| Home | Register | Members | Search | Windows Vista Tips | File Database | Links |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
Massaro. Antonio M
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"Mikoyan" <> wrote in message
news:... > Can anyone tell me what bootsect.bak does? Sounds like a boot sector back up file. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Massaro. Antonio M
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
"R. C. White" <> wrote in message
news:... > Hi, Mikoyan. > > The exact function of this file has changed with successive generations of > Windows, so this answer may not be correct for all versions. (Also, I am > not a techie, so, even if my explanation is correct, there probably are > others who can explain it better than I can.) > > When the computer is first powered on, it knows nothing. But there is an > EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) chip on the > motherboard that holds the Basic Input/Output System (BIOS). These are > the most basic, most primitive instructions that make the system start to > "pull itself up by its bootstraps" - that is, to "boot" itself by starting > from zero. These first instructions can't do much but tell the hardware > to find the first internal hard disk drive, transfer the contents of the > first physical sector on that disk into memory, and then start executing > the instructions found there. This first sector on each HDD is the MBR - > the Master Boot Record. A sector is only 512 bytes long; there is just > enough room to hold the 64-byte Partition Table plus about 400 bytes of > still-primitive instructions. The Partition Table has room for four > 16-byte entries; each of these tells where one partition starts and ends, > plus a few bits of information about that partition, including whether it > is the one Active (bootable) partition on that HDD. The MBR code finds > the start of that Active partition and loads the first physical sector of > that partition into RAM and starts executing those instructions. This > first physical sector of the Active partition is the "boot sector". This > partition is the "System Volume" for this boot session; it is often > referred to as the "System Partition" since it must be a primary > partition, not a logical drive in an extended partition. > > The contents of the boot sector vary, depending on which operating system > wrote it onto the hard drive. The Win9x boot sector had instructions to > look for the files IO.SYS and MS-DOS.SYS. Win2K/XP boot sectors are based > on Windows NT, so they look for NTLDR, the NT loader. Vista and Windows 7 > boot sectors look for bootmgr, the boot manager. > > No matter which code is in the boot sector, it must find a file with no > extension in the Root of that Active partition. At this very early boot > stage, the computer doesn't yet know how to deal with extensions or > folders or multiple partitions, much less multiple hard drives. So those > first startup files must be in the Root of that partition and the correct > boot sector code must be on the first physical sector. This sector is > OUTSIDE the file system, so it can't be copied or backed up or otherwise > handled by normal Windows programs or utilities. Only special > system-level utilities, such as Windows Setup, can deal with the boot > sector. > > When we install WinXP, Setup writes the XP-style boot sector code, which > will look for NTLDR - which will then find the files NTDETECT.COM and > Boot.ini, also in the root of the System Partition, and use those to find > the file ntoskrnl.exe in the Boot Folder (typically C:\Windows - but not > necessarily) to load WinXP. > > But Vista and Win7 write different code into the boot sector. This looks > for the file "bootmgr" - no extension - in the Root of the System > Partition. Bootmgr reads the files in the hidden \Boot folder on that > partition; this folder holds the Boot Configuration Data (BCD) which > Vista/Win7 uses to find the file winload.exe in the Boot Folder (also > often - but not always - C:\Windows, the same filename as for WinXP) and > use that to boot Vista or Win7. > > When Vista/Win7 Setup discovers an existing WinXP boot sector in the > System Partition, it saves a copy of that sector in a new file in the Root > of the System Partition; this file is typically C:\bootsect.dos. This is > a part of the process of updating the BCD to provide for a multi-boot > system, which will present an operating system menu at each subsequent > reboot. > > Later, at each boot, if the user selects to boot Vista/Win7, bootsect.dos > will be ignored, along with NTLDR, etc. But if the user chooses to boot > an "Earlier version of Windows", then bootmgr will step back out of the > way and load the WinXP-style boot code from bootsect.dos, which will find > NTLDR, etc., and load WinXP. After this initial selection, the computer > will see only WinXP code or only Vista/Win7 code; neither will interfere > with the other. > > > After all that, I still haven't mentioned bootsect.bak. I have both the > .dos and .bak versions of bootsect in my System Partition. Each is > exactly 512 bytes, one sector, with no apparent differences. I'm not sure > how .bak came to be created, but it is dated later than the .dos file. > > Now, let's hope a true techie will fill in the missing links. ;<) > > RC > -- > R. C. White, CPA > San Marcos, TX > > Microsoft Windows MVP > Windows Live Mail 2009 (14.0.8089.0726) in Win7 Ultimate x64 > > "Mikoyan" <> wrote in message > news:... >> Can anyone tell me what bootsect.bak does? > R. C., Sounds like something I used to remember back in the old Windows 95/98 days. How I came up with the simple back up wording was because, for kicks and fun, I am always looking through the files and directories via the DOS shell. At one point I was installing a program (so long time ago), it created a back up of the main file names like autoexec.bat with this file autoexec.bak, preserving the settings while it overwrites the main file in use with the new settings. This way, should something happens, it can be reverted back to the old settings via the bak extension. It's been a long line since that time and this time as I do not install much programs on my Vista machine that requires such. I can only speculate until a real techie gets wind of this that any thing with a bak extension is strictly backed up while the original file is overwritten. Now a days, you got programs and OS's with that nifty roll-back feature that it can automatically roll-back anything should it goes wrong. Since this file in question is "bootsect" I am thinking it has something to do with backing up partition data. But as I say, I am just only speculating until a techie comes along and deciphers this. Thanks R.C. for bringing back something to my memory about backups a detail further. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mikoyan
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Thank you for your time in answering this.
