| Home | Register | Members | Search | Windows Vista Tips | File Database | Links |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
|
| |
|
Andrew Hodgson
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:24:08 -0800, "Ed Podowski"
<> wrote: >I have two questions relating to implementing a RAID 1 array. The server is >running Windows Small Business Server 2003 Standard Edition with SP 2. > >System Setup Information > >I have two identical SATA hard drives. During the hardware setup, I >configured the array management software and disk controller as a RAID 1 >array. When installing the operating system I partitioned Disk 0 [Basic] >into two partitions: C drive 20GB and D drive 49GB. The drives was formatted >using NTFS. The operating system is on drive C and I assume because this is >Windows 2003 Server Family this may also be the boot volume. [During set up >I never specified anything different.] D drive has users shared folders, >shared applications, exchange store, client apps among other things. You conflicted yourself in this paragraph. First you said that you configured the hardware side of things to run using a mirrored array, then you say you did the granular partition setup using both disks. If you had configured the array before you would only see one logical disk in Windows setup. I have the same setup here, and I have the motherboard doing all the array controler (probably not much faster than doing it using Windows, but was easier and less painful) - I have an Intel chipset, and when booting up the system, I can go into the array setup to create the mirrored drive. If you have such a setup option when your system starts, you may be able to set up the array this way, mirroring the contents of disk 1, all data that was previously on disk 2 will be erased. Disk1 will then mirror onto disk 2 as you go along. You shouldn't need to do any fiddling in Windows, but it may be a good idea to ensure you have the latest RAID drivers installed from the manufacturer - I had to ensure I ran latest Intel drivers, as earlier versions caused SBS setup to fail. Alternatively, convert the disk to a dynamic disk, and add mirroring to each partition individually - see later. > [...] > >[Windows Help] >Shadow copies storage area. If you are using a basic disk as a storage area >for shadow copies and you intend to convert the disk into a dynamic disk, it >is important to take the following precaution to avoid data loss. If the disk >is a non-boot volume and is a different volume from where the original files >reside, you must first dismount and take offline the volume containing the >original files before you convert the disk containing shadow copies to a >dynamic disk. You must bring the volume containing the original files back >online within 20 minutes, otherwise, you will lose the data stored in the >existing shadow copies. If the shadow copies are located on a boot volume, >you can convert the disk to dynamic without losing shadow copies. >The disk or partition is a not the boot volume but is the same as where the >original files resides. Now what do I do? Can I disable the shadow copies >on volume D and wait 20 minutes before proceeding? I don’t need the data in >the existing shadow copy. Do I still have to dismount and take offline this >volume? Yes. > >Second Question >I cannot find out what happens to the two partitions on Disk 0 when I >convert from a basic drive to a dynamic drive? Are the partitions >eliminated? What happens to the data on volume D in this scenario? They will be present still but are not mirrored. You will need to mirror individually. > [...] > >But…What about mirroring volume D where all the shared files and the >exchange store is located? Do I follow the same procedure as in the boot and >system partition? Do I need to convert Disk 1 to a Dynamic drive and I >assume that there are no partitions in Dynamic Drives? Is this correct? When you convert the disk to dynamic you will see the same partitions. You just then need to mirror the partitions to the second disk. One other advantage to using a hardware type RAID setup is that if the one disk fails, you don't have to mess with boot.ini files when you want to boot from the second disk. Andrew. -- Andrew Hodgson in Bromyard, Herefordshire, UK. My Email: use <andrew at hodgsonfamily dot org>. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ed Podowski
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Andrew,
Thank you for your response. I really did set up the hardware configuration and thought that was all I needed to do to set up the RAID 1 array. I did not find anything else in the hardware documentation. I am using an ASUS K8N-DL [ http://usa.asus.com/products4.aspx?m...3&l2=17&l3=173 ] server motherboard which supports dual AMD Opteron CPU and has a NVIDIA CK8-04 Professional chipset with support for 4 x SATA-II Gb/s drives in a RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 1+0 configurations. After all the hardware was connected as the computer was booting, I went into the NVIDIA set up and defined the RAID 1 array. After partitioning and installing the SBS 2003 operating system, the second drive did not have any data. So I thought that I needed to do something in SBS 2003. That is when I started to read the help screens. I went to ASUS web