ugh, I meant the 4.x static route was /24
"Bruce Johnson" wrote:
> I believe that if I increase the subnet in that fashion, then the internal
> network at each site would need the same subnet change. Then client devices
> would route as well. I am hoping to create a scenario where just my server
> resources are aware of the route. They use that gateway, while the clients
> are using another gateway.
>
> I added a 4.x route /16 at the 2.x site, and a traceroute to 4.x now stops
> at the RAS adapter ip.
>
> "Bill Grant" wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > "Bruce Johnson" <> wrote in message
> > news:C7252793-5FA1-4F6D-831B-...
> > > I have 11 sites doing demand dial into the 12th. RRAS 2008 is used for
> > > the
> > > connections. The default static routes that are created exist. The host
> > > is
> > > 192.168.1.1, while the sites are 192.168.x.1. I would like to establish
> > > routing between 192.168.2.x and 192.168.4.x through the 192.168.1.1
> > > connection. It seems the static routes built in 1.1 would be enough.
> > >
> > > When I tracert from 4.x to 2.x, it hangs at 2.1.
> >
> > It won't work by default. The central machine has routes to all of the
> > other machines, but the satellite machines only have a subnet route for the
> > central site.
> >
> > To route from one satellite site to another through the central site you
> > need to use a hub and spoke technique. The traffic goes down a spoke to the
> > hub then back up the correct spoke. You have the modify the static route at
> > the satellite site to send traffic for the other satellite site to the hub.
> > For instance, if you change the route to 192.168.0.0/16 (bundled routing),
> > all sites will route.
> >
> >
> >
|
Similar Threads
Linear Mode
