Who told you it works better?
It was a gimmick for long-pipes in Pentium 4s.
Most of the current processors have short-pipes and hardly gain from
Hyper-threading.
On average, this improves performance by 11%-14% when running multiple
programs.
If you're running a single program, it's probably hurting performance.
Programs that are memory or cache intensive also reduce performance under
hyper-threading.
Where does it help?
Programs specifically written for multi-threaded use of the CPU. Rendering,
multi-media, etc.
<> wrote in message
news

...
On Sun, 5 Aug 2007 10:54:01 -0700, HectorziN
<> wrote:
>I have Vista Ultimate installed and I installed it having HT activate.
>Now I am interested disabling HT, because it works better to run processes
>not prepared for multitasking.
who in the world told you that ? And where are you getting these antique
programs that will actually install on a hyper threading machine that won't
work ?
>If I disable HT from BIOS, then Windows Vista stops booting just when the
>progress bar (starting windows) should start.
yeah.. And you'll probably see a lot more instabilities if you continue.
>If I run in safe mode, also hangs after loading some drivers.
>The only way to get windows vista to restart again is enabling again HT.
>
>How can I disable HT and get to run Vista again?
Why ? Upgrade the software. Use that hyper threading.. Use the multi
tasking.
I think the machine's already told you it's not going to work with no HT.
--
more pix @
http://members.toast.net/cbminfo/index.html