site but was unable to locate any further steps I needed to take. I would prefer to set up the RAID 1 as defined by the hardware. I think there are performance advantages as you mentioned to using the hardware as opposed to SBS 2003. This is the reason for using this motherboard. What step am I missing? Any help would be greatly appreciated. Thank you again for your time. Ed Podowski "Andrew Hodgson" wrote: > On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:24:08 -0800, "Ed Podowski" > <> wrote: > > >I have two questions relating to implementing a RAID 1 array. The server is > >running Windows Small Business Server 2003 Standard Edition with SP 2. > > > >System Setup Information > > > >I have two identical SATA hard drives. During the hardware setup, I > >configured the array management software and disk controller as a RAID 1 > >array. When installing the operating system I partitioned Disk 0 [Basic] > >into two partitions: C drive 20GB and D drive 49GB. The drives was formatted > >using NTFS. The operating system is on drive C and I assume because this is > >Windows 2003 Server Family this may also be the boot volume. [During set up > >I never specified anything different.] D drive has users shared folders, > >shared applications, exchange store, client apps among other things. > > You conflicted yourself in this paragraph. First you said that you > configured the hardware side of things to run using a mirrored array, > then you say you did the granular partition setup using both disks. > If you had configured the array before you would only see one logical > disk in Windows setup. > > I have the same setup here, and I have the motherboard doing all the > array controler (probably not much faster than doing it using Windows, > but was easier and less painful) - I have an Intel chipset, and when > booting up the system, I can go into the array setup to create the > mirrored drive. > > If you have such a setup option when your system starts, you may be > able to set up the array this way, mirroring the contents of disk 1, > all data that was previously on disk 2 will be erased. Disk1 will > then mirror onto disk 2 as you go along. You shouldn't need to do any > fiddling in Windows, but it may be a good idea to ensure you have the > latest RAID drivers installed from the manufacturer - I had to ensure > I ran latest Intel drivers, as earlier versions caused SBS setup to > fail. > > Alternatively, convert the disk to a dynamic disk, and add mirroring > to each partition individually - see later. > > > [...] > > > >[Windows Help] > >Shadow copies storage area. If you are using a basic disk as a storage area > >for shadow copies and you intend to convert the disk into a dynamic disk, it > >is important to take the following precaution to avoid data loss. If the disk > >is a non-boot volume and is a different volume from where the original files > >reside, you must first dismount and take offline the volume containing the > >original files before you convert the disk containing shadow copies to a > >dynamic disk. You must bring the volume containing the original files back > >online within 20 minutes, otherwise, you will lose the data stored in the > >existing shadow copies. If the shadow copies are located on a boot volume, > >you can convert the disk to dynamic without losing shadow copies. > >The disk or partition is a not the boot volume but is the same as where the > >original files resides. Now what do I do? Can I disable the shadow copies > >on volume D and wait 20 minutes before proceeding? I don’t need the data in > >the existing shadow copy. Do I still have to dismount and take offline this > >volume? > > Yes. > > > >Second Question > >I cannot find out what happens to the two partitions on Disk 0 when I > >convert from a basic drive to a dynamic drive? Are the partitions > >eliminated? What happens to the data on volume D in this scenario? > > They will be present still but are not mirrored. You will need to > mirror individually. > > > [...] > > > >But…What about mirroring volume D where all the shared files and the > >exchange store is located? Do I follow the same procedure as in the boot and > >system partition? Do I need to convert Disk 1 to a Dynamic drive and I > >assume that there are no partitions in Dynamic Drives? Is this correct? > > When you convert the disk to dynamic you will see the same partitions. > You just then need to mirror the partitions to the second disk. > > One other advantage to using a hardware type RAID setup is that if the > one disk fails, you don't have to mess with boot.ini files when you > want to boot from the second disk. > > Andrew. > -- > Andrew Hodgson in Bromyard, Herefordshire, UK. > My Email: use <andrew at hodgsonfamily dot org>. > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jenny wu [MSFT]
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Ed Podowski,
