That may be one reason why Norton products get so much bad press on these
newsgroups; not so much because of the actual product, although previous
versions of Norton haven't been worth recommending, but of the company
Symantec itself.
I've said on many occasions that when Norton Anti Virus, et al were part of
the Norton company then the product was the 'bee all and end all' It was the
de-facto application recommended by the vast majority of people (This is in
the days of Win 95 etc). When Symantec took over the product went steadily
downhill, but then the same thing happened when they took over Powerquest;
their flagship application, Drive Image' certainly took a nose dive.
It looks as if its a case of 'originally a goods product, just wrong
company.'
--
--
John Barnett MVP
Windows XP Associate Expert
Windows Desktop Experience
Web:
http://xphelpandsupport.mvps.org
Web:
http://vistasupport.mvps.org
Web:
http://www.silversurfer-guide.com
The information in this mail/post is supplied "as is". No warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied, is made in relation to the accuracy,
reliability or content of this mail/post. The Author shall not be liable for
any direct, indirect, incidental or consequential damages arising out of the
use of, or inability to use, information or opinions expressed in this
mail/post..
"Ken Blake" <> wrote in message
news:...
> "Richie Hardwick" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>
>> "Ken Blake" <> wrote:
>>
>>>"Gene L." <> wrote in message
>>>news:962066FE-E433-465E-B215-...
>>>
>>>>I frequently see the advice to disable a program such as Norton or
>>>>McAfee
>>>>before making a suggested change to a system but how do you do that? I
>>>>am
>>>>sure you can't mean to uninstall or do you?
>>>
>>>
>>>I'm not the one who gave you the earlier advice, but yes, I would
>>>recommend
>>>uninstalling (permanently). In my view (and that of many of us here),
>>>Norton
>>>is the worst security software available, and McAfee is second worst.
>>>There
>>>are many better alternatives, and some of them are even free.
>>
>> The bad-mouthing of Norton and McAfee has risen (fallen?) to the
>> knee-jerk reaction stage for most of the old-timers and will probably
>> stay there regardless of any changes made to either program/suite.
>>
>> It would appear that the most recent version of the Norton suite is
>> completely different in all respects and if so, it will deserve
>> another look by those of you who regularly trash the Norton products
>> here. I doubt that any of you will give it even the slightest glance.
>
>
> I have heard some early good reports of the same thing with the newest
> version of Norton, but have had no experience with it myself. I *may*
> change my mind about the product when I learn more about it in the future,
> or I may not. I don't yet know enough to make any predictions about it.
>
> But one thing I will *not* change my mind about is the company, Symantec,
> that makes and sells these products. I think their quality and their
> behavior has been terrible. I have no respect for them, and I don't want
> to use or recommend any products from a company that has behaved so badly
> in the past.
>
>
>