Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista General Discussion > Despite my machine having maximum of 4 gig memory slots, have I wasted my money?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Despite my machine having maximum of 4 gig memory slots, have I wasted my money?

 
 
JethroUK©
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-07-2008
I have just bought 2 gig memory to add to my Vista Premium (32 bit) machine
which already has 2 gig = 4 gig total

Just read an article which states:

Any 32-bit version of Vista editions has approximately 3.3 GBs Maximum
addressable memory

Despite my machine having maximum of 4 gig memory slots, have I wasted my
money?






 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Mike Hall - MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-07-2008
"JethroUK©" <> wrote in message
news:%...
>I have just bought 2 gig memory to add to my Vista Premium (32 bit) machine
>which already has 2 gig = 4 gig total
>
> Just read an article which states:
>
> Any 32-bit version of Vista editions has approximately 3.3 GBs Maximum
> addressable memory
>
> Despite my machine having maximum of 4 gig memory slots, have I wasted my
> money?
>
>
>
>
>
>



Not really.. you get the benefit of RAM over 3gb, and the slight speed
advantage of having paired memory modules..


--
Mike Hall - MVP
How to construct a good post..
http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
http://support.microsoft.com/default...help&style=toc
Mike's Window - My Blog..
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx




 
Reply With Quote
 
Ken Blake
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-08-2008
"JethroUK©" <> wrote in message
news:%...

>I have just bought 2 gig memory to add to my Vista Premium (32 bit) machine
>which already has 2 gig = 4 gig total
>
> Just read an article which states:
>
> Any 32-bit version of Vista editions has approximately 3.3 GBs Maximum
> addressable memory
>
> Despite my machine having maximum of 4 gig memory slots, have I wasted my
> money?




Maybe, maybe not. It depends. Look at the following three points:

1. How much RAM you can make effective use of depends on what apps you run.
2GB may have been enough for you, or having more may give you a performance
improvement. The answer is different for different people.

2. All 32-bit client versions of Windows (not just Vista/XP) have a 4GB
address space. That's the theoretical upper limit beyond which you can not
go.

But you can't use the entire 4GB of address space. Even though you have a
4GB address space, you can only use *around* 3.1GB of RAM. That's because
some of that space is used by hardware and is not available to the operating
system and applications. The amount you can use varies, depending on what
hardware you have installed, but can range from as little as 2GB to as much
as 3.5GB. It's usually around 3.1GB.

Note that the hardware is using the address *space*, not the actual RAM
itself. The rest of the RAM goes unused because there is no address space to
map it to.

3. In all probability you now have more usable RAM than you had before, even
though the usable amount is less than 4GB. So that new larger amount *may*
improve your performance.



 
Reply With Quote
 
JethroUK©
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-08-2008


"Ken Blake" <> wrote in message
news:#...


>
> 3. In all probability you now have more usable RAM than you had before,
> even though the usable amount is less than 4GB. So that new larger amount
> *may* improve your performance.
>
>


Well my "Windows Experience Index" has leapt from 4.2 to a staggering......



....4.2 ( - that's almost confirmed it was a 'total' waste of money and if
there is no noticeable improvement (reason i bought it) I'll sell it on

 
Reply With Quote
 
Mike Hall - MVP
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-08-2008
"JethroUK©" <> wrote in message
news:%...
>
>
> "Ken Blake" <> wrote in message
> news:#...
>
>
>>
>> 3. In all probability you now have more usable RAM than you had before,
>> even though the usable amount is less than 4GB. So that new larger amount
>> *may* improve your performance.
>>
>>

>
> Well my "Windows Experience Index" has leapt from 4.2 to a
> staggering......
>
>
>
> ...4.2 ( - that's almost confirmed it was a 'total' waste of money and
> if there is no noticeable improvement (reason i bought it) I'll sell it on



It confirms nothing.. some of your stuff will benefit from the extra memory
and some may not..


--
Mike Hall - MVP
How to construct a good post..
http://dts-l.com/goodpost.htm
How to use the Microsoft Product Support Newsgroups..
http://support.microsoft.com/default...help&style=toc
Mike's Window - My Blog..
http://msmvps.com/blogs/mikehall/default.aspx




 
Reply With Quote
 
MP Descartes
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-08-2008
JethroUK© <> wrote:

>Well my "Windows Experience Index" has leapt from 4.2 to a staggering......
>
>
>
>...4.2 ( - that's almost confirmed it was a 'total' waste of money and if
>there is no noticeable improvement (reason i bought it) I'll sell it on


Pay no attention to that benchmark. More memory is ALWAYS good if
your system can see/use it.
 
Reply With Quote
 
M.L.
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-09-2008


>> 3. In all probability you now have more usable RAM than you had before,
>> even though the usable amount is less than 4GB. So that new larger amount
>> *may* improve your performance.


>Well my "Windows Experience Index" has leapt from 4.2 to a staggering......


>...4.2 ( - that's almost confirmed it was a 'total' waste of money and if
>there is no noticeable improvement (reason i bought it) I'll sell it on


That 4.2 represents your lowest score of the tests. Your memory score
certainly changed. Mine certainly did when I installed 4GB. It also
increased the amount of shared video RAM.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Mark L. Ferguson
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-09-2008
I have a car with mud tires. This limits the speed (rating) of my car to 100
m.p.h. because the car is unstable above that. If I put in a bigger engine
or a higher ratio rear end, my mud tires still limit my speed rating to 100.

--
Please use the Communities guidelines when posting.
http://www.microsoft.com/wn3/locales...help_en-us.htm
Use the "Ratings" feature. It helps the new users.
Mark L. Ferguson MS-MVP
https://mvp.support.microsoft.com/profile/Mark.Ferguson

"JethroUK©" <> wrote in message
news:#...
>
>
> "Ken Blake" <> wrote in message
> news:#...
>
>
>>
>> 3. In all probability you now have more usable RAM than you had before,
>> even though the usable amount is less than 4GB. So that new larger amount
>> *may* improve your performance.
>>
>>

>
> Well my "Windows Experience Index" has leapt from 4.2 to a
> staggering......
>
>
>
> ...4.2 ( - that's almost confirmed it was a 'total' waste of money and
> if there is no noticeable improvement (reason i bought it) I'll sell it on


 
Reply With Quote
 
JethroUK©
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      11-10-2008


"Mark L. Ferguson" <> wrote in
message news:F4345DF5-F558-42C4-BD17-...
> I have a car with mud tires. This limits the speed (rating) of my car to
> 100 m.p.h. because the car is unstable above that. If I put in a bigger
> engine or a higher ratio rear end, my mud tires still limit my speed
> rating to 100.
>


So, you wasted your money buying a bigger engine - and i wasted my money on
extra memory

Thanks for the excellent analogy which answered my question & confirmed my
suspicions

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Memory Card slots not recognized michaellea Windows Vista Hardware 0 11-03-2008 10:34 PM
Maximum Memory for Vista? Peter Max Windows Vista General Discussion 18 05-01-2008 11:06 AM
how to avoid downclocking while using 3 or 4 memory slots nweissma Windows Vista Hardware 3 09-22-2007 08:29 PM
Finding Used Memory Address Space; Maximum amount of RAM legendof.jonnie@gmail.com Windows Vista Performance 4 04-15-2007 11:31 AM
Maximum recognized memory MajorTom007 Windows Vista General Discussion 3 02-09-2007 09:32 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59