Thanks for posting here! Also thanks for Andrew's input. For your description, I understand that you have some concerns about install SBS 2003 on the hardware RAID 1 drive. If I am off base, please don't hesitate to let me know. For your RAID 1 drive is hardware RAID 1, you will not see the mirrored drive in the Disk Management console. What is your mean "After partitioning and installing the SBS 2003 operating system, the second drive did not have any data."? Do you mean you can not find data in the second partition? If so, it is normal since the SBS 2003 installation by default install all applications in the main partition. If not, how you find there is no data in the drive? Through which interface to find that? £½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½ If you don't like so many data on the main partition, you can take some actions to move client programs folder, sharepoint database, monitor database, and so on to different partition or drive. You can refer to the following MS white paper to move data folders as you want to: Moving Data Folders for Windows Small Business Server 2003 http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../movedata.mspx 830254 How to move the client programs folder to another location in Windows http://support.microsoft.com/?id=830254 821915 How to move Exchange databases and logs in Exchange Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/?id=821915 £½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½ The Volume Shadow Copy Service provides the backup infrastructure for the Microsoft Windows XP and Microsoft Windows Server 2003 operating systems, as well as a mechanism for creating consistent point-in-time copies of data known as shadow copies. Previous to the Volume Shadow Copy Service and its standard set of extensible application programming interfaces (APIs), there was no standard way to produce "clean" (uncorrupted) snapshots of a volume. Snapshots often contained corruptions due to "torn writes" that required the use of utilities such as Chkdsk.exe to repair. Torn writes occur when an unplanned event (such as a power failure) prevents the system from completely writing a block of data to disk. The Volume Shadow Copy Service APIs prevent torn writes by enabling applications to flush partially committed data from memory. The Volume Shadow Copy Service has native support for creating consistent shadow copies across multiple volumes, regardless of the snapshot technology or application. The Volume Shadow Copy Service can produce consistent shadow copies by coordinating with business applications, file-system services, backup applications, fast recovery solutions, and storage hardware. Several features in the Windows Server 2003 operating systems use the Volume Shadow Copy Service, including Shadow Copies for Shared Folders and Backup. For more detail information about how to create shadow copy and how it works: What Is Volume Shadow Copy Service? http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../library/TechR ef/3cf204e6-709a-4eb8-8cbc-ad9655de91ba.mspx How Volume Shadow Copy Service Works http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../library/TechR ef/2b0d2457-b7d8-42c3-b6c9-59c145b7765f.mspx Storage Management Using Windows Server 2003 and Windows Storage Server 2003 Virtual Disk Service and Volume Shadow Copy Service http://www.microsoft.com/windowsserv...plandeploy/sto rmgtusingvdsvss.mspx £½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½ To the change basic drive to dynamic drive question, when we change basic drive to dynamic drive, data can not be lost in Windows 2003 OS. However if we convert the dynamic disk to a basic disk, the data on the dynamic disk will be lost. Therefore, please backup the data to a secure location such as tape or network locations. There should be no problem to convert Basic to Dynamic disk (note that it''s a one-way change and you cannot convert back without reinstalling the System.) However, a backup before doing anything big is still recommended. Nothing beats a well prepared backup. : The following article has more details: HOW TO: Use the Disk Management Snap-in to Manage Basic and Dynamic Disks in Windows Server 2003 http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;323442 Restrictions on Extending or Spanning Simple Volumes on Dynamic Disks http://support.microsoft.com/default...b;en-us;225551 To change a dynamic disk back to a basic disk http://www.microsoft.com/technet/pro.../library/Serve rHelp/2999d73d-4c49-45c6-96cb-ec6d7686317b.mspx £½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½£½ Hope above information helps! If you have any further concern on the issue please let me know. I am happy to be assistance of you and look forward to your reply! Have a nice day! Sincerely, Jenny Wu Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security ================================================== ==== This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have issues regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the corresponding newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely manner. You can locate the newsgroup here: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.aspx When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you check the "Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there are any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your newsreader, please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from your issue. Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although we provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In doing so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner. For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly. Please check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers. Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated. ================================================== ==== This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. -------------------- >Thread-Topic: Implementing a RAID 1 Array >thread-index: AcXgJyfllbXsC64gSpGAvkg8XHZTCg== >X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 69.137.237.26 >From: "=?Utf-8?B?RWQgUG9kb3dza2k=?=" <> >References: <9E18DF84-AF05-4092-B25F-> <> >Subject: Re: Implementing a RAID 1 Array >Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 19:32:02 -0800 >Lines: 121 >Message-ID: <2FC8DFE0-317B-4E8A-A8D8-> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="Utf-8" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit >X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 >Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message >Importance: normal >Priority: normal >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs >NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250 >Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl >Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:167151 >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs > >Andrew, > >Thank you for your response. > >I really did set up the hardware configuration and thought that was all I >needed to do to set up the RAID 1 array. I did not find anything else in the >hardware documentation. > >I am using an ASUS K8N-DL [ >http://usa.asus.com/products4.aspx?m...3&l2=17&l3=173 ] >server motherboard which supports dual AMD Opteron CPU and has a NVIDIA >CK8-04 Professional chipset with support for 4 x SATA-II Gb/s drives in a >RAID 0, RAID 1, RAID 1+0 configurations. > >After all the hardware was connected as the computer was booting, I went >into the NVIDIA set up and defined the RAID 1 array. > >After partitioning and installing the SBS 2003 operating system, the second >drive did not have any data. So I thought that I needed to do something in >SBS 2003. That is when I started to read the help screens. > >I went to ASUS web site but was unable to locate any further steps I needed >to take. I would prefer to set up the RAID 1 as defined by the hardware. I >think there are performance advantages as you mentioned to using the hardware >as opposed to SBS 2003. This is the reason for using this motherboard. What >step am I missing? Any help would be greatly appreciated. > >Thank you again for your time. >Ed Podowski > >"Andrew Hodgson" wrote: > >> On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 11:24:08 -0800, "Ed Podowski" >> <> wrote: >> >> >I have two questions relating to implementing a RAID 1 array. The server is >> >running Windows Small Business Server 2003 Standard Edition with SP 2. >> > >> >System Setup Information >> > >> >I have two identical SATA hard drives. During the hardware setup, I >> >configured the array management software and disk controller as a RAID 1 >> >array. When installing the operating system I partitioned Disk 0 [Basic] >> >into two partitions: C drive 20GB and D drive 49GB. The drives was formatted >> >using NTFS. The operating system is on drive C and I assume because this is >> >Windows 2003 Server Family this may also be the boot volume. [During set up >> >I never specified anything different.] D drive has users shared folders, >> >shared applications, exchange store, client apps among other things. >> >> You conflicted yourself in this paragraph. First you said that you >> configured the hardware side of things to run using a mirrored array, >> then you say you did the granular partition setup using both disks. >> If you had configured the array before you would only see one logical >> disk in Windows setup. >> >> I have the same setup here, and I have the motherboard doing all the >> array controler (probably not much faster than doing it using Windows, >> but was easier and less painful) - I have an Intel chipset, and when >> booting up the system, I can go into the array setup to create the >> mirrored drive. >> >> If you have such a setup option when your system starts, you may be >> able to set up the array this way, mirroring the contents of disk 1, >> all data that was previously on disk 2 will be erased. Disk1 will >> then mirror onto disk 2 as you go along. You shouldn't need to do any >> fiddling in Windows, but it may be a good idea to ensure you have the >> latest RAID drivers installed from the manufacturer - I had to ensure >> I ran latest Intel drivers, as earlier versions caused SBS setup to >> fail. >> >> Alternatively, convert the disk to a dynamic disk, and add mirroring >> to each partition individually - see later. >> > >> [...] >> > >> >[Windows Help] >> >Shadow copies storage area. If you are using a basic disk as a storage area >> >for shadow copies and you intend to convert the disk into a dynamic disk, it >> >is important to take the following precaution to avoid data loss. If the disk >> >is a non-boot volume and is a different volume from where the original files >> >reside, you must first dismount and take offline the volume containing the >> >original files before you convert the disk containing shadow copies to a >> >dynamic disk. You must bring the volume containing the original files back >> >online within 20 