Windows Vista Tips

Windows Vista Tips > Newsgroups > Windows Vista Installation > Installation fails on trying to dual boot with XP Pro on a SATA d

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes

Installation fails on trying to dual boot with XP Pro on a SATA d

 
 
Hawk3
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-23-2006
I have an Abit KN8 Ultra motherboard, an IDE Maxtor DMP 9 PATA drive as slave
in IDE 2 and a Maxtor DMP 10 SATA drive in SATA 1 (the first available SATA
slot). The computer boots XP Pro 32-bit from the SATA drive's first, 'active'
partition, C: ('system'). Other partitions on it are D:, E: and H: (20 GB
free) all of the type 'Basic'. The PATA drive is just a single partition for
backups, with 6 GB available.

When booting from the Vista 64-bit DVD (It's a 64-bit CPU ), the empty 20
GB NTFS partition H: is recognised in the target list (for installation), but
when I proceed to install I am told Vista needs a valid system volume to
work, and that enough space has been found on disk 1, on the partition with 6
GB space left. The installation then fails with an unspecified error and
refuses to install to the perfectly good, empty H: partition.

Do I need to set H: as the active partition or is there some other blatantly
obvious step I am missing? I have tried installing the storage driver for the
SATA drive in the 'Load Driver' option in the Vista installer but it did not
work as neither the 32-bit nor the 64-bit drivers were recognised.

Also, if I set H: as active, I imagine I will not be able to boot to XP
without setting C: active first (which I'd have to do from XP..), is this
correct?
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
 
Steve Swatman
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-24-2006
you need a 40 g drive partition to setup vista, the minimum i found to work
was 38 gigs.

steve
"Hawk3" <> wrote in message
news:4572DB8C-D64C-481D-892E-...
>I have an Abit KN8 Ultra motherboard, an IDE Maxtor DMP 9 PATA drive as
>slave
> in IDE 2 and a Maxtor DMP 10 SATA drive in SATA 1 (the first available
> SATA
> slot). The computer boots XP Pro 32-bit from the SATA drive's first,
> 'active'
> partition, C: ('system'). Other partitions on it are D:, E: and H: (20 GB
> free) all of the type 'Basic'. The PATA drive is just a single partition
> for
> backups, with 6 GB available.
>
> When booting from the Vista 64-bit DVD (It's a 64-bit CPU ), the empty
> 20
> GB NTFS partition H: is recognised in the target list (for installation),
> but
> when I proceed to install I am told Vista needs a valid system volume to
> work, and that enough space has been found on disk 1, on the partition
> with 6
> GB space left. The installation then fails with an unspecified error and
> refuses to install to the perfectly good, empty H: partition.
>
> Do I need to set H: as the active partition or is there some other
> blatantly
> obvious step I am missing? I have tried installing the storage driver for
> the
> SATA drive in the 'Load Driver' option in the Vista installer but it did
> not
> work as neither the 32-bit nor the 64-bit drivers were recognised.
>
> Also, if I set H: as active, I imagine I will not be able to boot to XP
> without setting C: active first (which I'd have to do from XP..), is this
> correct?


 
Reply With Quote
 
andy
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-25-2006
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006 09:56:02 -0700, Hawk3
<> wrote:

>I have an Abit KN8 Ultra motherboard, an IDE Maxtor DMP 9 PATA drive as slave
>in IDE 2 and a Maxtor DMP 10 SATA drive in SATA 1 (the first available SATA
>slot). The computer boots XP Pro 32-bit from the SATA drive's first, 'active'
>partition, C: ('system'). Other partitions on it are D:, E: and H: (20 GB
>free) all of the type 'Basic'. The PATA drive is just a single partition for
>backups, with 6 GB available.
>
>When booting from the Vista 64-bit DVD (It's a 64-bit CPU ), the empty 20
>GB NTFS partition H: is recognised in the target list (for installation), but
>when I proceed to install I am told Vista needs a valid system volume to
>work, and that enough space has been found on disk 1, on the partition with 6
>GB space left.


The reason you see this is because Vista setup does not see an active
primary partition on the system drive (the one that the BIOS boots
from). Is the PATA drive first in the list of drives in BIOS setup
under Hard Disk Boot Priority?

> The installation then fails with an unspecified error and
>refuses to install to the perfectly good, empty H: partition.


In order for the installation to proceed, two conditions must be
satisfied: 1) the primary partition on the system drive must be active
and formatted, and 2) the partition that Vista will be installed in
must be formatted.

>
>Do I need to set H: as the active partition or is there some other blatantly
>obvious step I am missing? I have tried installing the storage driver for the
>SATA drive in the 'Load Driver' option in the Vista installer but it did not
>work as neither the 32-bit nor the 64-bit drivers were recognised.
>
>Also, if I set H: as active, I imagine I will not be able to boot to XP
>without setting C: active first (which I'd have to do from XP..), is this
>correct?


Yes.
 
Reply With Quote
 
Hawk3
Guest
Posts: n/a

 
      06-29-2006
Ah thanks, I see. So it has to be the active partition. I didn't think it
needed it as from experience, XP 64-bit will install to a non-active primary
partition.

It's the SATA drive that was first in the Hard Disk Boot Priority because
the installation of XP Pro 32-bit that booted fine was booting from there.
The PATA drive was nothing more than a data backup drive.

I have subsequently set up dual booting XP Pro 32-bit and 64-bit from the
PATA drive and put it first in the BIOS HDBP. Once I get around to giving
Vista another go I trust setting the partition active will help.

"andy" wrote:

....
---

Could you please refer me to your source on this. The only reference to 40
GB and Vista I found was
"40 GB of hard drive capacity with 15 GB free space." (What is a Windows
Vista Capable PC?, A Windows Vista Premium Ready PC includes at least,
http://www.microsoft.com/uk/windowsv...y/capable.mspx). This merely
states that a PC with Vista preinstalled on it and labeled as above, will be
provided with a 40 GB hard disk, it makes no reference to it being an actual
minimum spec. I apologise for sounding a tad sceptical, but I find it
unrealistic that a ~4 GB Vista DVD would require a 40 GB hard disk to install.

"Steve Swatman" wrote:

....

Thank you both for replies!
 
Reply With Quote
 
 
 
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vista installation fails on first boot-up spoz1975 Windows Vista Installation 8 09-25-2007 12:55 PM
How can I set uup dual boot after installation? HH Windows Vista Installation 2 05-12-2007 02:35 AM
Can I dual boot Vista on IDE & SATA? John T Windows Vista Installation 2 11-22-2006 07:55 PM
Dual Boot Installation XP Pro And Vista RC1 Big Foot Windows Vista Installation 3 10-18-2006 09:03 PM
SATA and regular IDE dual boot Lignus Windows Vista Installation 5 07-02-2006 04:40 AM



1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59