Everyone is entitled to their opinion. For me Vistas defrag runs quietly in
the background and leaves a well defragged system, as shown on my
PerfectDisk8 analysis. I don't care about a GUI and can see the results on
the PerfectDisk analysis.
"Jerry" <> wrote in message
news:%...
> Sorry but I agree with euro, the defrag in Vista is terrible. When it run
> you have no idea where it is or what it is doing. It gives no choice as
> to what to defrag. It take an eternity to defrag. There are many better
> defraggers and some are free.
>
> "John Barnes" <> wrote in message
> news:%...
>> Vistas defrag works fine and I use my Diskkeeper only for analysing the
>> drive. Haven't ever had to run it.
>>
>> "euroeddie" <> wrote in message
>> news:E4E0426C-ADA9-422D-80EE-...
>>>I saw that one of you works for Diskeeper - I have diskeeper OEM
>>>installed on my computer and running. I notice that when the system runs
>>>slowly, and when I run Diskeeper, the system speeds up (doh - cuz it
>>>defragments the disk). My questions - does Diskeeper automatically run
>>>every so often or do I need to run it manually to keep the disk
>>>defrag-ed? Is there any reason for using the MS defragger? Why can't
>>>Windows be made into a system that runs like OS X which doesn't
>>>constantly need defrag-ing?
>>>
>>> thanks!
>>
>
>
|