Jerry wrote:
> Ron Miller wrote:
>> I ran all the beta versions with an X800XL, and Vista recognized that
>> very similar card every time. Before installing the RTM version,
>> though, I upgraded to an X1950 Pro, and it was UNrecognized, just like
>> yours. I could hardly believe it, considering how well the betas had
>> handled ATI cards. I downloaded the Vista-compatible signed Catalyst
>> (7.1) from ATI and ran its Setup program. After a reboot, Device
>> Manager showed the display adapter to be a "Radeon X1950 Pro," and the
>> Vista User-Experience rating for the card rose from 1.0 to 5.9. I had
>> a nasty time getting my primary and secondary monitors assigned to
>> their proper roles, but there was no trouble installing the Catalyst
>> Control Center and driver.
>> (The CCC requires .NET Framework to be present before it's installed,
>> and I cannot recall if the proper version is present in Vista by
>> default. That is, I may have had to fiddle around with .NET prior to
>> installing the Catalyst, but I've spent so many hours tweaking this
>> installation over the last 4 days that I cannot recall for sure
>> whether I did so or not.)
>>
>> At this point, if the Programs applet in Control Panel shows any ATI
>> apps or drivers, uninstall them, reboot, and try the Catalyst 7.1
>> Setup again.
>
> The ATI program wouldn't uninstall so I went through the registry and
> deleted everything there as well as thprogram directory, rebooted and
> reran the CCC installation. Same result- stuck in the detecing hardware
> phase. As far as I know .Net 3.0 is part of Vista. I don't know how to
> find out or what I might fiddle with if it was.
I didn't watch the setup screen every second of the installation, but I
wasn't even aware of a hardware-detection phase. Considering that
everyone else with ATI-based X8xx cards is getting them to work, could
this problem have anything to do with the manufacturer of the card? I
don't have the entire thread, so I can't go back to learn who your
manufacturer is.
The difference between your experience and mine is that my X1950 Pro was
"seen" in Device Manager. It was labeled simply "VGA" or something, I
can't recall for sure, but at least a display adapter appeared. Also,
have you tried reseating the card itself so as to be positive that
there's no mechanical or electrical problem?
|