Tony, San Marcos CA wrote:
> It is unconscionable that you
This is Usenet, not Microsoft. Duh!
> and your organization
This is Usenet, not Microsoft. Duh!
> would incorporate IE8 within your Windows 7
This is Usenet, not Microsoft. Duh!
> Upgrade knowing how unstable the interface appears to be. How many
> times can one launch a frozen application, or reboot, or reload
> software, etc.? Vista and IE7 were fine, now I have crap! I wasted 7
> good hours of my week-end just trying to debug your browser
This is Usenet, not Microsoft. Duh!
> to no avail. You folks
This is Usenet, not Microsoft. Duh!
> must be deaf or just too stupid to realize the impact you
This is Usenet, not Microsoft. Duh!
> have on your user base
This is Usenet, not Microsoft. Duh!
> when we have to struggle to make your applications
This is Usenet, not Microsoft. Duh!
> perform. The threads I am reading indicate these issues for quite
> awhile¡K and then you
This is Usenet, not Microsoft. Duh!
> have the gall to release this to the public! As a development manager,
Obviously a lie since the boob hasn't a clue to where he is posting.
> I know what it takes to develop excellent software
Oh yes, we fully understand the "quality" of your software based on
your peurile post here.
> and I understand the value of delivering a great product to the market
> place. The best thing I can do tomorrow is to buy more shares of
> Apple.
iPod saved Apple's financial butt. What are you hoping will save them
next time?
> You and your team
This is Usenet, not Microsoft. Duh!
> are stimulating your competitions economy. I suppose they should thank
> you!
This is Usenet, not Microsoft. Duh!
> Tony, San Marcos CA
From a boob that hasn't a clue that he is WHINING in Usenet
(newsgroups) and that he is posting through a webnews-for-dummies
gateway to Usenet.
|