Earlier Vista Update

I want to revert my Vista back to the way it was two updates ago. How do I
do that? I remember it being in Administrative Tools somewhere. I've done it
before but now I'm lost. Please help.

"Ken" <> wrote in message
news:...
>I want to revert my Vista back to the way it was two updates ago. How do I
>do that? I remember it being in Administrative Tools somewhere. I've done
>it before but now I'm lost. Please help.


Hit Start...type restore...then select System Restore.

--
Ens causa sui
Fit caedes omnibus locis

"teric benarma" <> wrote in message
news:4904a6ce$...
> see why you cant become number one idiot of this newsgroup? You go around
> helping people!
>
> Frank and spanky never do that! !!!!!
>
> Sorry you blew your chance, although your advice was simple, it was
> usefully to the OP
>


Is burnt america the name you were shooting for ?

The genius of great thought is in its simplicity.

--
Ens causa sui
Fit caedes omnibus locis

"teric benarma" <> wrote in message
news:...
> no, sorry. Are you a pyromaniac?
>


Fire good.
Winter approaches.
After the fall.
--
Ens causa sui
Fit caedes omnibus locis

"D. Eth" <> wrote in message news:ge29pn$to2$...
> "teric benarma" <> wrote in message
> news:...
>> no, sorry. Are you a pyromaniac?
>>
>
>
> Fire good.
> Winter approaches.
> After the fall.
> --
> Ens causa sui
> Fit caedes omnibus locis
>


Some mensan.
Oh, bother.

--
Ens causa sui
Fit caedes omnibus locis

"teric benarma" <> wrote in message
news:...
>>> Fire good.
>
> Fire not good. Fire, technology of cavemen and others demi-humans of your
> kind. Fire converts fossil fuel into carbon dioxide and other pollutants
> that contribute to global warming.
>
> What is good is cold fusion that is nuclear reactions are normal room
> temperatures and zero point energy aka energy from the vacuum.
> These and other new methods do not create chemical combustion and they
> both create virtually infinite energy without pollution.
>
>> Some mensan.
>
> Some dork!
>
>
>
> "D. Eth" <> wrote in message news:ge2aj6$ib$...
>> "D. Eth" <> wrote in message
>> news:ge29pn$to2$...
>>> "teric benarma" <> wrote in message
>>> news:...
>>>> no, sorry. Are you a pyromaniac?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Fire good.
>>> Winter approaches.
>>> After the fall.
>>> --
>>> Ens causa sui
>>> Fit caedes omnibus locis
>>
>>
>> Some mensan.
>> Oh, bother.
>>
>> --
>> Ens causa sui
>> Fit caedes omnibus locis
>


Cold fusion ?
Oh, you must live in England...the cold fusion fraud factory.
You are on a subject I will dominate.
Fish on !

--
Ens causa sui
Fit caedes omnibus locis

"teric benarma" <> wrote in message
news:...
>>> Fire good.
>
> Fire not good. Fire, technology of cavemen and others demi-humans of your
> kind. Fire converts fossil fuel into carbon dioxide and other pollutants
> that contribute to global warming.
>
> What is good is cold fusion that is nuclear reactions are normal room
> temperatures and zero point energy aka energy from the vacuum.
> These and other new methods do not create chemical combustion and they
> both create virtually infinite energy without pollution.
>
>> Some mensan.
>
> Some dork!
>
>
>
> "D. Eth" <> wrote in message news:ge2aj6$ib$...
>> "D. Eth" <> wrote in message
>> news:ge29pn$to2$...
>>> "teric benarma" <> wrote in message
>>> news:...
>>>> no, sorry. Are you a pyromaniac?
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Fire good.
>>> Winter approaches.
>>> After the fall.
>>> --
>>> Ens causa sui
>>> Fit caedes omnibus locis
>>
>>
>> Some mensan.
>> Oh, bother.
>>
>> --
>> Ens causa sui
>> Fit caedes omnibus locis
>


Room temperature ?
15,000,000 C is pretty hot.
Get a fan.
What a moron.
Fusion....fusing light atoms into heavier ones !
The sun does it.
Other stars do it.
Doesn't happen in warm water.
And lithium water taste funny.

