http://support.microsoft.com/kb/892937 has the wrong switch

In the http://support.microsoft.com/kb/892937 article, it indicated to use
"/quiet /norestart" with the DSUW. It would hang if those switches were
used. The correct switch should be "/q:a /r:n" like the previous
accumulative one, MS04-038. It's really frustrusting that Microsoft can't
document correctly.


--
Remove ".NOSPAM" from email address to reply

What is really the point of using the SMS package, in contra to the normal
(as per the faq)

>Frequently asked questions
>Q1: What is the difference between the security update that is included in the SMS >deployment package and the security update that is documented in Microsoft >security bulletin MS05-014?

>A1: There is no difference in the security update in the SMS deployment package >and the security update that is documented in Microsoft security bulletin MS05-014.

"Tony" wrote:

> In the http://support.microsoft.com/kb/892937 article, it indicated to use
> "/quiet /norestart" with the DSUW. It would hang if those switches were
> used. The correct switch should be "/q:a /r:n" like the previous
> accumulative one, MS04-038. It's really frustrusting that Microsoft can't
> document correctly.
>
>
> --
> Remove ".NOSPAM" from email address to reply
>
>
>

I second that...after a few days i discovered this independently by doing
the /? question and seeing what switches were available. thanks for
posting..

--
Thank you,

Steve Schofield
Microsoft MVP - ASP/ASP.NET
ASPInsider Member - MCP

http://www.orcsweb.com/
Powerful Web Hosting Solutions
#1 in Service and Support
"Tony" <> wrote in message
news:...
> In the http://support.microsoft.com/kb/892937 article, it indicated to use
> "/quiet /norestart" with the DSUW. It would hang if those switches were
> used. The correct switch should be "/q:a /r:n" like the previous
> accumulative one, MS04-038. It's really frustrusting that Microsoft can't
> document correctly.
>
>
> --
> Remove ".NOSPAM" from email address to reply
>
>