"Charlie Wilkes" <> wrote in message
news

...
> "At the end of the decade, when Microsoft's executives look back at the
> debacle that was Windows Vista, they'll see that simply slapping a fresh
> coat of paint on an otherwise aging Windows architecture wasn't enough to
> fool anybody. Let's hope they also realize that, as with any major
> update, they needed to make their case to IT. Focusing on consumers while
> ignoring their enterprise customers, and assuming IT shops would simply
> fall in line, was no way to execute a platform migration."
>
> http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/index....;1;fp;2;fpid;2
> __________________________________________________ ______________________
>
> This is an interesting article that will put to rest any nagging doubts
> experienced by those who have opted to stick with XP.
>
> Charlie
Nagging doubts? Well, I might agree that I wouldn't run a Vista upgrade
install. Just like many of the folks who tried to run the OS X Leopard
upgrade on a box running OS X Tiger. Never have trusted OS upgrades; way too
messy.
But if you mean just moving from XP to Vista... no problems here. I've done
clean Vista installs on at least six different Dell models and Vista's run
solid as a rock on all systems. I've got Vista running on a Mac Pro here...
runs great. For real.
And... c'mon... while MS didn't deliver on all the promises about Vista that
they made six or seven years ago, Vista is definitely more than "...simply
slapping a fresh coat of paint..." on XP. Anyone who thinks otherwise simply
doesn't care to acknowledge the differences between XP and Vista.
All this coming from a guy who spends most of his leisure time in OS X
10.5.2 these days...
Lang