--
Ens causa sui
Fit caedes omnibus locis

"teric benarma" <> wrote in message
news:4904bd60$...
> So you are stupid enough to think that cold fusion was a fraud? LOL
>
> I rest my case! Sorry to burst your bubble, cold fusion is a scientific
> FACT, they just don't understand the principles behind it. There are
> several competing theories behind HOW it works, but only an idiot would
> still dispute if it works or not.
>
> Unless you still think the earth is flat too? LOL
>
> You are not up to date with anything scientific, NO WONDER!
>
>
>
>
> "D. Eth" <> wrote in message
> news:ge2e22$dm7$...
>> "teric benarma" <> wrote in message
>> news:...
>>>>> Fire good.
>>>
>>> Fire not good. Fire, technology of cavemen and others demi-humans of
>>> your kind. Fire converts fossil fuel into carbon dioxide and other
>>> pollutants that contribute to global warming.
>>>
>>> What is good is cold fusion that is nuclear reactions are normal room
>>> temperatures and zero point energy aka energy from the vacuum.
>>> These and other new methods do not create chemical combustion and they
>>> both create virtually infinite energy without pollution.
>>>
>>>> Some mensan.
>>>
>>> Some dork!
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> "D. Eth" <> wrote in message
>>> news:ge2aj6$ib$...
>>>> "D. Eth" <> wrote in message
>>>> news:ge29pn$to2$...
>>>>> "teric benarma" <> wrote in message
>>>>> news:...
>>>>>> no, sorry. Are you a pyromaniac?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Fire good.
>>>>> Winter approaches.
>>>>> After the fall.
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ens causa sui
>>>>> Fit caedes omnibus locis
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Some mensan.
>>>> Oh, bother.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ens causa sui
>>>> Fit caedes omnibus locis
>>>
>>
>>
>> Cold fusion ?
>> Oh, you must live in England...the cold fusion fraud factory.
>> You are on a subject I will dominate.
>> Fish on !
>>
>> --
>> Ens causa sui
>> Fit caedes omnibus locis
>


Show a link to cold fusion that runs anything beyond a billionth of a
second.
It's BS.
Even fusion created in particle accelerators occur at high temps.
Show an actually continuous fusion reaction at "room temperature".
Not possible.
Only at sub-nano secound time frames...which becomes uncertain.
So, it doesn't happen.

--
Ens causa sui
Fit caedes omnibus locis

"teric benarma" <> wrote in message
news:4904c463$...
>I suggest you researching this in depth before blundering foolish crap..
>
> There is a reaction and access energy is apparent. This has been verified
> by many scientists. Sure not everyone can reproduce it.
>

^^^^ LOL.
That "meant" nothing.
Access energy is apparent ?
Star Trek ?
LOL


> But if you would see a ball that's on the ground just call up towards the
> sky EVEN ONCE that would mean that a law of physics (mainly gravity) has
> some aspect of it that we do not understand yet. Then the scientists
> should POUNCE on it and try to explain it with everything they got. Not go
> into political arguments that revolve around money. or disputing why they
> did not follow the established path for presenting their results. Hot
> fusion has cost millions if not billions of dollars and has never produced
> results, that money went somewhere... can you guess where? To the pockets
> of those who DON'T LIKE the idea of 2 chemists creating cold fusion! lol
>
> Physicists have been trying to create hot fusion, for them to have 2
> chemists take away their glory is something they would never accept!
>
> And then there is a theory of the electrical sun, that postulates that its
> not even nuclear reactions that is fueling the sun, but electrical
> phenomena! WE HAVE THE WHOLE THEORY WRONG IN THE FIRST PLACE!
>
> Oh cold fusion real. The name the chose is unfortunate indeed, but there
> are other reasons why they don't want it to come out. Mainly MONEY and
> POWER. They have been fighting this and the result is the continuation of
> the destruction of Earth.
>
> But lets say for a moment that cold fusion is impossible (which its
> not)there are many ways to produce free energy from water. HECK Tesla
> could create infinite clean power 100 + Years ago!
>
> USE GOOGLE OR YOUTUBE AND EDUCATE YOURSELF AND STOP BLABBERING!
>

Theoretically, with all the empty space in matter, a 2x4 should pass thru
your head without effect.
Try it.
LOL.
What a friggen mensa dropout.
Watching NOVA without comprehension is injurious to science.
You are a funny little boy.
--
Ens causa sui
Fit caedes omnibus locis

teric benarma wrote:
> People once thought that you needed wings to fly because they saw birds
> and thought that everything needs wings to fly.
>
> Yet there are other types of flight that do not involve wings.
------------------------------------
hehehe...which begs the question...when is your cardboard space ship
going to achieve liftoff?...LOL!