Bug fixes in 5728?

Where is the list of known bugs that were in build 5600 that are fixed in
5728?

I don't know that the list of bugs fixed between builds is every made
publicly available.

--
Best of Luck,

Rick Rogers, aka "Nutcase" - Microsoft MVP
http://mvp.support.microsoft.com/
Windows help - www.rickrogers.org

"Roof Fiddler" <> wrote in message
news:%23OZ%...
> Where is the list of known bugs that were in build 5600 that are fixed in
> 5728?
>

Rick Rogers wrote:
> I don't know that the list of bugs fixed between builds is every made
> publicly available.
>

Yeah, it would be nice to know of the bug fixes. Hopefully, this data
will be released soon since everyone is doing Microsoft a service by
testing Windows Vista for them. Microsoft on its part has finally
lightened up and seen the light that it is critical for them to seek
user input. Now if only Microsoft sees the light about a true successor
for 98SE that will be a Classic edition for older computers that cannot
even run Windows XP let alone a basic Vista install. Windows 98 is in
third place after XP and 2000 according to this informative article.

http://news.softpedia.com/news/Micro...et-33363.shtml

The 9X line is long time dead and no work will be done on it. End of story.

"Dan" wrote:

> Rick Rogers wrote:
> > I don't know that the list of bugs fixed between builds is every made
> > publicly available.
> >
>
> Yeah, it would be nice to know of the bug fixes. Hopefully, this data
> will be released soon since everyone is doing Microsoft a service by
> testing Windows Vista for them. Microsoft on its part has finally
> lightened up and seen the light that it is critical for them to seek
> user input. Now if only Microsoft sees the light about a true successor
> for 98SE that will be a Classic edition for older computers that cannot
> even run Windows XP let alone a basic Vista install. Windows 98 is in
> third place after XP and 2000 according to this informative article.
>
> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Micro...et-33363.shtml
>

Win 98 is also no longer a supported OS. It is gone as of July 11, along
with Win ME. No more patches, updates, or fixes to it or any of the bundled
software like WMP or IE for 98. If you are still using 98, disconnect the
machine from the internet entirely.

"Dan" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> Rick Rogers wrote:
>> I don't know that the list of bugs fixed between builds is every made
>> publicly available.
>>
>
> Yeah, it would be nice to know of the bug fixes. Hopefully, this data
> will be released soon since everyone is doing Microsoft a service by
> testing Windows Vista for them. Microsoft on its part has finally
> lightened up and seen the light that it is critical for them to seek user
> input. Now if only Microsoft sees the light about a true successor for
> 98SE that will be a Classic edition for older computers that cannot even
> run Windows XP let alone a basic Vista install. Windows 98 is in third
> place after XP and 2000 according to this informative article.
>
> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Micro...et-33363.shtml

Colin Barnhorst wrote:
> Win 98 is also no longer a supported OS. It is gone as of July 11, along
> with Win ME. No more patches, updates, or fixes to it or any of the bundled
> software like WMP or IE for 98. If you are still using 98, disconnect the
> machine from the internet entirely.
>
> "Dan" <> wrote in message
> news:%...
>> Rick Rogers wrote:
>>> I don't know that the list of bugs fixed between builds is every made
>>> publicly available.
>>>
>> Yeah, it would be nice to know of the bug fixes. Hopefully, this data
>> will be released soon since everyone is doing Microsoft a service by
>> testing Windows Vista for them. Microsoft on its part has finally
>> lightened up and seen the light that it is critical for them to seek user
>> input. Now if only Microsoft sees the light about a true successor for
>> 98SE that will be a Classic edition for older computers that cannot even
>> run Windows XP let alone a basic Vista install. Windows 98 is in third
>> place after XP and 2000 according to this informative article.
>>
>> http://news.softpedia.com/news/Micro...et-33363.shtml
>
>
Nope, 98SE stays on the Internet. I have a NAT router as well as Zone
Alarm Professional firewall. Also, check out how insecure XP really is
after all.

http://secunia.com/product/22/

Vendor Microsoft

Product Link N/A

Affected By 153 Secunia advisories

Unpatched 19% (29 of 153 Secunia advisories)

Most Critical Unpatched
The most severe unpatched Secunia advisory affecting Microsoft Windows
XP Professional, with all vendor patches applied, is rated Extremely
critical

http://secunia.com/product/13/

Vendor Microsoft

Product Link N/A

Affected By 32 Secunia advisories

Unpatched 9% (3 of 32 Secunia advisories)

Most Critical Unpatched
The most severe unpatched Secunia advisory affecting Microsoft Windows
98 Second Edition, with all vendor patches applied, is rated Less critical

http://secunia.com/product/1/

Vendor Microsoft

Product Link View Here (Link to external site)

Affected By 131 Secunia advisories

Unpatched 15% (20 of 131 Secunia advisories)

Most Critical Unpatched
The most severe unpatched Secunia advisory affecting Microsoft Windows
2000 Professional, with all vendor patches applied, is rated Extremely
critical

http://secunia.com/product/16/
Vendor Microsoft

Product Link N/A

Affected By 138 Secunia advisories

Unpatched 19% (26 of 138 Secunia advisories)

Most Critical Unpatched
The most severe unpatched Secunia advisory affecting Microsoft Windows
XP Home Edition, with all vendor patches applied, is rated Extremely
critical


**************And The Truth Will Set You Free***********************