dozens of these little, yet very nice FUNCTIONAL changes in
Vista vs XP. In fact, once you use Vista for a while, then go to XP...XP
seems so old and clunky.
Now the "speed" thing....it often times takes more clicks in XP just to
get to where you want to be to simply start a task than it does in
Vista...so Vista can be finished before XP has even started.
Vista is a superior OS compared XP in just about every way imaginable.
Of course, you have to actually use Vista to know the difference.
Frank