Gates: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient"

Gates: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient"
http://arstechnica.com/journals/micr...more-efficient

My comment: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient" THAN THE
BLOATED STUPID CRAP MONSTER OF AN OS CALLED VISTA!!!!

So is MS acknowledging they have created the most stupid, slow, bloated OS
ever to appear on the face of this earth? And what a stupid name to give a
stupid OS, Vista..... Hahhhhh.....

I guess this a hard blow for the vista fanboys like frank... but they are
used to shrugging off FACTS! lol

Gee they are stupid


some text from the article:

Nevertheless, it's [Vista] far from perfect, and not only on the security
front. While many tests show that Vista outperforms XP on some high-end
computers, the average computer system does not run Windows Vista as well as
it does Windows XP. This will of course change as the average computer
becomes more powerful and as Microsoft tweaks the operating system (SP1
already offers some help), but the fact of the matter is that Vista is
recognized as a slow operating system.

Many have therefore turned their hopes to Windows 7. Maybe, just maybe,
Microsoft will not increase the minimum requirements as it did from Windows
XP to Windows Vista. Considering that Microsoft hopes to get Windows 7 out
the door faster than it did with Vista (which came out six years after XP,
compared to the typical three) this is entirely possible, and Bill Gates has
all but confirmed that Windows 7 will focus on performance improvements:

We're hard at work, I would say, on the next version, which we call Windows
7. I'm very excited about the work being done there. The ability to be lower
power, take less memory, be more efficient, and have lots more connections
up to the mobile phone, so those scenarios connect up well to make it a
great platform for the best gaming that can be done, to connect up to the
thing being done out on the Internet, so that, for example, if you have two
personal computers, that your files automatically are synchronized between
them, and so you don't have a lot of work to move that data back and forth.
One must remember though: Windows 7 is still in the development stage and
Bill Gates touched upon a lot more than just performance improvements for
Windows in his high-hopes speech at the Windows Digital Lifestyle Consortium
in Japan.

On May 13, 12:50*pm, "Clear Windows" <carlfered...@wizzmail.com>
wrote:
> Gates: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient"http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2008/05/12/gates-window...
>
> My comment: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient" *THAN THE
> BLOATED STUPID CRAP MONSTER OF AN OS CALLED VISTA!!!!
>
> So is MS acknowledging they have created the most stupid, slow, bloated OS
> ever to appear on the face of this earth? And what a stupid name to give a
> stupid OS, Vista..... Hahhhhh.....
>
> I guess this a hard blow for the vista fanboys like frank... but they are
> used to shrugging off FACTS! lol
>
> Gee they are stupid
>
> some text from the article:
>
> Nevertheless, it's [Vista] far from perfect, and not only on the security
> front. While many tests show that Vista outperforms XP on some high-end
> computers, the average computer system does not run Windows Vista as well as
> it does Windows XP. This will of course change as the average computer
> becomes more powerful and as Microsoft tweaks the operating system (SP1
> already offers some help), but the fact of the matter is that Vista is
> recognized as a slow operating system.
>
> Many have therefore turned their hopes to Windows 7. Maybe, just maybe,
> Microsoft will not increase the minimum requirements as it did from Windows
> XP to Windows Vista. Considering that Microsoft hopes to get Windows 7 out
> the door faster than it did with Vista (which came out six years after XP,
> compared to the typical three) this is entirely possible, and Bill Gates has
> all but confirmed that Windows 7 will focus on performance improvements:
>
> We're hard at work, I would say, on the next version, which we call Windows
> 7. I'm very excited about the work being done there. The ability to be lower
> power, take less memory, be more efficient, and have lots more connections
> up to the mobile phone, so those scenarios connect up well to make it a
> great platform for the best gaming that can be done, to connect up to the
> thing being done out on the Internet, so that, for example, if you have two
> personal computers, that your files automatically are synchronized between
> them, and so you don't have a lot of work to move that data back and forth..
> One must remember though: Windows 7 is still in the development stage and
> Bill Gates touched upon a lot more than just performance improvements for
> Windows in his high-hopes speech at the Windows Digital Lifestyle Consortium
> in Japan.

Damn. You really are stupid. You just can't wait to find any
negative print about Vista and get this big "hard on" to rush to the
group and spew your garbage. Who really gives a RATS ASS? Why not go
to the local YMCA and hand out towels to the senior citizens?

There is not much good news about Vista... EVER! lol

haven't you noticed, or are you living under a slimy rock?.. don't tell
me... I know the answer to that question.



