The audio stack in Windows Vista has been completely rewritten

you can find the people to blame for the vista audio fiasco here:

http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=116347

Good boy, you can cut and paste. Mommy did a good job teaching you.


"Lano DeMentar" <> wrote in message
news:...
> you can find the people to blame for the vista audio fiasco here:
>
> http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=116347
>

Yanair.. although you are a blundering fool,

its ok having people like you around saying nonsense and making fools of
yourselves.
I support it!

Freedom like we have in Usenet is very important, and even if idiots like
you are around, the benefits of freedom outweigh the nuisances.



"Bill Yanaire" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Good boy, you can cut and paste. Mommy did a good job teaching you.
>
>
> "Lano DeMentar" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> you can find the people to blame for the vista audio fiasco here:
>>
>> http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=116347
>>
>
>

Hey dipshit, what is your ****ing problem, acne playing up or something ?

another retard with a complex for the kill file

kerrrplunk

"Bill Yanaire" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Good boy, you can cut and paste. Mommy did a good job teaching you.
>
>
> "Lano DeMentar" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> you can find the people to blame for the vista audio fiasco here:
>>
>> http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=116347
>>
>
>

"Bill Yanaire" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Good boy, you can cut and paste. Mommy did a good job teaching you.
>
>
> "Lano DeMentar" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> you can find the people to blame for the vista audio fiasco here:
>>
>> http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=116347
>>
>
>
you also need to take a lesson about top posting dumbass

Why do you insist on forcing me to reread content that I just read before I clicked your reply?

--

Steve Easton


"Dr. Hackenbush" <> wrote in message
news:iaLri.693$...
>
> "Bill Yanaire" <> wrote in message news:...
>> Good boy, you can cut and paste. Mommy did a good job teaching you.
>>
>>
>> "Lano DeMentar" <> wrote in message news:...
>>> you can find the people to blame for the vista audio fiasco here:
>>>
>>> http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=116347
>>>
>>
>>
> you also need to take a lesson about top posting dumbass
>

Speak for yourself. You are just as insulting if not more.


"Lano DeMentar" <> wrote in message
news:...
> Yanair.. although you are a blundering fool,
>
> its ok having people like you around saying nonsense and making fools of
> yourselves.
> I support it!
>
> Freedom like we have in Usenet is very important, and even if idiots like
> you are around, the benefits of freedom outweigh the nuisances.
>
>
>
> "Bill Yanaire" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> Good boy, you can cut and paste. Mommy did a good job teaching you.
>>
>>
>> "Lano DeMentar" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>> you can find the people to blame for the vista audio fiasco here:
>>>
>>> http://channel9.msdn.com/Showpost.aspx?postid=116347
>>>
>>
>>
>
>

On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:43:50 -0400, "Steve Easton"
<> wrote:

>Why do you insist on forcing me to reread content that I just read before I clicked your reply?

Why do top poster think whatever they say deserves to appear ahead of
what others have already contributed to the thread?

Nobody forces you to do anything. Amazing top posters apparently
haven't discovered how to use the scroll bar.

The biggest reason for bottom posting aside from the FACT that the
English language was designed to be read left to right and top to
bottom is you never know when somebody first joins the thread. If
everybody used the PROPER bottom posting method everyone post's would
appear in chronological order. Only ignorant and or arrogant Bozos top
post because they have the nerve to think only what they just posted
matters.

"Adam Albright" <> wrote in message news:...
> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:43:50 -0400, "Steve Easton"
> <> wrote:
>
>>Why do you insist on forcing me to reread content that I just read before I clicked your reply?
>
> Why do top poster think whatever they say deserves to appear ahead of
> what others have already contributed to the thread?
>
> Nobody forces you to do anything. Amazing top posters apparently
> haven't discovered how to use the scroll bar.

Why should i have to scroll?

> The biggest reason for bottom posting aside from the FACT that the
> English language was designed to be read left to right and top to
> bottom is you never know when somebody first joins the thread.

Sure you know when they joined. All you have to do is follw the thread headers.

If
> everybody used the PROPER bottom posting method everyone post's would
> appear in chronological order. Only ignorant and or arrogant Bozos top
> post because they have the nerve to think only what they just posted
> matters.
>
Then why is it that in paper correspondence, the reply or "addition" is always
the top most piece of paper with the original attached as an enclosure behind or under
the response?

--

Steve Easton

On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 16:29:54 -0400, "Steve Easton"
<> wrote:

>
>"Adam Albright" <> wrote in message news:...
>> On Tue, 31 Jul 2007 14:43:50 -0400, "Steve Easton"
>> <> wrote:
>>
>>>Why do you insist on forcing me to reread content that I just read before I clicked your reply?
>>
>> Why do top poster think whatever they say deserves to appear ahead of
>> what others have already contributed to the thread?
>>
>> Nobody forces you to do anything. Amazing top posters apparently
>> haven't discovered how to use the scroll bar.
>
>Why should i have to scroll?

Why do you turn a page with a newspaper, magazine or book?
>
>> The biggest reason for bottom posting aside from the FACT that the
>> English language was designed to be read left to right and top to
>> bottom is you never know when somebody first joins the thread.
>
>Sure you know when they joined. All you have to do is follw the thread headers.

Not every one views newsgroups in threaded mode. I don't. I find it
better for me to sort by author. Others may sort by date, etc..
>
>If
>> everybody used the PROPER bottom posting method everyone post's would
>> appear in chronological order. Only ignorant and or arrogant Bozos top
>> post because they have the nerve to think only what they just posted
>> matters.
>>
>Then why is it that in paper correspondence, the reply or "addition" is always
>the top most piece of paper with the original attached as an enclosure behind or under
>the response?

It isn't. You need to expand your horizons.