What has me stumped is that this machine is configured the same way
its sister machin is configured! They're the same model, purchased on
the same day with the same version of the OS installed.
I haven't tried this with a wired connection yet (i've heard of some
issues with the wireless adapters having troubles but that was with
any type of connection.)
What I dont understand is, i can ping inside the LAN all day long. I
can connect to resources by name all day long. But if I try to go
outside i get butkas.
I'm running LogMeIn as a remote agent so I can connect remotely. It
works fine! I can connect to this laptop from outside the company just
fine! But once connected, Internet Explorer cannot access the internet
while Firefox (2.0.10) has absolutely NO problem!
I cannot PING outside the LAN with an IP address or domain name!
What could be causing this odd behavior? My only choice if I cannot
fix this is to clone the other machine to this one and say the hell
with it but I hate to give in and not ever know what got in the way!
-JS-
>
>On 27-Nov-2007, Jacques Schett <> wrote:
>
>> The Diagnose utility (in Internet Explorer) showed that the problem
>> was an inability to contact the DNS server. The DNS server on this
>> machine is exactly the same as on the sister laptop.
>
>A good starting point would be Programs -> Accessories ->
>Command Prompt
>cd \
>To get to C:\
>Then
>ipconfig /all
>This will show what DNS servers each adapter on the respective
>PC's are using.
>In my case my ISP has DNS servers, AFAIK my local PC
>is not a DNS server, but for networking to work I have
>to enter a Gateway Address (route to the outside world),
>and my local router as the DNS server (even though it isn't)
>plus the usual subnet mask, passwords etc.
>I've found that things can go pear shaped if machines have
>more than one network adapter.
>ipconfig shows I have an Ethernet adapter with everyting
>shown, 15 parameters, plus two Tunnel adapters, one
>with 9 and one with 8 parameters, some of which are blank.
>It works, so I'm not worried about the fine detail, of the
>Tunnel Adapters.
|