minutes, otherwise, you will lose the data stored in the >> >existing shadow copies. If the shadow copies are located on a boot volume, >> >you can convert the disk to dynamic without losing shadow copies. >> >The disk or partition is a not the boot volume but is the same as where the >> >original files resides. Now what do I do? Can I disable the shadow copies >> >on volume D and wait 20 minutes before proceeding? I don’t need the data in >> >the existing shadow copy. Do I still have to dismount and take offline this >> >volume? >> >> Yes. >> > >> >Second Question >> >I cannot find out what happens to the two partitions on Disk 0 when I >> >convert from a basic drive to a dynamic drive? Are the partitions >> >eliminated? What happens to the data on volume D in this scenario? >> >> They will be present still but are not mirrored. You will need to >> mirror individually. >> > >> [...] >> > >> >But…What about mirroring volume D where all the shared files and the >> >exchange store is located? Do I follow the same procedure as in the boot and >> >system partition? Do I need to convert Disk 1 to a Dynamic drive and I >> >assume that there are no partitions in Dynamic Drives? Is this correct? >> >> When you convert the disk to dynamic you will see the same partitions. >> You just then need to mirror the partitions to the second disk. >> >> One other advantage to using a hardware type RAID setup is that if the >> one disk fails, you don't have to mess with boot.ini files when you >> want to boot from the second disk. >> >> Andrew. >> -- >> Andrew Hodgson in Bromyard, Herefordshire, UK. >> My Email: use <andrew at hodgsonfamily dot org>. >> > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Andrew Hodgson
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 19:32:02 -0800, "Ed Podowski"
<> wrote: >Andrew, > >Thank you for your response. > >I really did set up the hardware configuration and thought that was all I >needed to do to set up the RAID 1 array. I did not find anything else in the >hardware documentation. In that case go back there and check what the status of the RAID is. If you are seeing a second disk this isn't running in a RAID environment unless you have more than two drives and the third one is not part of an array. It should be easy to configure the mirror from the hardware config screens. Andrew. -- Andrew Hodgson in Bromyard, Herefordshire, UK. My Email: use <andrew at hodgsonfamily dot org>. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ed Podowski
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Andrew,
Thank you again for your imput. Without it I would not have been able to make the distinction between the hardware RAID setup and SBS 2003 RAID setup. I think I know where I have been going wrong. I found some documentation [way backin the motherboard user guide] and in the BIOS set up there is a NVRAID Configuration sub-menu. It says "select the items you wish to enable to create a RAID set." I am not able to see the setting [because I am not at the client's office until Monday] but I do not remember seeing this screen when I was in the BIOS. The NVRAID may be enabled, but the First SATA Master RAID and the Second SATA Master RAID may be disabled. This is why I was able to select the drives for the RAID 1 array. When I am back at this client's office on Monday and I will reboot the server and check this screen. My only concern now is once I enable the two SATA Masters, will this wipe out my hard drive with the operating system and data files? Do you know if this is a potential problem? Thank you again, Ed Podowski "Andrew Hodgson" wrote: > On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 19:32:02 -0800, "Ed Podowski" > <> wrote: > > >Andrew, > > > >Thank you for your response. > > > >I really did set up the hardware configuration and thought that was all I > >needed to do to set up the RAID 1 array. I did not find anything else in the > >hardware documentation. > > In that case go back there and check what the status of the RAID is. > If you are seeing a second disk this isn't running in a RAID > environment unless you have more than two drives and the third one is > not part of an array. > > It should be easy to configure the mirror from the hardware config > screens. > > Andrew. > -- > Andrew Hodgson in Bromyard, Herefordshire, UK. > My Email: use <andrew at hodgsonfamily dot org>. > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Jenny wu [MSFT]
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
Hi Ed Podowski,
When you reconfigure the hardware RAID set, both drives will be formatted. I am afraid the OS and data will be removed. I am happy to be assistance of you. Have a nice day! Sincerely, Jenny Wu Microsoft CSS Online Newsgroup Support Get Secure! - www.microsoft.com/security ================================================== ==== This newsgroup only focuses on SBS technical issues. If you have issues regarding other Microsoft products, you'd better post in the corresponding newsgroups so that they can be resolved in an efficient and timely manner. You can locate the newsgroup here: http://www.microsoft.com/communities...s/default.aspx When opening a new thread via the web interface, we recommend you check the "Notify me of replies" box to receive e-mail notifications when there are any updates