Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Server > Server Setup > Bill, your tone is unacceptable and uncalled for

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Bill, your tone is unacceptable and uncalled for

 
 
Spazmo Spaz
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-21-2010

Bill, I'm not sure why you're taking such a defensive and hostile tone in this forum. The question is being posted to help resolve and issue, not to place blame. There's no reason for you to behave this way when speaking with other adults (assuming you are one).

I'm not trying to attack or demean you, I just want you to be aware that your reaction to this question was innapropriate.



Bill Kearney wrote:

Re: Windows 2008 - No Widescreen Support
31-Oct-08

"James Buist" <> wrote in message
news:7C7BD88B-C893-4203-82F3-...

So get on viewsonic to fix the situation.

That and depending on the video card being used there should be an option to
allow using more resolutions. Some cards have more support for this than
others. You can usually make use of a more recent model number monitor that
has the same features. Dell's 2405FPW isn't "supported" in Vista. But
using the most recent model number for the equivalent monitor works fine.
The "driver" for a monitor isn't really an actual driver in most cases.
It's a set of configuration parameters in an .inf file.

Really though, lay the blame where it belongs. On YOU for not checking
hardware compatibility before upgrading.

Previous Posts In This Thread:

On Friday, October 31, 2008 9:06 AM
JamesBuis wrote:

Windows 2008 - No Widescreen Support
We have only widescreen monitors now and I'm installing 2008. I'm amazed that
it doesn't seem to have generic support for widescreens and only goes up to
1280x1024. Also, there seems to be no provsion to prevent the screen from
stretching the none widescreen image thus distorting it.
We have viewsonics and their drivers do not run on 2008 so I'm now stuck
with this horrible to read image on the screen.
Does anyone know of a way around this?
Many thanks

On Friday, October 31, 2008 9:53 AM
Bill Kearney wrote:

Re: Windows 2008 - No Widescreen Support
"James Buist" <> wrote in message
news:7C7BD88B-C893-4203-82F3-...

So get on viewsonic to fix the situation.

That and depending on the video card being used there should be an option to
allow using more resolutions. Some cards have more support for this than
others. You can usually make use of a more recent model number monitor that
has the same features. Dell's 2405FPW isn't "supported" in Vista. But
using the most recent model number for the equivalent monitor works fine.
The "driver" for a monitor isn't really an actual driver in most cases.
It's a set of configuration parameters in an .inf file.

Really though, lay the blame where it belongs. On YOU for not checking
hardware compatibility before upgrading.

On Friday, October 31, 2008 3:16 PM
randy.buchholz wrote:

One reason you won't find much support (from MS or Vendors) for things like
One reason you won't find much support (from MS or Vendors) for things like
graphics and sound is that a presumption is that most users will use the
server OS on machines that are used as servers; where good graphics and
sound are rarely used. I'm running 2008 as my desktop OS as after trying
all the OS versons. 2008 is (too me) noticably crisper. While some drivers
are available for 2008 (very few though) often you can get a vista driver to
work. I wouldn't expect to see much support directly for '08 in many areas.
In fact, in areas where you expect to see strong support it is often
lacking. For example, I can't 2008 on a RAID 10 array with the new AMD
Chipset on a new ASUS board because 2008 will only let you use certified
drivers and there are none (That I can find after weeks of searching and
trying anything remotly close). I'm dual booting now so I can get
performance when I need it and play games when I want to.

Good luck on your search.


"James Buist" <> wrote in message
news:7C7BD88B-C893-4203-82F3-...

On Saturday, November 01, 2008 8:05 AM
Meinolf Weber wrote:

Hello James,Basically this is the vendors job.
Hello James,

Basically this is the vendors job. He has to provide drivers for all his
functionality. With MS you get a bunch of drivers so you can work.

Best regards

Meinolf Weber
Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers
no rights.
** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm

On Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:50 PM
Spazmo Spaz wrote:

Bill, your tone is appalling and uncalled for
Bill, I'm not sure why you're taking such a defensive and hostile tone in this forum. The question is being posted to help resolve and issue, not to place blame. There's no reason for you to behave this way when speaking with other adults (assuming you are one).

I'm not trying to attack or demean you, I just want you to be aware that your reaction to this question was innapropriate.

On Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:52 PM
Spazmo Spaz wrote:

Bill, your tone is unnacceptable and uncalled for
Bill, I'm not sure why you're taking such a defensive and hostile tone in this forum. The question is being posted to help resolve and issue, not to place blame. There's no reason for you to behave this way when speaking with other adults (assuming you are one).

I'm not trying to attack or demean you, I just want you to be aware that your reaction to this question was innapropriate.


Submitted via EggHeadCafe - Software Developer Portal of Choice
WPF Customized Find Control for FlowDocuments
http://www.eggheadcafe.com/tutorials...ind-contr.aspx
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Phillip Windell
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      04-22-2010

Why did yo post this 4 times?