Any further ideas would be really appreciated Regards, Mikoyan "Massaro. Antonio M" <> wrote in message news 9B87086-18D3-4EEC-AF48-...> "R. C. White" <> wrote in message > news:... >> Hi, Mikoyan. >> >> The exact function of this file has changed with successive generations >> of Windows, so this answer may not be correct for all versions. (Also, I >> am not a techie, so, even if my explanation is correct, there probably >> are others who can explain it better than I can.) >> >> When the computer is first powered on, it knows nothing. But there is an >> EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) chip on the >> motherboard that holds the Basic Input/Output System (BIOS). These are >> the most basic, most primitive instructions that make the system start to >> "pull itself up by its bootstraps" - that is, to "boot" itself by >> starting from zero. These first instructions can't do much but tell the >> hardware to find the first internal hard disk drive, transfer the >> contents of the first physical sector on that disk into memory, and then >> start executing the instructions found there. This first sector on each >> HDD is the MBR - the Master Boot Record. A sector is only 512 bytes >> long; there is just enough room to hold the 64-byte Partition Table plus >> about 400 bytes of still-primitive instructions. The Partition Table has >> room for four 16-byte entries; each of these tells where one partition >> starts and ends, plus a few bits of information about that partition, >> including whether it is the one Active (bootable) partition on that HDD. >> The MBR code finds the start of that Active partition and loads the first >> physical sector of that partition into RAM and starts executing those >> instructions. This first physical sector of the Active partition is the >> "boot sector". This partition is the "System Volume" for this boot >> session; it is often referred to as the "System Partition" since it must >> be a primary partition, not a logical drive in an extended partition. >> >> The contents of the boot sector vary, depending on which operating system >> wrote it onto the hard drive. The Win9x boot sector had instructions to >> look for the files IO.SYS and MS-DOS.SYS. Win2K/XP boot sectors are >> based on Windows NT, so they look for NTLDR, the NT loader. Vista and >> Windows 7 boot sectors look for bootmgr, the boot manager. >> >> No matter which code is in the boot sector, it must find a file with no >> extension in the Root of that Active partition. At this very early boot >> stage, the computer doesn't yet know how to deal with extensions or >> folders or multiple partitions, much less multiple hard drives. So those >> first startup files must be in the Root of that partition and the correct >> boot sector code must be on the first physical sector. This sector is >> OUTSIDE the file system, so it can't be copied or backed up or otherwise >> handled by normal Windows programs or utilities. Only special >> system-level utilities, such as Windows Setup, can deal with the boot >> sector. >> >> When we install WinXP, Setup writes the XP-style boot sector code, which >> will look for NTLDR - which will then find the files NTDETECT.COM and >> Boot.ini, also in the root of the System Partition, and use those to find >> the file ntoskrnl.exe in the Boot Folder (typically C:\Windows - but not >> necessarily) to load WinXP. >> >> But Vista and Win7 write different code into the boot sector. This looks >> for the file "bootmgr" - no extension - in the Root of the System >> Partition. Bootmgr reads the files in the hidden \Boot folder on that >> partition; this folder holds the Boot Configuration Data (BCD) which >> Vista/Win7 uses to find the file winload.exe in the Boot Folder (also >> often - but not always - C:\Windows, the same filename as for WinXP) and >> use that to boot Vista or Win7. >> >> When Vista/Win7 Setup discovers an existing WinXP boot sector in the >> System Partition, it saves a copy of that sector in a new file in the >> Root of the System Partition; this file is typically C:\bootsect.dos. >> This is a part of the process of updating the BCD to provide for a >> multi-boot system, which will present an operating system menu at each >> subsequent reboot. >> >> Later, at each boot, if the user selects to boot Vista/Win7, bootsect.dos >> will be ignored, along with NTLDR, etc. But if the user chooses to boot >> an "Earlier version of Windows", then bootmgr will step back out of the >> way and load the WinXP-style boot code from bootsect.dos, which will find >> NTLDR, etc., and load WinXP. After this initial selection, the computer >> will see only WinXP code or only Vista/Win7 code; neither will interfere >> with the other. >> >> >> After all that, I still haven't mentioned