A blow to the Propaganda of Vista worshipers....

As I have said.. Vista is not more secure than XP, in fact its worse.. far
worse..

I wont go into the hundreds of reasons why the above statement is true.. but
I will

give you this:

"Recently, there has been talk of Microsoft scraping the traditional Windows
registry in favor of an alternative, in the evolution from Windows Vista SP1
and Windows XP SP3 to Windows 7. Such a scenario is simply ridiculous. Could
Microsoft do it? In a heart bit. Will Microsoft do it? No. Why? Well the
answer is simple. And at the same time it is connected with the reason why
the Redmond company has not introduced a SINGLE security boundary in Windows
Vista, despite the fact that it served the latest Windows client five years
after XP. "

AND I REPEAT:::>>>>>

has not introduced a SINGLE security boundary in Windows Vista, despite the
fact that it served the latest Windows client five years after XP

AND I REPEAT YET AGAIN>>>>>

has not introduced a SINGLE security boundary in Windows Vista, despite the
fact that it served the latest Windows client five years after XP


read the full article here:
http://news.softpedia.com/news/No-Mo...-7-76470.shtml

As time goes by, the monstrosity called VISTA will be unraveled and the
truth will shine. Already more and more people think vista is sh!t.
Next step is them to really understand WHY.

In article <478faaf0$>,
John Smith <> wrote:
>As I have said.. Vista is not more secure than XP, in fact its worse.. far
>I wont go into the hundreds of reasons why the above statement is true.. but

Please do.

John Smith wrote:
> As I have said..
>
>
> read the full article here:
> http//news.softpedia.com/news/No-More-Registry-from-Vista-SP1-and-XP-SP3-to-Windows-7-76470shtml
>
>

You haven't said anything dingbat.
You are regurgitating.
Aww...and in your brand new Bozo Bin