I agree. When I got my first Vista computer I tried the built-in CD/DVD
writing software and it produced a coaster. Now I use nothing but Roxio.
The IT people at my college recommend Nero but I haven't tried it.
Earle
"Stan Starinski" <China@stealsUSJobsPatentsSoftwareMusicVideo> wrote in
message news:u48wIY%...
> You get what you pay for - in this case NOTHING.
> Vista's built-in optical disk recording is a joke.
>
> Secondly, if you insist on not buying a "REAL" application like Sonic
> (currently owned by Roxio) Creator 2010 or some people will mention Nero,
> but I firmly know it's inferior to Roxio; so if oyu insist on using
> Windows own primitive recording, then ALWAYS use MASTERING format, not
> LiveFile system.
>
> Besides, what really irritates computer & technical professionals as
> myself, is when a company invents some commercial "catchy phrase" for a
> well-known existign techinical term.
> Live System is nothing but another temr for "UDF" File Format.
> Why Microsoft is using "LiveFileSystem" name is obvious - too many people
> are too stupid to understand UDF abbreviation.
>
> Avoid it by all mans.
> use Mastering option, of course you lose ability to drag/drop files onto a
> disk in real-time, but what is more important - writing a secure,
> compatible CD/DVD disk and being able to use it 20 years later, OR
> drag/drop files which you consequently lose or unable to access just
> because something is slightly different on another computer??
>
> Still I reccoment spending a few dollars and getting a real, i.e. dedicate
> CD/DVD writing software, Roxio being best, there're many others - I am
> using besides Roxio, also a French company "CopyToDVD" that costs mere
> $20-30 and very powerful, they've been on the market almost as long as
> Roxio, except they're more into simpler, data-oriented products, rather
> than a complete suite that Roxio or Nero offer.
>
> Avoid LiveSystem.
|