bootsect.bak. I have both the >> .dos and .bak versions of bootsect in my System Partition. Each is >> exactly 512 bytes, one sector, with no apparent differences. I'm not >> sure how .bak came to be created, but it is dated later than the .dos >> file. >> >> Now, let's hope a true techie will fill in the missing links. ;<) >> >> RC >> -- >> R. C. White, CPA >> San Marcos, TX >> >> Microsoft Windows MVP >> Windows Live Mail 2009 (14.0.8089.0726) in Win7 Ultimate x64 >> >> "Mikoyan" <> wrote in message >> news:... >>> Can anyone tell me what bootsect.bak does? >> > > > > R. C., > > Sounds like something I used to remember back in the old Windows 95/98 > days. How I came up with the simple back up wording was because, for kicks > and fun, I am always looking through the files and directories via the DOS > shell. At one point I was installing a program (so long time ago), it > created a back up of the main file names like autoexec.bat with this file > autoexec.bak, preserving the settings while it overwrites the main file in > use with the new settings. This way, should something happens, it can be > reverted back to the old settings via the bak extension. > > It's been a long line since that time and this time as I do not install > much programs on my Vista machine that requires such. I can only speculate > until a real techie gets wind of this that any thing with a bak extension > is strictly backed up while the original file is overwritten. Now a days, > you got programs and OS's with that nifty roll-back feature that it can > automatically roll-back anything should it goes wrong. > > Since this file in question is "bootsect" I am thinking it has something > to do with backing up partition data. But as I say, I am just only > speculating until a techie comes along and deciphers this. > > Thanks R.C. for bringing back something to my memory about backups a > detail further. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gene E. Bloch
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
..bak is the standard extension - and has been since DOS days (and before) - for a backup file, which is the original file with only its extension changed. This is done prior to saving the modified copy of the original. There is no doubt of the above... On Wed, 25 Nov 2009 12:30:15 -0000, Mikoyan wrote: > Thank you for your time in answering this. > > Any further ideas would be really appreciated > > Regards, Mikoyan > > > "Massaro. Antonio M" <> wrote in message > news 9B87086-18D3-4EEC-AF48-...>> "R. C. White" <> wrote in message >> news:... >>> Hi, Mikoyan. >>> >>> The exact function of this file has changed with successive generations >>> of Windows, so this answer may not be correct for all versions. (Also, I >>> am not a techie, so, even if my explanation is correct, there probably >>> are others who can explain it better than I can.) >>> >>> When the computer is first powered on, it knows nothing. But there is an >>> EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory) chip on the >>> motherboard that holds the Basic Input/Output System (BIOS). These are >>> the most basic, most primitive instructions that make the system start to >>> "pull itself up by its bootstraps" - that is, to "boot" itself by >>> starting from zero. These first instructions can't do much but tell the >>> hardware to find the first internal hard disk drive, transfer the >>> contents of the first physical sector on that disk into memory, and then >>> start executing the instructions found there. This first sector on each >>> HDD is the MBR - the Master Boot Record. A sector is only 512 bytes >>> long; there is just enough room to hold the 64-byte Partition Table plus >>> about 400 bytes of still-primitive instructions. The Partition Table has >>> room for four 16-byte entries; each of these tells where one partition >>> starts and ends, plus a few bits of information about that partition, >>> including whether it is the one Active (bootable) partition on that HDD. >>> The MBR code finds the start of that Active partition and loads the first >>> physical sector of that partition into RAM and starts executing those >>> instructions. This first physical sector of the Active partition is the >>> "boot sector". This partition is the "System Volume" for this boot >>> session; it is often referred to as the "System Partition" since it must >>> be a primary partition, not a logical drive in an extended partition. >>> >>> The contents of the boot sector vary, depending on which operating system >>> wrote it onto the hard drive. The Win9x boot sector had instructions to >>> look for the files IO.SYS and MS-DOS.SYS. Win2K/XP boot sectors are >>> based on Windows NT, so they look for NTLDR, the NT loader. Vista and >>> Windows 7 boot sectors look