On Fri, 31 Jul 2009 14:37:01 -0700, adamscottmartin
<adamscottmartin[@NOSPAM]hotmail[dot.com]> wrote:
>Thanks for the tip, will use that for now as it is better than nothing.
>Still has to be something that would work better. Would be interested to
>hear any other methods.
If you're running servers a better solution would be Virtual Server.
It runs as a service and is aware of the VMs running, so your server
should wait until your VMs are in a saved state.
--
Cheers,
Steve Jain, Virtual Machine MVP
http://vpc.essjae.com/