Is that really necessary? I ask because I was reading about this debacle
yesterday, and he made it seem like conversion from dynamic to basic was a
momentary diversion. You seem to be saying it all needs to be blown away and
reformatted.
http://blogs.msdn.com/andypennell/ar...onal-hell.aspx
"Carey Frisch [MVP]" <> wrote in message
news:314F6F99-A3D2-4562-A7B3-...
> One cannot install Windows Vista on a dynamic drive.
> You'll need to delete all the volumes/partitions on that
> drive, create a new partition, then format it NTFS in
> order to install Windows Vista. Vista will automatically
> create a dual-boot loader.
>
> --
> Carey Frisch
> Microsoft MVP
> Windows - Shell/User
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------*-----
>
> "gordo" wrote:
>
> Currently, I have a good computer running XP SP2 plus updates. The
> computer
> has two 80 Gb hard drives, C: and D:. I would like to install Vista on the
> D: drive and configure the system for dual booting. My C: drive is show as
> a
> Basic drive (Disk 0) and my D: drive is designated as a Dynamic Drive
> (Disk
> 1). Both are formatted NTFS.
>
> I tried to follow a thread lately about not being able to install Vista on
> a
> Dynamic drive. Is this really true? And, if so, I suppose I will have to
> designate my D: drive as Basic. I have read the knowledge base article on
> how to do this.
>
> Is there any truth to this supposed requirement?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Gordo
>
>