for bootmgr, the boot manager. >>> >>> No matter which code is in the boot sector, it must find a file with no >>> extension in the Root of that Active partition. At this very early boot >>> stage, the computer doesn't yet know how to deal with extensions or >>> folders or multiple partitions, much less multiple hard drives. So those >>> first startup files must be in the Root of that partition and the correct >>> boot sector code must be on the first physical sector. This sector is >>> OUTSIDE the file system, so it can't be copied or backed up or otherwise >>> handled by normal Windows programs or utilities. Only special >>> system-level utilities, such as Windows Setup, can deal with the boot >>> sector. >>> >>> When we install WinXP, Setup writes the XP-style boot sector code, which >>> will look for NTLDR - which will then find the files NTDETECT.COM and >>> Boot.ini, also in the root of the System Partition, and use those to find >>> the file ntoskrnl.exe in the Boot Folder (typically C:\Windows - but not >>> necessarily) to load WinXP. >>> >>> But Vista and Win7 write different code into the boot sector. This looks >>> for the file "bootmgr" - no extension - in the Root of the System >>> Partition. Bootmgr reads the files in the hidden \Boot folder on that >>> partition; this folder holds the Boot Configuration Data (BCD) which >>> Vista/Win7 uses to find the file winload.exe in the Boot Folder (also >>> often - but not always - C:\Windows, the same filename as for WinXP) and >>> use that to boot Vista or Win7. >>> >>> When Vista/Win7 Setup discovers an existing WinXP boot sector in the >>> System Partition, it saves a copy of that sector in a new file in the >>> Root of the System Partition; this file is typically C:\bootsect.dos. >>> This is a part of the process of updating the BCD to provide for a >>> multi-boot system, which will present an operating system menu at each >>> subsequent reboot. >>> >>> Later, at each boot, if the user selects to boot Vista/Win7, bootsect.dos >>> will be ignored, along with NTLDR, etc. But if the user chooses to boot >>> an "Earlier version of Windows", then bootmgr will step back out of the >>> way and load the WinXP-style boot code from bootsect.dos, which will find >>> NTLDR, etc., and load WinXP. After this initial selection, the computer >>> will see only WinXP code or only Vista/Win7 code; neither will interfere >>> with the other. >>> >>> >>> After all that, I still haven't mentioned bootsect.bak. I have both the >>> .dos and .bak versions of bootsect in my System Partition. Each is >>> exactly 512 bytes, one sector, with no apparent differences. I'm not >>> sure how .bak came to be created, but it is dated later than the .dos >>> file. >>> >>> Now, let's hope a true techie will fill in the missing links. ;<) >>> >>> RC >>> -- >>> R. C. White, CPA >>> San Marcos, TX >>> >>> Microsoft Windows MVP >>> Windows Live Mail 2009 (14.0.8089.0726) in Win7 Ultimate x64 >>> >>> "Mikoyan" <> wrote in message >>> news:... >>>> Can anyone tell me what bootsect.bak does? >>> >> >> >> >> R. C., >> >> Sounds like something I used to remember back in the old Windows 95/98 >> days. How I came up with the simple back up wording was because, for kicks >> and fun, I am always looking through the files and directories via the DOS >> shell. At one point I was installing a program (so long time ago), it >> created a back up of the main file names like autoexec.bat with this file >> autoexec.bak, preserving the settings while it overwrites the main file in >> use with the new settings. This way, should something happens, it can be >> reverted back to the old settings via the bak extension. >> >> It's been a long line since that time and this time as I do not install >> much programs on my Vista machine that requires such. I can only speculate >> until a real techie gets wind of this that any thing with a bak extension >> is strictly backed up while the original file is overwritten. Now a days, >> you got programs and OS's with that nifty roll-back feature that it can >> automatically roll-back anything should it goes wrong. >> >> Since this file in question is "bootsect" I am thinking it has something >> to do with backing up partition data. But as I say, I am just only >> speculating until a techie comes along and deciphers this. >> >> Thanks R.C. for bringing back something to my memory about backups a >> detail further. -- Gene E. Bloch letters0x40blochg0x2Ecom |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Advice on Windows Boot Manager | Ger68 | Windows Vista Installation | 22 | 06-06-2008 10:34 AM |
| BOOTSECT.BAK | xeriouxi | Windows Vista Installation | 3 | 07-11-2007 06:16 PM |
Forum Software Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc. |



Linear Mode