"Bill Yanaire" <> wrote in message
news:2c474bd7-ac06-49ae-9992-...
> On May 13, 12:50 pm, "Clear Windows" <carlfered...@wizzmail.com>
> wrote:
>> Gates: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more
>> efficient"http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2008/05/12/gates-window...
>>
>> My comment: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient" THAN THE
>> BLOATED STUPID CRAP MONSTER OF AN OS CALLED VISTA!!!!
>>
>> So is MS acknowledging they have created the most stupid, slow, bloated
>> OS
>> ever to appear on the face of this earth? And what a stupid name to give
>> a
>> stupid OS, Vista..... Hahhhhh.....
>>
>> I guess this a hard blow for the vista fanboys like frank... but they are
>> used to shrugging off FACTS! lol
>>
>> Gee they are stupid
>>
>> some text from the article:
>>
>> Nevertheless, it's [Vista] far from perfect, and not only on the security
>> front. While many tests show that Vista outperforms XP on some high-end
>> computers, the average computer system does not run Windows Vista as well
>> as
>> it does Windows XP. This will of course change as the average computer
>> becomes more powerful and as Microsoft tweaks the operating system (SP1
>> already offers some help), but the fact of the matter is that Vista is
>> recognized as a slow operating system.
>>
>> Many have therefore turned their hopes to Windows 7. Maybe, just maybe,
>> Microsoft will not increase the minimum requirements as it did from
>> Windows
>> XP to Windows Vista. Considering that Microsoft hopes to get Windows 7
>> out
>> the door faster than it did with Vista (which came out six years after
>> XP,
>> compared to the typical three) this is entirely possible, and Bill Gates
>> has
>> all but confirmed that Windows 7 will focus on performance improvements:
>>
>> We're hard at work, I would say, on the next version, which we call
>> Windows
>> 7. I'm very excited about the work being done there. The ability to be
>> lower
>> power, take less memory, be more efficient, and have lots more
>> connections
>> up to the mobile phone, so those scenarios connect up well to make it a
>> great platform for the best gaming that can be done, to connect up to the
>> thing being done out on the Internet, so that, for example, if you have
>> two
>> personal computers, that your files automatically are synchronized
>> between
>> them, and so you don't have a lot of work to move that data back and
>> forth.
>> One must remember though: Windows 7 is still in the development stage and
>> Bill Gates touched upon a lot more than just performance improvements for
>> Windows in his high-hopes speech at the Windows Digital Lifestyle
>> Consortium
>> in Japan.
>
> Damn. You really are stupid. You just can't wait to find any
> negative print about Vista and get this big "hard on" to rush to the
> group and spew your garbage. Who really gives a RATS ASS? Why not go
> to the local YMCA and hand out towels to the senior citizens?
>

On May 13, 12:59*pm, "Clear Windows" <carlfered...@wizzmail.com>
wrote:
> There is not much good news about Vista... EVER! lol
>
> haven't *you noticed, or are you living under a slimy rock?.. don't tell
> me... I know the answer to that question.
>
> "Bill Yanaire" <BillYana...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:2c474bd7-ac06-49ae-9992-...
>
>
>
> > On May 13, 12:50 pm, "Clear Windows" <carlfered...@wizzmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> Gates: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more
> >> efficient"http://arstechnica.com/journals/microsoft.ars/2008/05/12/gates-window...
>
> >> My comment: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient" THAN THE
> >> BLOATED STUPID CRAP MONSTER OF AN OS CALLED VISTA!!!!
>
> >> So is MS acknowledging they have created the most stupid, slow, bloated
> >> OS
> >> ever to appear on the face of this earth? And what a stupid name to give
> >> a
> >> stupid OS, Vista..... Hahhhhh.....
>
> >> I guess this a hard blow for the vista fanboys like frank... but they are
> >> used to shrugging off FACTS! lol
>
> >> Gee they are stupid
>
> >> some text from the article:
>
> >> Nevertheless, it's [Vista] far from perfect, and not only on the security
> >> front. While many tests show that Vista outperforms XP on some high-end
> >> computers, the average computer system does not run Windows Vista as well
> >> as
> >> it does Windows XP. This will of course change as the average computer
> >> becomes more powerful and as Microsoft tweaks the operating system (SP1
> >> already offers some help), but the fact of the matter is that Vista is
> >> recognized as a slow operating system.
>
> >> Many have therefore turned their hopes to Windows 7. Maybe, just maybe,
> >> Microsoft will not increase the minimum requirements as it did from
> >> Windows
> >> XP to Windows Vista. Considering that Microsoft hopes to get Windows 7
> >> out
> >> the door faster than it did with Vista (which came out six years after
> >> XP,
> >> compared to the typical three) this is entirely possible, and Bill Gates
> >> has
> >> all but confirmed that Windows 7 will focus on performance improvements:
>
> >> We're hard at work, I would say, on the next version, which we call
> >> Windows
> >> 7. I'm very excited about the work being done there. The ability to be
> >> lower
> >> power, take less memory, be more efficient, and have lots more
> >> connections
> >> up to the mobile phone, so those scenarios connect up well to make it a
> >> great platform for the best gaming that can be done, to connect up to the
> >> thing being done out on the Internet, so that, for example, if you have
> >> two
> >> personal computers, that your files automatically are synchronized
> >> between
> >> them, and so you don't have a lot of work to move that data back and
> >> forth.
> >> One must remember though: Windows 7 is still in the development stage and
> >> Bill Gates touched upon a lot more than just performance improvements for
> >> Windows in his high-hopes speech at the Windows Digital Lifestyle
> >> Consortium
> >> in Japan.
>
> > Damn. *You really are stupid. *You just can't wait to find any
> > negative print about Vista and get this big "hard on" to rush to the
> > group and spew your garbage. *Who really gives a RATS ASS? *Why not go
> > to the local YMCA and hand out towels to the senior citizens?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

No, I live down the street from the rock. You live under the rock

LOL, so many idiots sat there with 2GB of RAM but think Vista is bloated
because the RAM meter shows 40% in use at idle.

