On Fri, 05 Oct 2007 15:05:57 GMT, Dave Cox <> wrote:
>"Tibery-OS" <> wrote in
>news:47061ffa$:
>
>> Clarify your Vista!
>>
>> I want to make it clear for the vistaboys.
>>
>> Vista is NOT another windows2000 or windows XP,
>> where some people may have complained because they were resistant
>> to change, so the vistaboys say at least.
>> I never complained about any version of windows before, or
>> microsoft product for that matter!
>>
>> Vista is a totally different thing. It is BAD, Horrible and
>> Stupid. And this will not change with time,
>> nor will a service pack fix it, as I have said even before I know
>> how little the service pack would do... lol
>>
>> Again another of my predictions that is correct.. the service pack
>> would not change the acceptance of vista.
>> Vista is BAD BY DESIGN. And the FACT is that service packs CANNOT
>> AND WILL NOT CHANGE DESIGN.
>>
>> Sorry my poor vistaboys... Its only that I am right and you are
>> wrong, whether you like it or not, whether you understand it or
>> not.
>>
>> -Tiberius...
>
>If the design is bad for you........don't use it! use Ubuntu or MAC
>or XP or whatever.
>
>Your opinion is just that.
Conversely, your opinion is the same thing... just another opinion.
Why that simple fact never dawns on fanboys I'll never understand.
What I've noticed about normal people and fanboy zealots is they
always attempt to discredit other people's opinions and prevent them
from expressing them while they try to elevate their opinions which
are often very lopsided and biased often pretending their opinions are
fact, rather than just the opinions they actually are. I hope that
wasn't too deep for Cox, he's rather dense.
>I can respect someone stating their
>opinion and sometimes listening to them does offer some very valuble
>information, it's when they state it over and over again and call
>others stupid or Vistaboys because their opinions differ, then things
>become troublesome, unproductive and childish not to mention loosing
>any validation of their opionion in the first place.
Again, just flip flop what you said. You can easily find hundreds of
posts just in the past month when the Vista fanboy mob has viciously
attacked a whole bunch of posters for merely expressing their opinions
and experiences. Accordingly why should anyone give any credit to any
fanboy's rantings and ravings?
As an example take the poster Frank. This zealot has repeated the same
lie about me hundreds of times, claiming I can't get Vista to work and
that I must have installed it improperly and therefore I'm a idiot all
because I documented my experiences with slow file copying. The truth
is I'm one of the first that offered at least a partial fix, links to
the hotfix Microsoft provided and have helped people over and over
with work-arounds to help address this issue. Meanwhile the same
zealot denies this is a real problem even though Microsoft has owned
up to it yet Frank just goes on his merry way ranting and raving daily
like a crazy person.
So who has more creditability? Some foaming from the mouth zealot
that's a pathological liar or someone that points out issues,
documents them and where possible offers a fix?
The truth is fanboys are called that because they are too passionate
and blinded by their devotion to Microsoft. They come off looking
silly at best to rational people because they constantly pretend
nothing is seriously wrong with Vista in spite of admissions to the
contrary by Microsoft and confirmed by the hotfixes already available
and the coming SP1.
>Many of us prefer the new design of Vista and find it extremely
>intuitive, this is our opinion, you will never hear me call anyone
>else stupid or other names if their opinion differs then mine.
Actually you have done exactly that and more than once as Goggle
confirms. Again the fatal flaw of all fanboys is they ALWAYS attempt
to speak for others as seen by their frequent use of 'us' and 'we'
implying their opinions as narrow as they might be is the majority
view.
The reality here is zealots often present such weak arguments they
need to attempt to prop them up by making the false claims they are
not just giving their opinion, but rather are speaking for many.
>You will on the other hand hear me call someone stupid if they keep
>using anything they despise so much especially when there are viable
>alternatives.
Again, why I have so much fun exposing fanboys as losers. Cox just got
done saying "you will never hear me call anyone else stupid or other
names if their opinion differs then mine." Now, he does a 180 and
states he reserves the right to call someone stupid if. Priceless!
|
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
