Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Update > Do I need to re-install a security patch if I install a Service Pack that idsold

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Do I need to re-install a security patch if I install a Service Pack that idsold

 
 
Kevin
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-08-2003
If I apply a service pack, example: "Windows 2000 SP4",
that is older than a security patch I applied ,
example: "Security Update for Windows 2000 (823980)",
would I have to reapply the security patch "Security
Update for Windows 2000 (823980)" after I installed the
service pack?

I get mixed anwsers from people. People have seen this
issue on NT but it warns them that a re-install of the
patch has to be reapplied. I have not seen such a thing
on windows 2000.

Thanks,
Kevin.


 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Racing Penguin
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-08-2003
yes
"Kevin" <> wrote in message
news:041b01c35dec$e396ed10$...
If I apply a service pack, example: "Windows 2000 SP4",
that is older than a security patch I applied ,
example: "Security Update for Windows 2000 (823980)",
would I have to reapply the security patch "Security
Update for Windows 2000 (823980)" after I installed the
service pack?

I get mixed anwsers from people. People have seen this
issue on NT but it warns them that a re-install of the
patch has to be reapplied. I have not seen such a thing
on windows 2000.

Thanks,
Kevin.



 
Reply With Quote
 
Jonathan Woodard [MSFT]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      08-16-2003
I would give a qualified "no". Windows 2000 and up were designed so that the
order in which you install updates (of any kind, including patches and
service packs) should not matter. Some people will answer "yes" to your
question, perhaps because there have been a few cases where an older update
overwrote a newer one. If you encounter a problem like that, please report
it to us, because order is not supposed to make a difference.

--
Jonathan
Windows Update Support
Microsoft

Please do not send email directly to this alias. This alias is for newsgroup
purposes only.

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
--

"Racing Penguin" <> wrote in message
news:...
> yes
> "Kevin" <> wrote in message
> news:041b01c35dec$e396ed10$...
> If I apply a service pack, example: "Windows 2000 SP4",
> that is older than a security patch I applied ,
> example: "Security Update for Windows 2000 (823980)",
> would I have to reapply the security patch "Security
> Update for Windows 2000 (823980)" after I installed the
> service pack?
>
> I get mixed anwsers from people. People have seen this
> issue on NT but it warns them that a re-install of the
> patch has to be reapplied. I have not seen such a thing
> on windows 2000.
>
> Thanks,
> Kevin.
>
>
>



 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SERVICE PACK 1 INSTALL Toyman Windows Vista File Management 2 12-04-2008 11:58 PM
Service pack won't install look@im.not.here Windows Vista General Discussion 1 06-22-2008 06:29 PM
Service Pack Install Mossie Windows Vista General Discussion 4 05-04-2008 09:34 AM
Can't install security patch 823980 on Windows NT 4.0 Richard N Windows Update 1 08-09-2003 12:00 AM
XP Service Pack won't install reba Windows Update 1 07-23-2003 04:51 PM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59