--
Phillip Windell

The views expressed, are my own and not those of my employer, or Microsoft,
or anyone else associated with me, including my cats.
-----------------------------------------------------


<Spazmo Spaz> wrote in message
news:...
> Bill, I'm not sure why you're taking such a defensive and hostile tone in
> this forum. The question is being posted to help resolve and issue, not to
> place blame. There's no reason for you to behave this way when speaking
> with other adults (assuming you are one).
>
> I'm not trying to attack or demean you, I just want you to be aware that
> your reaction to this question was innapropriate.
>
>
>
> Bill Kearney wrote:
>
> Re: Windows 2008 - No Widescreen Support
> 31-Oct-08
>
> "James Buist" <> wrote in message
> news:7C7BD88B-C893-4203-82F3-...
>
> So get on viewsonic to fix the situation.
>
> That and depending on the video card being used there should be an option
> to
> allow using more resolutions. Some cards have more support for this than
> others. You can usually make use of a more recent model number monitor
> that
> has the same features. Dell's 2405FPW isn't "supported" in Vista. But
> using the most recent model number for the equivalent monitor works fine.
> The "driver" for a monitor isn't really an actual driver in most cases.
> It's a set of configuration parameters in an .inf file.
>
> Really though, lay the blame where it belongs. On YOU for not checking
> hardware compatibility before upgrading.
>
> Previous Posts In This Thread:
>
> On Friday, October 31, 2008 9:06 AM
> JamesBuis wrote:
>
> Windows 2008 - No Widescreen Support
> We have only widescreen monitors now and I'm installing 2008. I'm amazed
> that
> it doesn't seem to have generic support for widescreens and only goes up
> to
> 1280x1024. Also, there seems to be no provsion to prevent the screen from
> stretching the none widescreen image thus distorting it.
> We have viewsonics and their drivers do not run on 2008 so I'm now stuck
> with this horrible to read image on the screen.
> Does anyone know of a way around this?
> Many thanks
>
> On Friday, October 31, 2008 9:53 AM
> Bill Kearney wrote:
>
> Re: Windows 2008 - No Widescreen Support
> "James Buist" <> wrote in message
> news:7C7BD88B-C893-4203-82F3-...
>
> So get on viewsonic to fix the situation.
>
> That and depending on the video card being used there should be an option
> to
> allow using more resolutions. Some cards have more support for this than
> others. You can usually make use of a more recent model number monitor
> that
> has the same features. Dell's 2405FPW isn't "supported" in Vista. But
> using the most recent model number for the equivalent monitor works fine.
> The "driver" for a monitor isn't really an actual driver in most cases.
> It's a set of configuration parameters in an .inf file.
>
> Really though, lay the blame where it belongs. On YOU for not checking
> hardware compatibility before upgrading.
>
> On Friday, October 31, 2008 3:16 PM
> randy.buchholz wrote:
>
> One reason you won't find much support (from MS or Vendors) for things
> like
> One reason you won't find much support (from MS or Vendors) for things
> like
> graphics and sound is that a presumption is that most users will use the
> server OS on machines that are used as servers; where good graphics and
> sound are rarely used. I'm running 2008 as my desktop OS as after trying
> all the OS versons. 2008 is (too me) noticably crisper. While some
> drivers
> are available for 2008 (very few though) often you can get a vista driver
> to
> work. I wouldn't expect to see much support directly for '08 in many
> areas.
> In fact, in areas where you expect to see strong support it is often
> lacking. For example, I can't 2008 on a RAID 10 array with the new AMD
> Chipset on a new ASUS board because 2008 will only let you use certified
> drivers and there are none (That I can find after weeks of searching and
> trying anything remotly close). I'm dual booting now so I can get
> performance when I need it and play games when I want to.
>
> Good luck on your search.
>
>
> "James Buist" <> wrote in message
> news:7C7BD88B-C893-4203-82F3-...
>
> On Saturday, November 01, 2008 8:05 AM
> Meinolf Weber wrote:
>
> Hello James,Basically this is the vendors job.
> Hello James,
>
> Basically this is the vendors job. He has to provide drivers for all his
> functionality. With MS you get a bunch of drivers so you can work.
>
> Best regards
>
> Meinolf Weber
> Disclaimer: This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and
> confers
> no rights.
> ** Please do NOT email, only reply to Newsgroups
> ** HELP us help YOU!!! http://www.blakjak.demon.co.uk/mul_crss.htm
>
> On Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:50 PM
> Spazmo Spaz wrote:
>
> Bill, your tone is appalling and uncalled for
> Bill, I'm not sure why you're taking such a defensive and hostile tone in
> this forum. The question is being posted to help resolve and issue, not to
> place blame. There's no reason for you to behave this way when speaking
> with other adults (assuming you are one).
>
> I'm not trying to attack or demean you, I just want you to be aware that
> your reaction to this question was innapropriate.
>
> On Wednesday, April 21, 2010 2:52 PM
> Spazmo Spaz wrote:
>
> Bill, your tone is unnacceptable and uncalled for
> Bill, I'm not sure why you're taking such a defensive and hostile tone in
> this forum. The question is being posted to help resolve and issue, not to
> place blame. There's no reason for you to behave this way when speaking
> with other adults (assuming you are one).
>
> I'm not trying to attack or demean you, I just want you to be aware that
> your reaction to this question was innapropriate.
>
>
> Submitted via EggHeadCafe - Software Developer Portal of Choice
> WPF Customized Find Control for FlowDocuments
> http://www.eggheadcafe.com/tutorials...ind-contr.aspx



 
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bill, your tone is unnacceptable and uncalled for Spazmo Spaz Server Setup 0 04-21-2010 06:53 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59