in your thread. When responding to posts via your newsreader, please "Reply to Group" so that others may learn and benefit from your issue. Microsoft engineers can only focus on one issue per thread. Although we provide other information for your reference, we recommend you post different incidents in different threads to keep the thread clean. In doing so, it will ensure your issues are resolved in a timely manner. For urgent issues, you may want to contact Microsoft CSS directly. Please check http://support.microsoft.com for regional support phone numbers. Any input or comments in this thread are highly appreciated. ================================================== ==== This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. -------------------- >Thread-Topic: Implementing a RAID 1 Array >thread-index: AcXg3gWv8zxV1BpxRJSfTkoVi2Zq3Q== >X-WBNR-Posting-Host: 69.137.237.26 >From: "=?Utf-8?B?RWQgUG9kb3dza2k=?=" <> >References: <9E18DF84-AF05-4092-B25F-> <> <2FC8DFE0-317B-4E8A-A8D8-> <> >Subject: Re: Implementing a RAID 1 Array >Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2005 17:21:03 -0800 >Lines: 52 >Message-ID: <91DEA774-F5F8-4638-9FF9-> >MIME-Version: 1.0 >Content-Type: text/plain; > charset="Utf-8" >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit >X-Newsreader: Microsoft CDO for Windows 2000 >Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message >Importance: normal >Priority: normal >X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.0 >Newsgroups: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs >NNTP-Posting-Host: TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl 10.40.2.250 >Path: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl!TK2MSFTNGXA03.phx.gbl >Xref: TK2MSFTNGXA01.phx.gbl microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs:167493 >X-Tomcat-NG: microsoft.public.windows.server.sbs > >Andrew, > >Thank you again for your imput. Without it I would not have been able to >make the distinction between the hardware RAID setup and SBS 2003 RAID setup. > >I think I know where I have been going wrong. I found some documentation >[way backin the motherboard user guide] and in the BIOS set up there is a >NVRAID Configuration sub-menu. It says "select the items you wish to enable >to create a RAID set." > >I am not able to see the setting [because I am not at the client's office >until Monday] but I do not remember seeing this screen when I was in the >BIOS. The NVRAID may be enabled, but the First SATA Master RAID and the >Second SATA Master RAID may be disabled. This is why I was able to select >the drives for the RAID 1 array. > >When I am back at this client's office on Monday and I will reboot the >server and check this screen. My only concern now is once I enable the two >SATA Masters, will this wipe out my hard drive with the operating system and >data files? > >Do you know if this is a potential problem? > >Thank you again, >Ed Podowski > >"Andrew Hodgson" wrote: > >> On Wed, 2 Nov 2005 19:32:02 -0800, "Ed Podowski" >> <> wrote: >> >> >Andrew, >> > >> >Thank you for your response. >> > >> >I really did set up the hardware configuration and thought that was all I >> >needed to do to set up the RAID 1 array. I did not find anything else in the >> >hardware documentation. >> >> In that case go back there and check what the status of the RAID is. >> If you are seeing a second disk this isn't running in a RAID >> environment unless you have more than two drives and the third one is >> not part of an array. >> >> It should be easy to configure the mirror from the hardware config >> screens. >> >> Andrew. >> -- >> Andrew Hodgson in Bromyard, Herefordshire, UK. >> My Email: use <andrew at hodgsonfamily dot org>. >> > |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
Andrew Hodgson
Guest
Posts: n/a
|
On Fri, 04 Nov 2005 12:20:07 GMT, v-
("Jenny wu [MSFT]") wrote: >Hi Ed Podowski, > >When you reconfigure the hardware RAID set, both drives will be formatted. >I am afraid the OS and data will be removed. This is not necessairly the case though you should do an image to be sure. In my RAID config, I am able to add another mirror no problem - I tested this fine. However, I don't like the information you refered to in the BIOS, and suspect this is relating to a lower level than the RAID system. I recommend you search the mobo on the Internet and also the chipset and see if anyone else has any RAID config issues/questions/etc to report before going any further. Andrew. -- Andrew Hodgson in Bromyard, Herefordshire, UK. My Email: use <andrew at hodgsonfamily dot org>. |
|
|
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
| |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Hardware RAID or OS RAID? | geek-y-guy | Windows Server | 7 | 04-07-2008 10:50 AM |
| Raid 5 problems in Vista 64 bit | Maz | Windows 64 Bit | 6 | 11-16-2007 01:19 PM |
| move from RAID 1 to RAID 5.... | Ken Gardner | Windows Small Business Server | 10 | 03-10-2005 11:42 PM |
| Raid | plauche | Windows Small Business Server | 41 | 07-15-2004 08:30 PM |
| 2003 OS Server Hard drive install limit. | WOCONNO4 | Windows Small Business Server | 14 | 06-24-2004 05:15 AM |
Forum Software Powered by vBulletin®, Copyright Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.3.2 ©2009, Crawlability, Inc. |



Linear Mode

