Expert advice

I can understand the trend to Linux. If I have to become an expert to fix MS
implementation problems, why not learn a bit about Linux and never have to
sort out the problems you paid for NOT to have to solve for a big fat rich
company at no cost to them?

Unless you think paying somebody who can't cut it elsewhere to answer
questions about things which are supposed to work without hassles for eight
years is an expense...

Supersoul777 wrote:
> I can understand the trend to Linux. If I have to become an expert
> to fix MS implementation problems, why not learn a bit about Linux
> and never have to sort out the problems you paid for NOT to have to
> solve for a big fat rich company at no cost to them?
>
> Unless you think paying somebody who can't cut it elsewhere to
> answer questions about things which are supposed to work without
> hassles for eight years is an expense...

Another one that believes all their issues would disappear if they switched
to *nix or macintosh, eh?
( You did not mention the latter - but it is based off BSD/*nix... ;-) )

You don't have to become an expert in anything to fix issues in any OS nor
do you really have to pay anyone. With a little common sense - you can
prevent most issues from happening. With good backups and perhaps a little
imaging involved - even if you have problems - you are a short period away
from being at a stage before you had any issues.

But - I digress - what is your actual issue?

--
Shenan Stanley
MS-MVP
--
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way
http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html