Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Update > Double lsiting of "Optional" updates - Why?

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Double lsiting of "Optional" updates - Why?

 
 
Octavio
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-24-2008
The following are shown in my computer under my "View Updates History" list:

Windows Live Toolbar 3.01
Windows Live One Care Family Safety
Windows Live Sign-in Assistant
Windows Live Writer

The list indicates that the first "Successful" installation was on
2/16/2008, and the second also "Successful" installation was two days later
on 2/12/2008.

Why the installation twice?

Thanks in advance.

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Shenan Stanley
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-24-2008
Octavio wrote:
> The following are shown in my computer under my "View Updates
> History" list:
> Windows Live Toolbar 3.01
> Windows Live One Care Family Safety
> Windows Live Sign-in Assistant
> Windows Live Writer
>
> The list indicates that the first "Successful" installation was on
> 2/16/2008, and the second also "Successful" installation was two
> days later on 2/12/2008.
>
> Why the installation twice?


I'm confused by the description...
Your time travels faster than mine and in reverse...

"... first ... on 2/16/2008 ..." then "... two days later on 2/12/2008 ..."
Four days difference, in reverse. Not two days forward.

Have you misread or misquoted something?

Those could be manually installed by the way. It is possibly you (or anyone
else who utilizes the computer - if anyone) could have installed it, and
installed it again. Those are also *optional* updates - so you would have
to initate the install I am pretty sure.

http://www.windowslive.com/

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


 
Reply With Quote
 
Octavio
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-24-2008
Yes, I made a mistake with the dates and sequence, you are right.
Assuming that there is nothing wrong now with leaving these there, any
objections to that, or any adverse future outcome? Or should I uninstall
all of them and reinstall it once?
Please advise.

"Shenan Stanley" <> wrote in message
news:uwg31$...
> Octavio wrote:
>> The following are shown in my computer under my "View Updates
>> History" list:
>> Windows Live Toolbar 3.01
>> Windows Live One Care Family Safety
>> Windows Live Sign-in Assistant
>> Windows Live Writer
>>
>> The list indicates that the first "Successful" installation was on
>> 2/16/2008, and the second also "Successful" installation was two
>> days later on 2/12/2008.
>>
>> Why the installation twice?

>
> I'm confused by the description...
> Your time travels faster than mine and in reverse...
>
> "... first ... on 2/16/2008 ..." then "... two days later on 2/12/2008
> ..."
> Four days difference, in reverse. Not two days forward.
>
> Have you misread or misquoted something?
>
> Those could be manually installed by the way. It is possibly you (or
> anyone else who utilizes the computer - if anyone) could have installed
> it, and installed it again. Those are also *optional* updates - so you
> would have to initate the install I am pretty sure.
>
> http://www.windowslive.com/
>
> --
> Shenan Stanley
> MS-MVP
> --
> How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
> http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
>

 
Reply With Quote
 
Shenan Stanley
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-24-2008
Octavio wrote:
> The following are shown in my computer under my "View Updates
> History" list:
> Windows Live Toolbar 3.01
> Windows Live One Care Family Safety
> Windows Live Sign-in Assistant
> Windows Live Writer
>
> The list indicates that the first "Successful" installation was on
> 2/16/2008, and the second also "Successful" installation was two
> days later on 2/12/2008.
>
> Why the installation twice?


Shenan Stanley wrote:
> I'm confused by the description...
> Your time travels faster than mine and in reverse...
>
> "... first ... on 2/16/2008 ..." then "... two days later on
> 2/12/2008 ..." Four days difference, in reverse. Not two days
> forward.
> Have you misread or misquoted something?
>
> Those could be manually installed by the way. It is possibly you
> (or anyone else who utilizes the computer - if anyone) could have
> installed it, and installed it again. Those are also *optional*
> updates - so you would have to initate the install I am pretty sure.
>
> http://www.windowslive.com/


Octavio wrote:
> Yes, I made a mistake with the dates and sequence, you are right.
> Assuming that there is nothing wrong now with leaving these there,
> any objections to that, or any adverse future outcome? Or should I
> uninstall all of them and reinstall it once?
> Please advise.


Are the items in question not working?
(If it ain't broke, don't fix it.)

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html


 
Reply With Quote
 
PA Bear [MS MVP]
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-24-2008
"If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
--
~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
DTS-L http://dts-l.net/

Octavio wrote:
> The following are shown in my computer under my "View Updates History"
> list:
>
> Windows Live Toolbar 3.01
> Windows Live One Care Family Safety
> Windows Live Sign-in Assistant
> Windows Live Writer
>
> The list indicates that the first "Successful" installation was on
> 2/16/2008, and the second also "Successful" installation was two days
> later
> on 2/12/2008.
>
> Why the installation twice?
>
> Thanks in advance.


 
Reply With Quote
 
Octavio
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      02-25-2008
I will probably leave these in. Thanks to all of you who advised.

"PA Bear [MS MVP]" <> wrote in message
news:#...
> "If it ain't broke, don't fix it."
> --
> ~Robear Dyer (PA Bear)
> MS MVP-IE, Mail, Security, Windows Desktop Experience - since 2002
> AumHa VSOP & Admin http://aumha.net
> DTS-L http://dts-l.net/
>
> Octavio wrote:
>> The following are shown in my computer under my "View Updates History"
>> list:
>>
>> Windows Live Toolbar 3.01
>> Windows Live One Care Family Safety
>> Windows Live Sign-in Assistant
>> Windows Live Writer
>>
>> The list indicates that the first "Successful" installation was on
>> 2/16/2008, and the second also "Successful" installation was two days
>> later
>> on 2/12/2008.
>>
>> Why the installation twice?
>>
>> Thanks in advance.

>

 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Elevation required to install "Optional" updates Don Windows Vista Administration 1 06-02-2008 05:02 PM
Languages packs don"t appear anymore in the optional updates Faelan Windows Update 15 08-28-2007 07:24 PM
updating directx. What are "optional components"? Kyle Windows Vista General Discussion 1 08-01-2007 05:15 AM
When WGA attacks: "Optional update delivery is not working" Sbaitso Windows Vista General Discussion 12 11-04-2006 04:06 AM
I got the solution for the problem: "Error number: 0x8024001E" and "Could not start the automatic updates service on local" for the Windows 2000. sabbath Windows Update 0 05-15-2006 02:00 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59