"Chuck" <> wrote in message
news:qyA9p.121150$...
>
> "Bruce Hagen" <> wrote in message
> news:ik6j5a$sgt$...
>>
>> "Chuck" <> wrote in message
>> news:W1A9p.19686$...
>>>
>>> "Bruce Hagen" <> wrote in message
>>> news:ik0jum$vms$...
>>>>>> I thought WM was an improvement over OE. My mistake.
>>>>
>>>> That was the original concept, but Windows Mail was abandoned in
>>>> June, 2006, while Vista was still in beta!
>>>> --
>>>> Bruce Hagen
>>>> MS-MVP Oct. 1, 2004 ~ Sept. 30, 2010
>>>> Imperial Beach, CA
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yet it's still there with Vista. What's the point? We all use live
>>> mail now? Isn't that just a repackaged hotmail? Were is MS headed with
>>> that? I guess everyone either pays for MS Office or use Mozilla. If
>>> we're going to run Mozilla we might as well use their browser too.
>>
>>
>>>We all use live mail now?
>>
>>
>> On the contrary. On this Windows 7 machine, I am using Thunderbird for
>> mail, and Vista's Windows Mail for news. (Yes, you can hack it in). I
>> even replaced Windows Live Movie Maker with Windows Movie Maker 2.6.
>>
>> I don't like, and do not care to use anything with the "Live" branding.
>> (Much of the reason I'm a former MVP).
>> --
>> Bruce Hagen
>> MS-MVP Oct. 1, 2004 ~ Sept. 30, 2010
>> Imperial Beach, CA
>>
>
> Why use Windows Mail for news? Thunderbird is a news client too is it
> not?
Yes, but I used OE for so long and WinMail is about equal. Plus, I want
separate programs for news and mail. To each his own.
--
Bruce Hagen
MS-MVP Oct. 1, 2004 ~ Sept. 30, 2010
Imperial Beach, CA
|