Help! Dependency service or group failed to start

"Gene E. Bloch" <not-> wrote in message
news:f227wmjd764c$.1kbvbhn29ycf3$... .
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:03:22 -0400, Michael wrote:
>
>> "Gene E. Bloch" <not-> wrote in message
>> news:1pei9tqhte23g$.yepu1nd99loc$... .
>>> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:49:11 -0400, Michael wrote:
>>> Please notice that the guy you yelled at didn't answer the original
>>> post,
>>> but a post dated "Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:41:33 -0500".
>>>
>>> Yes, the thread may have started four years ago[1], but AmarAkbarAnthony
>>> was not replying to ancient material.
>>>
>>> [1] Assuming that you correctly computed the time interval between
>>> 13-12-2007 (or in American notation, 12/13/2007) and 8/20/10. I happen
>>> to
>>> see it as 2 years, 8 months, 7 days. From an app I have, it's 981 days,
>>> which works out to 2.688 years.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
>>
>> Damn Gene! You have way too much time on your hands. This still doesn't
>> resolve the fact he's a techarena moron.
>
> I was addressing something else, namely your tendency to scream...speaking
> of too much time on someone's hands. In fact, I meant to point out that
> your accusations against AmarAkbarAnthony were way off the mark...
>
> --
> Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)

Does this mean an argument is eminent?

--

"Don't pick a fight with an old man.
If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you."

"AmarAkbarAnthony" <> wrote in message
news:...
>
> Gene E. Bloch;5040631 Wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:03:22 -0400, Michael wrote:
>>
>> > "Gene E. Bloch" <not-> wrote in message
>> > news:1pei9tqhte23g$.yepu1nd99loc$... .
>> >> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:49:11 -0400, Michael wrote:
>> >> Please notice that the guy you yelled at didn't answer the original
>> post,
>> >> but a post dated "Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:41:33 -0500".
>> >>
>> >> Yes, the thread may have started four years ago[1], but
>> AmarAkbarAnthony
>> >> was not replying to ancient material.
>> >>
>> >> [1] Assuming that you correctly computed the time interval between
>> >> 13-12-2007 (or in American notation, 12/13/2007) and 8/20/10. I
>> happen to
>> >> see it as 2 years, 8 months, 7 days. From an app I have, it's 981
>> days,
>> >> which works out to 2.688 years.
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
>> >
>> > Damn Gene! You have way too much time on your hands. This still
>> doesn't
>> > resolve the fact he's a techarena moron.
>>
>> I was addressing something else, namely your tendency to
>> scream...speaking
>> of too much time on someone's hands. In fact, I meant to point out that
>> your accusations against AmarAkbarAnthony were way off the mark...
>>
>> --
>> Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
>
> I dont know why u people are targeting me..!
> thnks 4 ur support Gene E. Bloch.
>
>
> --
> AmarAkbarAnthony
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> AmarAkbarAnthony's Profile: http://forums.techarena.in/members/259902.htm
> View this thread: http://forums.techarena.in/vista-help/870516.htm
>
> http://forums.techarena.in
>

Could be because a techarena moron.

--

"Don't pick a fight with an old man.
If he is too old to fight, he'll just kill you."

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 13:07:31 -0400, Michael wrote:

> "Gene E. Bloch" <not-> wrote in message
> news:f227wmjd764c$.1kbvbhn29ycf3$... .
>> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:03:22 -0400, Michael wrote:
>>
>>> "Gene E. Bloch" <not-> wrote in message
>>> news:1pei9tqhte23g$.yepu1nd99loc$... .
>>>> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:49:11 -0400, Michael wrote:
>>>> Please notice that the guy you yelled at didn't answer the original
>>>> post,
>>>> but a post dated "Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:41:33 -0500".
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the thread may have started four years ago[1], but AmarAkbarAnthony
>>>> was not replying to ancient material.
>>>>
>>>> [1] Assuming that you correctly computed the time interval between
>>>> 13-12-2007 (or in American notation, 12/13/2007) and 8/20/10. I happen
>>>> to
>>>> see it as 2 years, 8 months, 7 days. From an app I have, it's 981 days,
>>>> which works out to 2.688 years.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
>>>
>>> Damn Gene! You have way too much time on your hands. This still doesn't
>>> resolve the fact he's a techarena moron.
>>
>> I was addressing something else, namely your tendency to scream...speaking
>> of too much time on someone's hands. In fact, I meant to point out that
>> your accusations against AmarAkbarAnthony were way off the mark...
>>
>> --
>> Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
>
> Does this mean an argument is eminent?

Not eminent, & also not imminent.

Expect no further posts from me in this subthread.

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)

On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 03:50:56 -0500, AmarAkbarAnthony wrote:

> Gene E. Bloch;5040631 Wrote:
>> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 09:03:22 -0400, Michael wrote:
>>
>>> "Gene E. Bloch" <not-> wrote in message
>>> news:1pei9tqhte23g$.yepu1nd99loc$... .
>>>> On Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:49:11 -0400, Michael wrote:
>>>> Please notice that the guy you yelled at didn't answer the original
>> post,
>>>> but a post dated "Sun, 15 Aug 2010 09:41:33 -0500".
>>>>
>>>> Yes, the thread may have started four years ago[1], but
>> AmarAkbarAnthony
>>>> was not replying to ancient material.
>>>>
>>>> [1] Assuming that you correctly computed the time interval between
>>>> 13-12-2007 (or in American notation, 12/13/2007) and 8/20/10. I
>> happen to
>>>> see it as 2 years, 8 months, 7 days. From an app I have, it's 981
>> days,
>>>> which works out to 2.688 years.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
>>>
>>> Damn Gene! You have way too much time on your hands. This still
>> doesn't
>>> resolve the fact he's a techarena moron.
>>
>> I was addressing something else, namely your tendency to
>> scream...speaking
>> of too much time on someone's hands. In fact, I meant to point out that
>> your accusations against AmarAkbarAnthony were way off the mark...
>>
>> --
>> Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)
>
> I dont know why u people are targeting me..!
> thnks 4 ur support Gene E. Bloch.

AFAIK, only Michael was targeting you, and he does that sort of thing
often...

--
Gene E. Bloch (Stumbling Bloch)