Hey John,
1 -> We thought about doing this as well. In the end, it was cut (time
constraint).
2 -> That's a great suggestion, and I will be sure to pass that one along
internally.
3 -> Yes, that has come up as well, and it's a great idea. May be added in
the future!
4 -> Good point. The necessity to use NTFS resides in the fact that we rely
on the USN Journal to listen for file changes. Adding support for FAT32
would require a lot of architectural redesigns. Good idea nonetheless, and
we have received a lot of feedback for our lack of FAT32 support.
5 -> Yep! We have received tons of feedback on that issue as well.
Thanks for your great suggestions!
ines
--
Ines K.
Windows Live Messenger
*************************************************
http://inesvt.spaces.msn.com/
http://messengersays.spaces.msn.com/
"John Jay Smith" <-> wrote in message
news:e78b%...
> If you are in charge if sharing folders..
> I have some suggestions:
>
> 1) progress bar of each file transfer
> 2) Placeholders like Foldershare.com
> 3) The movment of files to a trash folder if other party deletes them (see
> foldershare.com)
> 4) I would ask for you to remove the nessesity for NTFS. This is very
> akward. The file system used should be transparent to such applications. I
> dont know the underlying reasons why you have chosen it, but a multitude
> of P2P applications work on all file systems.
>
> 5) And of course make the user able to put those files where he wants!
>
>
> <> wrote in message
> news:OuY36%...
>> Unfortunately at this time, you cannot pick the Sharing Folder's location
>> (it uses the primary volume of your machine).
>>
>> This feature requested was discussed for a long time, but it ended up
>> being dropped.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> ines
>> WLM - Sharing Folders
>>
>> "John Jay Smith" <-> wrote in message
>> news:%...
>>>I have all my files organized so that data files are on another drive...
>>>
>>> so I want the store folder of the shared files to go in my other drive.
>>>
>>> How do I change this?
>>>
>>
>>
>
>