I did not say I extend schema to 2008 I meant our domain and forest level is
2003 and I verified this...
in any case I know why this RPC error is happening to us so I'll post here
in case someone will run into same issue, our servers we are going to use for
DFS are 2008 member servers and 2008 unfortunatelly does not understand
single label domain name i.e. contoso vs contoso.com unfortunatly we have
this as left over from NT days one way to get this fix is to rename domain,
another way is to do domain migration or as a workaround add IPs of all DCs
in domain to local host file for 2008 servers. As soon IPs of all DCs are in
host file and mapped to our single label domain, not the DCs host names ! DFS
wizard to add name space will advance without any errors about RPC
"IT Staff" wrote:
> our domain/forest is 2003 level. recently i upgraded the schema using
> WINDOWS 2008 dvd.
>
> The schema object version shld be 44. instead of 31. You can check
> schupgr.exe and it will show version number before/after schema upgrade.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> "RW" <> wrote in message
> news:7614645A-A0E5-4844-B876-...
> > our domain/forest is 2003 level I verified that schema was extended using
> > ADSI Edit and steps from this article
> > http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/l...yFunctionality
> > revision for CN=ForestUpdates, CN=Windows2003Update is 9 and objectVerion
> > is
> > 31 so I'm guessing we are good here. We never used previously DFS so there
> > is
> > no old namespaces leftover or anything like that now I'm trying to create
> > new
> > name space so I select Namespace server which is going to be one of 2
> > Windows
> > 2008 Storage Servers, next I enter name for our namespace and make sure
> > path
> > is located on SAN vs C drive of W2k8 server, next I'm selecting
> > Domain-based
> > namespace "Enable Windows Server 2008 mode" is grayed out I'm guessing
> > because we are not at 2008 domain level, when I click next I get
> > "\\our_domain_name\root_folder_name: The namespace cannot be queried. The
> > RPC
> > server is unavailable"
> >
> > what I'm missing here?
>
>
>