My advice: open the PC and unplug the RAM, then it won't be in use it
will be as much use to you unplugged, if it's not being used.

Long answer: What you call BLOAT is in fact making everything run faster by
loading things into memory so they run almost instantly when you click the
icon - try running "top" on Linux or Mac OS X - the inactive part, is memory
that's full, but can be emptied should be needed. Vista does this too, only
pre-emptively.

Vista may run slower for some apps, because it needs to emulate the old GDI
way of drawing to the screen. Programs that use the new APIs shouldn't have
this problem. Mac OSX users didn't moan because their classic apps ran slow
in "Classic Mode" - they accepted the need to evolve.

So stop moaning. Just as people said they loved Windows 2000 when XP came
out, and how everyone suddenly loved Windows 95's lack of Active Desktop
(and er.. USB Support) when Windows 98 was released... History repeats
itself.

Notice how I skipped Windows ME
Now for another beer....

Marc

Clear Windows wrote:

> Gates: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient"
> http://arstechnica.com/journals/micr...more-efficient
>
>
> My comment: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient" THAN THE
> BLOATED STUPID CRAP MONSTER OF AN OS CALLED VISTA!!!!
>
> So is MS acknowledging they have created the most stupid, slow, bloated OS
> ever to appear on the face of this earth? And what a stupid name to give a
> stupid OS, Vista..... Hahhhhh.....
>
> I guess this a hard blow for the vista fanboys like frank... but they
> are used to shrugging off FACTS! lol

What facts? Vista is and you're not! W7 isn't (yet) and you're still
nothing. You are proly one of the most ignorant assholes in this ng
cause you can't accept the fat that Vista is...it's in the market place,
has over a 150+ millions users and there is nothing, absolutely nothing
in this world you can do able it! Hahaha...and I bet that drives a moron
idiot like you nuts!!!
Oh, and you're really fukkin stupid!...LOL!
Frank

Clear Windows wrote:

Read'em and weep ****-for-brains...LOL!

"Vista does appear to be Microsoft's most secure OS to date."

"...many tests show that Vista outperforms XP on some high-end computers,"

Frank

On Tue, 13 May 2008 14:39:05 -0700, Frank <> wrote:

>Clear Windows wrote:
>
>> Gates: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient"
>> http://arstechnica.com/journals/micr...more-efficient
>>
>>
>> My comment: Windows 7 will "take less memory, be more efficient" THAN THE
>> BLOATED STUPID CRAP MONSTER OF AN OS CALLED VISTA!!!!
>>
>> So is MS acknowledging they have created the most stupid, slow, bloated OS
>> ever to appear on the face of this earth? And what a stupid name to give a
>> stupid OS, Vista..... Hahhhhh.....
>>
>> I guess this a hard blow for the vista fanboys like frank... but they
>> are used to shrugging off FACTS! lol
>
>What facts? Vista is and you're not! W7 isn't (yet) and you're still
>nothing. You are proly one of the most ignorant assholes in this ng
>cause you can't accept the fat that Vista is...it's in the market place,
>has over a 150+ millions users and there is nothing, absolutely nothing
>in this world you can do able it! Hahaha...and I bet that drives a moron
>idiot like you nuts!!!
>Oh, and you're really fukkin stupid!...LOL!
>Frank


Get back in your padded cell you fukking idiot and shut the door.

On Tue, 13 May 2008 15:33:39 -0700, Frank <> wrote:

>Clear Windows wrote:
>
>Read'em and weep ****-for-brains...LOL!
>
>"Vista does appear to be Microsoft's most secure OS to date."
>
>"...many tests show that Vista outperforms XP on some high-end computers,"
>
>Frank

The little chimp Frank cherry picking.

Read following and weep Frankie poo:

On speaking of Vista:

Nevertheless, it's far from perfect, and not only on the security
front. While many tests show that Vista outperforms XP on some
high-end computers, the average computer system does not run Windows
Vista as well as it does Windows XP.

What of the above is a retarded goof off like you Frank too damn
stupid to understand?

This will of course change as the average computer becomes more
powerful and as Microsoft tweaks the operating system (SP1 already
offers some help), but the fact of the matter is that Vista is
recognized as a slow operating system.

http://arstechnica.com/journals/micr...more-efficient

"Adam Albright" <> wrote in message
news:...

> Nevertheless, it's far from perfect, and not only on the security
> front. While many tests show that Vista outperforms XP on some
> high-end computers, the average computer system does not run Windows
> Vista as well as it does Windows XP.

Specifically, what kind of computer would that be where Vista outperforms
XP?

32 processors per core, say @ 5GHz, 8TB flash drive, 8GHz Video processor
with 32GB RAM and hasn't been invented yet. All with fibre optic
interconnects and no XP drivers. That would do it.