Greetings Rick,
The WebMessenger hasn't been updated in a long time so naturally it won't get the roaming
information. There is however an update planned, but I do not know if this is a feature that
will be added.
Agree with the message logs. Although, it does seem that feature has been slightly forgotten
as it hasn't been updated or changed since 6.0.
--
Jonathan Kay
Microsoft MVP - Windows Live Messenger/MSN Messenger/Windows Messenger
Associate Expert
http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/expertzone/
Messenger Resources -
http://messenger.jonathankay.com
All posts unless otherwise specified are (c) 2006 Jonathan Kay.
You *must* contact me for redistribution rights.
--
"Rick" <> wrote in message
news:76D865DE-B0A1-4727-B2E7-...
> Great! The roaming feature (personal message and photo) is a step in the
> right direction. I checked but it doesn't work with WebMessenger! Is this
> indented? Does it only work with the 8.1 Beta software installed on a local
> computer? That would make little sense because a minority of computers have a
> WL Messenger locally installed and few people always use the latest releases.
>
> Secondly, and most important, I would like you to extend the roaming
> features, in the clever way GoogleMail/GoogleTalk do. I am so sick and tired
> of having several chat histories/logs on different computers, at home, at
> work at a friend's, and when I travel and use the WebMessenger all
> conversations are lost anyway. This situation is annoying!
> Please let the chat histories "roam" and make them save to ONE PLACE,
> wherever and whenever accessible and searchable in a convenient way in my
> Hotmail/LiveMail account, like GoogleMail has it. Communication should work
> like a unified messaging system, handling chats and e-mail like equal forms
> of conversations. I use messenger for business also and generally I want to
> keep precious information at hand also when I travel!
> I think now that we have enough storage in the e-mail accounts, the option
> of saving the chat histories would not pose a capacity problem.
>
> Thank you for considering and implementing this! I hope then WLM will be
> again ahead of Google in this case.
> Rick