"JackFlash" <> wrote in message
news:7351CD5F-52DE-4029-8A63-...
> Indeed I have also posted to the Office group.
> I will take a look at the other groups, but my main concern was
> about
> any major issues I might cause to my original environment or to the
> domain -
> while I assume there would be medium and minor
> issues running some of the regular day to day operations on the X64
> machine.
>
I have worked withy clients with tens of thousands of Vista clients
deployed in 2003 ADs - no major issues.
--
Mike Brannigan
"JackFlash" <> wrote in message
news:7351CD5F-52DE-4029-8A63-...
> Indeed I have also posted to the Office group.
> I will take a look at the other groups, but my main concern was
> about
> any major issues I might cause to my original environment or to the
> domain -
> while I assume there would be medium and minor
> issues running some of the regular day to day operations on the X64
> machine.
>
> "Dave R." wrote:
>
>>
>> "Mike Brannigan" <Mike.Brannigan@localhost> wrote in message
>> news:...
>> > "JackFlash" <> wrote in
>> > message
>> > news:28F7F4A8-3AF1-4FC3-BB7A-...
>> >> Hi Fellows,
>> >>
>> >> Can you please review those questions so we can consider
>> >> deployment
>> >> of Vista
>> >> on the current infrastructure:
>> >>
>> >> 1. Can we then look into approving if there are no security or
>> >> operational
>> >> issues
>> >> if I login my Vista / X64 machine to Win3K or Win2K domain ?
>> >
>> > No problems - Vista is fully supported (x86 or x64) in a
>> > 2003/2000
>> > Active Directory environment
>> >
>> No problems is a bit optimistic. The OP would be well advised to
>> look
>> at the various posings in this and the .networking_sharing and
>> .general
>> groups relating to Remote Desktop, Remote Assistance, file and
>> printer
>> sharing, logon scripts, etc.
>>
>> As to the Office 2003, etc., I don't follow those closely at all,
>> but it
>> would be a good idea to check the Office and Outlook groups for any
>> interoperability issues.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Dave
>>
>>
>>
|