Malke;1077798 Wrote:
> shawn wrote:
>
> > Users sometime won't write all data to server, plus working on data
> may
> > slow. Since we don't like roaming profile, then Boss likes to backup
> > profiles from each workstations to server.
>
> If working on the data is slow, you should upgrade the RAM on the
> server and
> possibly your network infrastructure. Boss should understand that
> keeping
> data on workstations is inefficient, makes backing up harder and more
> prone
> to errors and omissions, and increases traffic over the network.
How about vice versa?
Roaming profiles is a feature which is so unusable that its almost "not
working feature".
I don't recommend to use it at all, and thats why their boss skipped it
in the first place and it was right move.
Profiles get bigger and bigger over time and when those are few
gigabytes you dont want users to wait whole day when their computers
load profiles from server.
And in worst case there are several people doing it at the same time.
Of course you COULD restrict profile size with group policies but what
if there is big ego chief customers which are going mad because they
cant do something obvious little things because everything is
restricted? meaning "Domain User" rights with restricted quota and
roaming profile size etc.
There is a risk that company who is offering those IT-services is
kicked out or maybe just _you_.
In my experience, usability comes first and after that security and
else. It's not the best thing concidering the situation where viruses
are spreading vastly and criminals are lurking holes where to get in to
your network.
It's easier and faster to left domain profiles to workstations and take
scheduled full image backups from time to time and differential ones
more often.
There is plenty of 3rd party software that can do it.
Mails are of course stored in mail server and backed up there.
About profile size: i was working in one customer and there was outlook
pst's and ost's in users profiles.. others were over 2Gt. Then there was
manually made back ups from Outlook and old profiles etc. and everything
saved to current profile under my documents etc.
So there was really huge profiles with many GB's per user. Why those
things happen?
Because users does not know if they need something or not and IT-people
are too busy to sort out customers files and if they need that old back
up of another back up of that 7 year old PC profile..
It's because companys try to save with IT costs and change their
service providers too often and they hire too few people to do their
jobs correctly.
Its just impossibile to do everything by the book in some environments
and that is serious security threat.
Like OS patch management. MS recommends that there is test lab for
testing updates and that lab should contain at least one computer of
each type that is in use at network!
Who has that test lab? I have not seen one.
Then admins should read all KB articles about every updates and after
that concider which updates have to be accepted in WSUS (or 3rd party
replacement).
Who has read all those artiles? I tried but gave up because there was
no time.
Then there should be pilot group where those updates are tested in
product network, which contains volunteers and once again containing
every type of computers that there is in use.
Who have done it? I have not seen or heard..
And thats only one example. There is huge amount of best practises that
just take too much time and effort AND increase work load in future,
like recommended security practises.
And roaming profiles are one of those last things to do where ever i
am. It eats too much network bandwidht and takes too much time when it
WORKS. And if there is a problem it is even worse.
--
a33e
Posted via
http://www.vistaheads.com