> "Adela" <> wrote in message
> news:...
> WinXP home; IE6; OE6.
>
> Hello, would anyone know how to get around the following message I got in
> trying to open a link please?:
>
> "You are currently browsing this site with Internet Explorer 6 (IE6).
>
> NOTE: This template is compatible with IE6, however your experience will
> be enhanced with a newer browser.
>
> The last version of Internet Explorer 6 was called Service Pack 1 for
> Internet Explorer 6 and was released in December of 2004. By continuing
> to run Internet Explorer 6 you are open to any and all security
> vulnerabilities discovered since that date. In October of 2006, Microsoft
> released version 7 of Internet Explorer that, in addition to providing
> greater safety in navigation, which allows the Internet Explorer browser
> to identify as' modern browsers'. Microsoft has launched Internet
> Explorer 7 as a high-priority update, and is now available to download
> for free without any certification requirements. As of Feb 12th, 2008
> Microsoft is forcing updates to Internet Explorer 6 in order to move
> people towards the much improved and secure version 7. Please ensure you
> don't hamper this process. It's for your own good!
>
> Download Internet Explorer 7 NOW!"
>
> And this is the link I tried to open:
> http://israel21c.org/index.php?optio...alth&Itemid=63
>
> BTW, my IE6 has SP2 and I'm happy with it and do not wish to upgrade to
> IE7 even for free. Thanks ever so much! Adela
- - -
Hi Adela,
Actually, the SP2 you have is Service Pack 2 for Windows XP Home Edition.
There were some IE6 fixes included in that service pack, so your IE6
version number includes some extra numbers that reflect that. Both your
IE6 and your OE6 should include some additional numbers indicating XP's
Service Pack 3, which includes numerous additional security updates.
You can continue to use IE6 at least until 13 July 2010, with XP SP2, but
after that, you will no longer be able to get security updates, unless you
upgrade your operating system to Service Pack 3. With SP3, you can continue
to get high priority security updates for the Windows XP operating system,
IE, OE, and WMP (Windows Media Player) until year 2014.
Note to All: Microsoft recently extended the deadline for upgrading to SP3
from April 2010 to 13 July 2010. (Final deadline for XP is still 2014.)
Windows Operating System Product Support Lifecycle - Microsoft Internet
Explorer, Microsoft Outlook Express, and Microsoft Windows Media Player
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifewinfaq
http://support.microsoft.com/gp/lifesupsps
http://support.microsoft.com/lifecycle/?C2=1173
Windows XP extended support ends: 4/8/2014
Windows XP Service Pack 2 retired: 7/13/2010
Windows XP Service Pack 3 retired: 4/8/2014
With IE6, I tried your link to that news service web page article, and got
the same message at the top of the page, with the pomegranate article
displayed under that message. There were script errors on the page though.
Did you only get the IE6 message without the rest of the page? The warning
message included a "Close" button in the upper right that, when clicked,
closed the warning message and left only the web page, (and stored
information in a Cookie from that web page, so the message did not
re-display when I revisted the page.) After deleting the Cookie, the IE6
message came back when I revisited again. (A useful cookie?
Do you use either Automatic Updates, or go to the Windows Update site to
get the latest security updates? The October 2009 cumulative security
update was for all currently supported versions of IE. (IE5.01, IE6, IE7,
and IE8) I had already installed that update before I visited the above
web site, so maybe after you get updated, you can get past that message.
Windows Update website - (I use "Custom", and install a few at a time.)
http://update.microsoft.com/windowsu...6/default.aspx
The IE6 SP1 mentioned in that web page message refers to a special version
of Internet Explorer for Windows 2000, not the ordinary Windows XP IE6.
The person who wrote that IE warning message was badly misinformed. The
October 2009 security patches for Internet Explorer included patches for
the same four security holes in IE7 as in IE6, so IE7 was no more secure
before that patch than IE6. (However, IE8 only needed 3 of those
4 patches.) That security update also included numerous non-security
fixes for program bugs, including two fixes for IE6, two for IE7, and
ELEVEN fixes for bug-ridden IE8.
In fairness to the people who operate that web site, they may not realize
that people using IE6 are even getting that message. The site uses
previously written scripts and templates. The javascript and message were
written by a person called Djamil Legato from RocketTheme, LLC. (That
little tidbit of information is found in the rokie6warn.js file in
Temporary Internet Files folder, which you should NOT run or open except
in NotePad.) The special style sheet for IE6 is filename template_ie6.css,
and the comment at the beginning of that file, (with bleep added,) says:
"/** IE6 is a hunk of [bleep]!!! due to limitations in the CSS capabilities
of IE, these hacks are required **/"
http://israel21c.org/templates/secti...mplate_ie6.php
It is sad that a pomegranate article begins with a sour grapes attitude.
Understand and Maintain Security with Internet Explorer 6
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/ie/...y/default.mspx
"When you are visiting a site on the Web or storing information on your
computer, you want to know that your privacy is protected. Internet
Explorer 6 comes with improved security features that help you protect
your computer and your information. However, _you_ must maintain your
computer by regularly installing the latest security updates..."
If you need help getting your XP operating system updated to SP3, please
feel free to post a "Need SP3 install help" message in a separate thread:
news://msnews.microsoft.com/microsof...dowsxp.general
BTW: the idea on that web page that pomegranate seeds and/or juice might
be a "cure all" for everything from cancer to AIDS, is a bit far fetched.
(Triple-click here, to be of good cheer.

--Richard
P.S. See also my reply to Leonard's message.